The limitations of adaptive dynamics as a model of evolution

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1186-1190

  Barton, N H ^a   Polechova J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MUTATION; NOTE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 28444451956     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00943.x     Document Type: Note

References (34)

1. Abrams, P.A. 2001. Adaptive dynamics: Neither F nor G. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 369-373.
2. Barton, N.H. & Keightley, P.D. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 11-21.
3. Bradshaw, H.D., Otto, K.G., Frewen, B.E., McKay, J.K. & Schemske, D.W. 1998. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics 149: 367-382.
4. Davies, E.K., Peters, A.D. & Keightley, P.D. 1999. High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 285: 1748-1751.
5. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 354-357.
6. Dieckmann, U. & Law, R. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: A derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34: 579-612.
7. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am.Nat. 156: S77-S101.
8. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2003. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421: 259-264.
9. Doebley, J. & Stec, A. 1991. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129: 285-295.
10. Estes, S., Phillips, P.C., Denver, D.R., Thomas, W.K. & Lynch, M. 2004. Mutation Accumulation in Populations of Varying Size: The Distribution of mutational Effects for Fitness Correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 166: 1269-1279.
11. Felsenstein, J. 1975. A pain in the torus: some difficulties with the model of isolation by distance. Amer.Nat. 109: 359-368.
12. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Geritz, S.A.H. & Kisdi, E. 2000. Adaptive dynamics in diploid, sexual populations and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Pro. R. Soc. (Lond.) B 267: 1671-1678.
14. Grant, P.R. 1986. The evolution and ecology of Darwin's finches. Princeton University Press, NJ, USA.
15. Gyllenberg, M. & Meszéna, G. 2005. On the impossibility of coexistence of infinitely many strategies. J Math Biol 50: 133-160.
16. Hill, W.G. 1982. Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 79: 142-145.
17. Kimura, M. 1965. A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 54: 731-736.
18. Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Kisdi, E. & Geritz, S.A.H. 1999. Adaptive dynamics in allele space: Evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 53: 993-1008.
20. Kondrashov, A.S. 1988. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336: 435-441.
21. Lande, R. 1975. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet. Res. 26: 221-236.
22. Lande, R. 1977. The influence of the mating system on the maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characters. Genetics 86: 485-498.
23. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
24. Lande, R. 1980. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94: 203-215.
25. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 78: 3721-3725.
26. Lynch, M., Blanchard, J., Houle, D., Kibota, T., Vassilieva, S. & Willis, J. 1999. Spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53: 645-663.
27. Lynch, M. & Walsh, J.B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Massachussetts.
28. Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A. & van Heerwarden, J.S. 1996. Adaptive dynamics, a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems (S. J. van Strien & S. M. Verduyn Lunel, eds), pp. 183-231. KNAW Verhandelingen, Amsterdam.
29. Orr, H.A. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: The distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935-949.
30. Roughgarden, J. 1972. The evolution of niche width. Amer. Nat. 106: 683-718.
31. Stam, L.F. & Laurie, C.C. 1996. Molecular dissection of a major gene effect on a quantitative trait: the level of alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144: 1559-1564.
32. Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Pop. Biol. 25: 138-193.
33. Young, W.R., Roberts, A.J. & Stuhne, G. 2001. Reproductive pair correlations and the clustering of organisms. Nature 412: 328-331.
34. Waxman, D. & Gavrilets, S. 2005. 20 questions on adaptive dynamics. J Evol Biol 18: 1139-1154.