Issues of terminology, gradient dynamics and the ease of sympatric speciation in adaptive dynamics

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1214-1219

  Waxman, D ^a   Gavrilets, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; NOMENCLATURE; NOTE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 28444443813     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00953.x     Document Type: Note

References (42)

1. Abrams, P.A. 2005. Adaptive Dynamics' vs. 'adaptive dynamics'. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1162-1165.
2. Abrams, P.A., Harada, Y. & Matsuda, H. 1993. On the relationship between ESS and quantitative genetic models. Evolution 47: 982-985.
3. Barton, N.H. & Polechová, J. 2005. The limitations of adaptive dynamics as a model of evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 00: 00-00.
4. Polechová, J. & Barton, N.H. Speciation through competition: a critical review. Evolution (in press).
5. Bolnick, D.I. 2004. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58: 895-899.
6. Butlin, R.K. & Tregenza, T. 2005. The way the world might be. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1205-1208.
7. Christiansen, F.B. & Loeschcke, V. 1980. Evolution and intraspecific exploitative competition I. One-locus theory for small additive gene effects. Theor. Pop. Biol. 18: 297-313.
8. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA, USA.
9. Dieckmann, U. & Law, R. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34: 579-612.
10. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 354-357.
11. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. 2005. Pluralism in evolutionary theory. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1209-1213.
12. Diekmann, O., Gyllenberg, M. & Metz, J.A.J. 2003. Steady state analysis of structured population models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 63: 309-338.
13. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2003. Speciation along environmental gradient. Nature 421: 259-264.
14. Doebeli, M & Dieckmann, U. 2005. Adaptive dynamics as a mathematical tool for studying the ecology of speciation processes. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1194-1200.
15. Gavrilets, S. 2005. 'Adaptive speciation': it is not that simple. Evolution 53: 696-699.
16. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species, 476 pp. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA (Monographs in Population Biology series).
17. Gavrilets, S. & Boake, C.R.B. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. Am. Nat. 152: 706-716.
18. Gavrilets, S. & Waxman, D. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 10533-10538.
19. Geritz, S & Gyllenberg, M. 2005. Seven answers from adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1174-1177.
20. Gourbiere, S., 2004. How do natural and sexual selection contribute to sympatric speciation? J. Evol. Biol. 17: 1297-1309.
21. Gourbiere, S. & Mallet, J. 2005. Has adaptive dynamics contributed to the understanding of adaptive and sympatric speciation? J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1201-1204.
22. Higgs, P.G. & Derrida, B. 1992. Genetic distance and species formation in evolving populations. J. Mol. Evol. 35: 454-465.
23. Iwasa, I., Pomiankowski, A. & Nee, S. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The 'handicap' principle. Evolution 45: 1431-1442.
24. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283-327.
25. Kimura, M. 1957. Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. A. Math. Stat. 28: 882-901.
26. Kirkpatrick, M. & Nuismer, S.L. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B271: 687-693.
27. Kirkpatrick, M. & Rousset, F. 2005. Wright meets AD not all landscapes are adaptive. J. Evol. Biol. xx: xx-xx.
28. Kisdi, E. & Gyllenberg, M. 2005. Adaptive dynamics and the paradigm of diversity. J. Evol. Biol. xx: xx-xx.
29. Kokko, H. 2005. Useful ways of being wrong. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1155-1157.
30. Kondrashov, A.S. 1983a. Multiolcus model of sympatric speciation. I. One character. Theor. Pop. Biol. 24: 121-135.
31. Kondrashov, A.S. 1983b. Multiolcus model of sympatric speciation. II. Two character. Theor. Pop. Biol. 24: 136-144.
32. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314-334.
33. Matessi, C., Gimelfarb, A. & Gavrilets, S. 2001. Long term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection 2: 41-64.
34. Meszéna, G. 2005. Adaptive dynamics: the continuity argument. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1182-1185.
35. Metz, J.A.J. 2005. Eight personal rules for doing science. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1178-1181.
36. Orr, H.A. & Coyne, J.A. 1992. The genetics of adaptation: a reassessment. Am. Nat. 140: 725-742.
37. Pomiankowski, A. 1987. The costs of choice in sexual selection. J. Theor. Biol 128: 195-218.
38. Rice, W.R. 1984. Disruptive selection on habitat preferences and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 38: 1251-1260.
39. Spencer, H.G. & Feldman, M. 2005. Adaptive dynamics, game theory and evolutionary population genetics. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1191-1193.
40. Van Dooren, T.J.M. 2005. The future of a mutation-limited toolbox. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1158-1161.
41. Waxman, D. & Gavrilets, S. 2005. 20 Questions on Adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1139-1154.
42. Wu, C.-I. 1985. A stochastic simulation study of speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39: 66-82.