The geography of mammalian speciation: Mixed signals from phylogenies and range maps

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 601-615

  Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M ^a,b   Turelli, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Age range correlation; Allopatric speciation; Parapatric speciation; Phylogenies; Speciation theories; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; DIVERGENCE; GENE FLOW; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MAMMAL; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NICHE OVERLAP; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATEDNESS; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

MAMMALIA;

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ANTELOPE; ARTICLE; BAT; FELIDAE; GENETICS; LAGOMORPH; MAMMAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RODENT; SHREW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; ANTELOPES; CHIROPTERA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; FELIDAE; GENETIC SPECIATION; LAGOMORPHA; MAMMALS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RODENTIA; SHREWS;

EID: 33646901374     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-453.1     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Agapow, P.-M., O. R. P. Bininda-Edmonds, K. A. Crandall, J. L. Gittleman, G. M. Mace, J. C. Marshall, and A. Purvis. 2004. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 79:161-179.
2. Alexander, L. F., and B. R. Riddle. 2005. Phylogenetics of the New World rodent family Heteromyidae. J. Mammal. 86:366-379.
3. Allen, J. A. 1907. Mutations and the geographic distribution of nearly related species in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 41:653-655.
4. Alroy, J. 1999. Putting North America's end-Pleistocene megafaunal extinction in context: large-scale analyses of spatial patterns, extinction rates, and size distributions. Pp. 105-143 in R. D. E. MacPhee, ed. Extinctions in near time. Kluwer, New York.
5. Anderson, S., and M. K. Evensen. 1978. Randomness in allopatric speciation. Syst. Zool. 27:421-430.
6. Avise, J. C., D. Walker, and G. C. Johns. 1998. Speciation durations and Pleistocene effects on vertebrate phylogeography. Proc. R. Soc. B 265:1707-1712.
7. Barraclough, T. G., and S. Nee. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:391-399.
8. Barraclough, T. G., and A. P. Vogler. 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. Am. Nat. 155:419-434.
9. Barraclough, T. G., A. P. Vogler, and P. H. Harvey. 1998. Revealing the factors that promote speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 353:241-249.
10. Bennett, K. D. 1997. Evolution and ecology: the pace of life. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
11. Berlocher, S. H. 1998. Can sympatric speciation via host or habitat shift be proven from phylogenetic and biogeographic evidence? Pp. 99-113 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
12. Berlocher, S. H., and J. L. Feder. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:773-815.
13. Bolnick, D. I. 2004. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58:895-899.
14. Brown, J. H., and P. F. Nicoletto. 1991. Spatial scaling of species composition: body masses of North American land mammals. Am. Nat. 138:1478-1512.
15. Browne, J. 1980. Darwin's botanical arithmetic and the principle of divergence. J. Hist. Biol. 13:53-89.
16. Burton, J. F. 1995. Birds and climate change. Christopher Helm, London.
17. Chapman, J. A., and J. E. C. Flux. 1990. Rabbits, hares, and pikas, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
18. Chesser, R. T., and R. M. Zink. 1994. Modes of speciation in birds: a test of Lynch's method. Evolution 48:490-497.
19. Clements, F. E. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. J. Ecol. 24:252-284.
20. Corbet, G. B. 1978. The mammals of the Palaearctic region: a taxonomic review. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
21. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
22. _. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
23. Coyne, J. A., and T. D. Price. 2000. Little evidence for sympatric speciation in island birds. Evolution 54:2166-2171.
24. Cracraft, J. 1982. Geographic differentiation, cladistics, and vicariance biogeography: Reconstructing the tempo and mode of evolution. Am. Zool. 22:411-424.
25. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London.
26. Darwin, F. 1909. The foundations of The Origin of Species: two essays written in 1842 and 1844 by Charles Darwin. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
27. Demastes, J. W., T. A. Spradling, M. S. Hafner, D. J. Hafner, and D. L. Reed. 2002. Systematics and phylogeography of pocket gophers in the genera Cratogeomys and Pappageomys. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:144-154.
28. DeWalt, T. S., E. G. Zimmerman, and J. V. Planz. 1993. Mitochondrial-DNA phylogeny of species of the boylii and truei groups of Peromyscus. J. Mammal. 74:352-362.
29. Dietz, E. J. 1983. Permutation tests for association between distance matrices. Syst. Zool. 32:21-26.
30. Drés, M., and J. Mallet. 2002. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 357:471-492.
31. Edwards, S. V., S. B. Kingan, J. D. Calkins, C. N. Balakrishnan, W. B. Jennings, W. J. Swanson, and M. D. Sorenson. 2005. Speciation in birds: Genes, geography, and sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6550-6557.
32. Eisenberg, J. F. 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics. Vol. 1. The northern Neotropics: Panama, Columbia, Venezuela, Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
33. Eisenberg, J. F., and K. H. Redford. 1999. Mammals of the Neotropics. Vol. 3. The central Neotropics: Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
