Multilocus genetic analysis of host use, introgression, and speciation in host strains of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1034-1044

  Prowell, Dorothy Pashley ^a   McMichael, Margaret ^a   Silvain, Jean François ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AFLP; Allozymes; Host specificity; Hybridization; mtDNA; Spodoptera frugiperda

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; HOST SPECIFICITY; HOST USE; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

LEPIDOPTERA; MYTHIMNA UNIPUNCTA; NOCTUIDAE; POACEAE; SPODOPTERA; SPODOPTERA FIUGIPERDA; SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA; ZEA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 8144230019     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[1034:MGAOHU]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. [b Adamczyk, J. R., D. P. Prowell, and J.-F. Silvain. 1996. b] Intraand interspecific DNA variation in a sodium channel intron in [i Spodoptera i] (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89: 812-821.
2. [b Arnold, M. L., and S. K. Emms. 1998. b] Paradigm lost: natural hybridization and evolutionary innovations, pp. 379-389. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
3. [b Beardsley, P. M., A. Yen, and R. G. Olmstead. 2003. AFLP b] phylogeny of [i Mimulus i] section [i Erythranthe i] and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57: 1397-1410.
4. [b Beismann, H., J.H.A. Barker, A. Karp, and T. Speck. 1997. b] AFLP analysis sheds light on distribution of two [i Salix i] species and their hybrid along a natural gradient. Mol. Ecol. 6: 989-993.
5. [b Beltran, M., C. D. Jiggins, V. Bull, M. Linares, J. Mallet, W. O. McMillan, and E. Bermingham. 2002. b] Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating [i Heliconius i] butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 2176-2190.
6. [b Bensch, S., S. Akesson, and D. E. Irwin. 2002. b] The use of AFLP to find an informative SNP: genetic differences across a migratory divide in willow warblers. Mol. Ecol. 11: 2359-2366.
7. [b Berlocher, S. H., and J. L. Feder. 2002. b] Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 773-815.
8. [b Bert, T. M., K. J. McCarthy, H. C. Lopez, and S. Bogdanowicz. 1996. b] Character discriminatory power, character-set congruence, and the classification of individuals from hybrid zones: an example using stone crabs ([i Menippe i]). Evolution 50: 655-671.
9. [b Boecklen, W. J., and D. J. Howard. 1997. b] Genetic analysis of hybrid zones: numbers of markers and power of resolution. Ecology 78: 2611-2616.
10. [b Crochet, P.-A., J. Z. Chen, J.-M. Pons, J.-D. Lebreton, P.D.N. Hebert, and F. Bonhomme. 2003. b] Genetic differentiation at nuclear and mitochondrial loci among large white-headed gulls: sex-biased interspecific gene flow? Evolution 57: 2865-2878.
11. [b De Queiroz, K. 1998. b] The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations, pp. 57-75. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
12. [b Dres, M., and J. Mallet. 2002. b] Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 357: 471-492.
13. [b Emelianov, I., F. Marec, and J. Mallet. 2004. b] Genomic evidence for divergence with gene flow in host races of the larch budmoth. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 271: 97-105.
14. [b Epifanio, J. M., and D. P. Philipp. 1997. b] Sources for misclassifying genealogical origins in mixed hybrid populations. J. Hered. 88: 62-65.
15. [b Feder, J. 1998. b] The apple maggot fly, [i Rhagoletis pomonella i]. Flies in the face of conventional wisdom about speciation?, pp. 130-144. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.]. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
16. [b Funk, D. J., K. E. Filchak, and Jeffrey L. Feder. 2002. b] Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116: 251-267.
17. [b Harrison, R. G. 1993a. b] Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
18. [b Harrison, R. G. 1993b. b] Hybrids and hybrid zones: historical perspective, pp. 3-12. [i In i] R. G. Harrison [ed.], Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
19. [b Harrison, R. G. 1998. b] Linking evolutionary pattern and process: the relevance of species concepts for the study of speciation, pp. 19-31. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
20. [b Harrison, R. G., and S. M. Bogdanowicz. 1997. b] Patterns of variation and linkage disequilibrium in a field cricket hybrid zone. Evolution 51: 493-505.
21. [b Harrison, R. G., and D. M. Rand. 1989. b] Mosaic hybrid zones and the nature of species boundaries, pp. 111-133. [i In i] D. Otte and J. A. Endler [eds.], Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
22. [b Hey, J. 2001. b] The mind of the species problem. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 326-329.
23. [b Howard, D. J. 1998. b] Unanswered questions and future directions in the study of speciation, pp. 439-448. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.]. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
24. [b Howard, D. J., and S. H. Berlocher [eds.]. 1998. b] Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
25. [b Howard, D. J., R. W. Preszler, and J. Williams. 1997. b] How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between [i Quercus grisea i] and [i Quercus gamelii i]. Evolution 51: 747-755.
