Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: A critical reevaluation

American Naturalist

Volumn 163, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 709-725

  Van Doorn, G Sander ^a   Dieckmann, Ulf ^b,c   Weissing, Franz J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Evolutionary branching; Fisherian runaway; Frequency dependent disruptive selection; Individual based simulations; Male male competition; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 2642531217     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/383619     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Almeida, C. R., and F. Vistulo de Abreu. 2003. Dynamical instabilities lead to sympatric speciation. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5:739-757.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
3. Bakker, T. C. M. 1990. Genetic variation in female mating preference. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 40:617-642.
4. Bulmer, M. 1989. Structural instability of models of sexual selection. Theoretical Population Biology 35:195-206.
5. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
6. Dieckmann, U., and R. Law. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. Journal of Mathematical Biology 34:579-612.
7. Dieckmann, U., M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz, eds. 2004. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist 156(suppl.):S77-S101.
9. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
11. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
12. Gavrilets, S., and D. Waxman. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:10533-10538.
13. Geritz, S. A. H., É. Kisdi, G. Meszéna, and J. A. J. Metz. 1998. Evolutionary singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evolutionary Ecology 12:35-57.
14. Geritz, S. A. H., M. Gyllenberg, F. J. A. Jacobs, and K. Parvinen. 2002. Invasion dynamics and attractor inheritance. Journal of Mathematical Biology 44:548-560.
15. Higashi, M., G. Takimoto, and N. Yamamura. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402:523-526.
16. Johnson, P. A., and U. Gullberg. 1998. Theory and models of sympatric speciation. Pages 79-89 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female preferences. Evolution 36:1-12.
18. _. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:43-70.
19. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334.
20. _. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78:3721-3725.
21. Lande, R., O. Seehausen, and J. J. M. van Alphen. 2001. Mechanisms of rapid sympatric speciation by sex reversal and sexual selection in cichlid fish. Genetica 112-113:435-443.
22. Leimar, O. 2001. Evolutionary change and Darwinian demons. Selection 2:65-72.
23. Meszéna, G., and J. A. J. Metz. In press. The role of effective environmental dimensionality. In U. Dieckmann and J. A. J. Metz, eds. Elements of adaptive dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
24. Metz, J. A. J., S. A. H. Geritz, G. Meszéna, F. J. A. Jacobs, and J. S. van Heerwaarden. 1996. Adaptive dynamics, a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. Pages 147-194 in S. J. van Strien and S. M. Verduyn Lunel, eds. Stochastic and spatial structures of dynamical systems. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam.
25. Panhuis, T. M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk, and T. Tregenza. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:364-371.
26. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. 1992. Numerical recipes in C. 2d ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:372-380.
28. Seehausen, O., J. J. M. van Alphen, and F. Witte. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277:1808-1811.
29. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier. 1998. Concerted evolution in an egg receptor for a rapidly evolving abalone sperm protein. Science 281:710-712.
30. Takimoto, G. 2002. Polygenic inheritance is not necessary for sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Population Ecology 44:87-91.
31. Takimoto, G., M. Higashi, and N. Yamamura. 2000. A deterministic genetic model for sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 54:1870-1881.
32. Vacquier, V. D. 1998. Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science 281:1995-1998.
33. van Doorn, G. S., and F. J. Weissing. 2001. Ecological versus sexual selection models of sympatric speciation: a synthesis. Selection 2:17-40.
34. van Doorn, G. S., A. J. Noest, and P. Hogeweg. 1998. Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:1915-1919.
35. van Doorn, G. S., P. C. Luttikhuizen, and F. J. Weissing. 2001. Sexual selection at the protein level drives the extraordinary divergence of sex-related genes during sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:2155-2161.
36. Verkiel, H. 2002. Male-male competition and sympatric speciation. M.S. thesis. University of Groningen.
37. Weissing, F. J. 1996. Genetic versus phenotypic models of selection: can genetics be neglected in a long-term perspective? Journal of Mathematical Biology 34:533-555.
38. Wilson, A. B., K. Noack-Kunnmann, and A. Meyer. 2000. Incipient speciation in sympatric Nicaraguan crater lake fishes: sexual selection versus ecological diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:2133-2141.
39. Wu, C.-I. 1985. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39:66-82.
40. Wyckoff, G. J., W. Wang, and C.-I. Wu. 2000. Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature 403:304-309.