34. FAUNMAP Working Group. 1996. Spatial response of mammals to late Quaternary environmental fluctuations. Science 272:1601-1606.
35. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
36. _. 2003. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package). Vers. 3.5. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
37. Fitzpatrick, B. M. 2002. Molecular correlates of reproductive isolation. Evolution 56:191-198.
38. Fumagalli, L., P. Taberlet, D. T. Stewart, L. Gielly, J. Hausser, and P. Vogel. 1999. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of Sorex shrews (Soricidae: Insectivora) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11:222-235.
39. Futuyma, D. J. 1998. Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
40. Gannon, W. L., and T. E. Lawlor. 1989. Variation in the chip vocalization of three species of Townsend chipmunks (genus Eutamias). J. Mammal. 70:740-753.
41. Gavrilets, S. 2005. "Adaptive speciation"-it is not that easy: a reply to Doebeli et al. Evolution 59:696-699.
42. George, S. B. 1988. Systematics, historical biogeography, and evolution of the genus Sorex. J. Mammal. 69:443-461.
43. Gleason, H. A. 1926. The individualistic concept of plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53:7-26.
44. Gould, S. J. 2002, The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap, Cambridge, U.K.
45. Grinnell, J. 1914. The Colorado River as a hindrance to the dispersal of species. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zoology 12:100-107.
46. _. 1924. Geography and evolution. Ecology 5:225-229.
47. _. 1927. Geography and evolution in the pocket gopher. Univ. Calif. Chron. 28:247-262.
48. Gulick, J. T. 1905. Evolution, racial and habitudinal. Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC.
49. Hafner, M. S. 1991. Evolutionary genetics and zoogeography of Middle American pocket gophers, genus Orthogeomys. J. Mammal. 72:1-10.
50. Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America. Vol. I and II. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ.
51. Haltenorth, T., and H. Diller. 1980. A field guide to the mammals of Africa including Madagascar. Collins, London.
52. Hamilton, M. J., R. K. Chesser, and T. L. Best. 1987. Genetic variation in the Texas kangaroo rat Dipodomys elator Merriam. J. Mammal. 68:775-781.
53. Herron, M. D., T. A. Castoe, and C. L. Parkinson. 2004. Sciurid phylogeny and the paraphyly of Holarctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:1015-1030.
54. Isaac, N. J. B., J. Mallet, and G. M. Mace. 2004. Taxonomic in-flation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:464-469.
55. Johnson, W. E., and S. J. O'Brien. 1997. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Felidae using 16S rDNA and NADH-5 mitochondrial genes. J. Mol. Evol. 44:S98-S116.
56. Johnson, W. E., and R. K. Selander. 1971. Protein variation and systematics in kangaroo rats (genus Dipodomys). Syst. Zool. 20:377-405.
57. Jolley, T. W., R. L. Honeycutt, and R. D. Bradley. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of the pocket gophers (genus Geomys) based on the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. J. Mammal. 81:1025-1034.
58. Jordan, D. S. 1905. The origin of species through isolation. Science 22:545-562.
59. _. 1908. The law of geminate species. Am. Nat. 42:73-80.
60. Klicka, J., and R. M. Zink. 1997. The importance of recent Ice Ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. Science 277:1666-1669.
61. Kohn, D. 1985. Darwin's principle of divergence as internal dialog. Pp. 245-267 in D. Kohn, ed. The Darwinian heritage. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
62. Kottler, M. J. 1978. Charles Darwin's biological species concept and the theory of geographical speciation: The transmutation notebooks. Ann. Sci. 35:275-297.
63. Lessa, E. P., J. A. Cook, and J. L. Patton. 2003. Genetic footprints of demographic expansion in North America, but not Amazonia, during the Late Quaternary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:10331-10334.
64. Letcher, A. J., A. Purvis, S. Nee, and P. H. Harvey. 1994. Patterns of overlap in the geographic ranges of Palearctic and British mammals. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:871-879.
65. Levenson, H., R. S. Hoffmann, C. F. Nadler, L. Deutsch, and S. D. Freeman. 1985. Systematics of the Holarctic chipmunks (Tamias). J. Mammal. 66:219-242.
66. Losos, J. B., and R. E. Glor. 2003. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:220-227.
67. Lynch, J. D. 1989. The gauge of speciation: on the frequency of modes of speciation. Pp. 527-553 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
68. Lyons, S. K. 2003. A quantitative assessment if the range shifts of Pleistocene mammals. J. Mammal. 84:385-402.
69. Maddison, W. P., and M. Slatkin. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45:1184-1197.
70. Martin, P. R., and J. K. McKay. 2004. Latitudinal variation in genetic divergence of populations and the potential for future speciation. Evolution 58:938-945.
71. Mattern, M. Y., and D. H. McLennan. 2000. Phylogeny and speciation of felids. Cladistics 16:232-253.
72. Mayr, E. 1959. Isolation as an evolutionary factor. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 103:221-230.
73. _. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap, Cambridge,.U.K.
74. _. 1992. Darwin's principle of divergence. J. Hist. Biol. 25:342-359.
75. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283-292.
76. Nowell, K., and P. Jackson. 1996. Wild cats: status survey and conservation action plan. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Gland, Switzerland.
77. Odachi, S., N. E. Dokuchaev, M. Hasegawa, and R. Masuda. 2001. Intraspecific phylogeny and geographical variation of six species of northeastern Asiatic Sorex shrews based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. Mol. Ecol. 10:2199-2213.
78. Orr, H. A., and M. Turelli. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1085-1094.
79. Ospovat, D. 1981. The development of Darwin's theory. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
80. Palumbi, S. R., and H. A. Lessios. 2005. Evolutionary animation: how do molecular phylogenies compare to Mayr's reconstruction of speciation patterns in the sea? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6566-6572.
81. Patton, J. L., and M. N. F. da Silva. 1998. Rivers, refuges, and ridges: the geography of speciation in Amazonian mammals. Pp. 202-213 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
82. Patton, J. L., and M. F. Smith. 1981. Molecular evolution in Thomomys: phyletic systematics, paraphyly, and rates of evolution. J. Mammal. 62:493-500.
83. Patton, J. L., S. W. Sherwood, and S. Y. Yang. 1981. Biochemical systematics of chaetodipine pocket mice, genus Perognathus. J. Mammal. 62:477-492.
84. Piaggio, A. J., and G. S. Spicer. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the chipmunk genus Tamias based on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit II gene. J. Mammalol. Evol. 7:147-166.
85. _. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the chipmunks inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase II gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20:335-350.
86. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
87. Poulton, E. B. 1908. Essays on evolution, 1889-1907. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
88. Rebholz, W., and E. Harley. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships in the Bovid subfamily Antilopinae based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12:87-94.
89. Redford, K. H., and J. F. Eisenberg. 1992. Mammals of the Neotropics. Vol. 2. The southern cone: Chile, Argentina, Uruguay. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
90. Ribera, I., T. G. Barraclough, and A. P. Vogler. 2001. The effect of habitat type on speciation rates and range movements in aquatic beetles: inferences from species-level phylogenies. Mol. Ecol. 10:721-735.
91. Rieseberg, L. H., and J. F. Wendel. 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants, Pp. 70-109 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
92. Ruedi, M., and F. Mayer. 2001. Molecular systematics of bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) suggests deterministic ecomorphological convergence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21:436-448.
93. Sanderson, M. J. 1997. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1218-1231.
94. _. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:101-109.
95. Schmidly, D. J., K. T. Wilkins, and J. N. Derr. 1993. Biogeography. Pp. 319-356 in H. H. Genoways and J. H. Brown, eds. Biology of the Heteromyidae. American Society of Mammalogists, Special Publ. No. 10.
96. Shaw, K. L. 2002. Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16122-16127.
97. Smith, A. T., N. A. Formozov, R. S. Hoffmann, C. Zheng, and M. A. Erbajeva. 1990. The pikas. Pp. 14-60 in J. A. Chapman and J. E. C. Flux, eds. Rabbits, hares, and pikas: status survey and conservation action plan. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Gland, Switzerland.
98. Smith, J. D. 1972. Systematics of the chiropteran family Mormoopidae. Univ. Kans. Mus. Nat. Hist. Misc. Publ. No. 56.
99. Smith, M. F. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships and geographic structure in pocket gophers in the genus Thomomys. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1-14.
100. Smith, T. B., R. K. Wayne, D. J. Girman, and M. W. Bruford. 1997. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276:1855-1857.
101. Stauffer, R. C. 1975. Charles Darwin's Natural Selection. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
102. Sulloway, F. J. 1979. Geographic isolation in Darwin's thinking: the vicissitudes of a crucial idea. Stud. Hist. Biol. 3:23-65.
103. Sunquist, M., and F. Sunquist. 2002. Wild cats of the world. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
104. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Vers. 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
105. Tiemann-Boege, I., C. W. Kilpatrick, D. J. Schmidly, and R. D. Bradley. 2000. Molecular phylogenetics of the Peromyscus boylii species group (Rodentia: Muridae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16:366-378.
106. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:330-343.
107. Van Den Bussche, R. A., S. R. Hoofer, and N. B. Simmons. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Mormoopid bats using mitochondrial gene sequences and morphology. J. Mammal. 83:40-48.
108. Vogler, A. P. 2001. The genic view: a useful model of the process of speciation? Commentary. J. Evol. Biol. 14:876-877.
109. Wallace, A. R. 1852. On the monkeys of the Amazon. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 20:107-110.
110. _. 1855. On the law which has regulated the introduction of new species. Ann. Magazine Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, 16:184-196.
111. Wiens, J. J. 2004. Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution 58:193-197.
112. Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley, New York.
113. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder. 1993. Mammal species of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
114. Yu, N., C. Zheng, Y.-P. Zhang, and W.-H. Li. 2000. Molecular systematics of pikas (Genus Ochotona) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16:85-95.