26. [b Howard, D. J., M. Reece, P. G. Gregory, J. Chu, and M. L. Cain. 1998. b] The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms, pp. 279-288. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.]. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
27. [b Jiggins, C. D., and J. Mallet. 2000. b] Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 250-255.
28. [b Lu, Y., and M. J. Adang. 1996. b] Distinguishing fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) strains using a diagnostic mitochondrial DNA marker. Fla. Entomol. 79: 48-55.
29. [b Lu, Y., M. J. Adang, D. J. Isenhour, and G. D. Kochert. 1992. RFLP b] analysis of genetic variation in North American populations of the fall armyworm moth [i Spodoptera frugiperda i] (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Mol. Ecol. 1: 199-208.
30. [b Lu, Y.-L., G. D. Kochert, D. J. Isenhour, and M. J. Adang. 1994. b] Molecular characterization of a strain-specific repeated DNA sequence in the fall armyworm, [i Spodoptera frugiperda i] (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insect Mol. Biol. 3: 123-130.
31. [b Luginbill, P. 1928. b] The fall armyworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 34: 1-91.
32. [b Machado, C. A., R. M. Kliman, J. A. Markert, and J. Hey. 2002. b] Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of [i Drosophila pseudoobscura i] and close relatives. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 472-488.
33. [b McMichael, M., and D. P. Prowell. 1999. b] Differences inamplified fragment length polymorphisms in fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host strains. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 175-181.
34. [b Meagher, R. L., and M. Gallo-Meagher. 2003. b] Identifying host strains of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Florida using mitochondrial markers. Fla. Entomol. 86: 450-455.
35. [b Moritz, C., T. E. Dowling, and W. M. Brown. 1987. b] Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 269 -292.
36. [b Nagoshi, R. N., and R. Meagher. 2003. b] Fall armyworm [i FR i] sequences map to sex chromosomes and their distribution in the wild indicate limitations in interstrain mating. Insect Mol. Biol. 12: 453-458.
37. [b Nason, J. D., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1993. b] Estimating the frequencies of genetically distinct classes of individuals in hybridized populations. J. Hered. 84: 1-12.
38. [b Navarro, A., and N. H. Barton. 2003. b] Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence - accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes. Science (Wash. DC) 300: 321-324.
39. [b Pashley, D. P. 1986. b] Host associated genetic differentiation in fall armyworm: a sibling species complex? Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 898-904.
40. [b Pashley, D. P. 1988. b] Quantitative genetics, development and physiological adaptation in sympatric host strains of fall armyworm. Evolution 42: 93-102.
41. [b Pashley, D. P. 1989. b] Host-associated differentiation in armyworms: an allozymic and mtDNA perspective, pp. 103-114. [i In i] H. Loxdale and M. F. Claridge [eds.], Electrophoretic studies on agricultural pests. Oxford University Press, London, United Kingdom.
42. [b Pashley, D. P., and L. D. Ke. 1992. b] Sequence evolution in mitochondrial ribosomal and ND-1 genes in Lepidoptera: implications for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9: 1061-1075.
43. [b Pashley, D. P., and J. A. Martin. 1987. b] Reproductive incompatibility between host strains of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80: 731-733.
44. [b Pashley, D. P., S. J. Johnson, and A. N. Sparks. 1985. b] Genetic population structure of migratory moths: the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78: 756-762.
45. [b Pashley, D. P., T. C. Sparks, S. S. Quisenberry, T. Jamjanya, and P. Dowd. 1987. b] Two fall armyworm strains feed on corn, rice and bermuda grass. Louisiana Agric. 30: 8-9.
46. [b Pashley, D. P., A. M. Hammond, and T. N. Hardy. 1992. b] Reproductive isolating mechanisms in fall armyworm host strains. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85: 400-405.
47. [b Pashley, D. P., T. N. Hardy, and A. M. Hammond. 1995. b] Host effects on developmental and reproductive traits in fall armyworm strains (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 748-755.
48. [b Prowell, D. P. 1998. b] Sex linkage and speciation in Lepidoptera, pp. 309-319. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
49. [b Quisenberry, S. S. 1991. b] Fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host strain reproductive compatibility. Fla. Entomol. 74: 194-199.
50. [b Rice, W. 1998. b] Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation, pp. 261-270. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
51. [b Richie, M. G., and S.D.F. Phillips. 1998. b] The genetics of sexual isolation, pp. 291-308. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
52. [b Rolan-Alvarez, E., K. Johannesson, and J. Erlandsson. 1997. b] The maintenance of a cline in the marine snail [i Littorina saxatilis i]: the role of home site advantage and hybrid fitness. Evolution 51: 1838-1847.
53. [b Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook. 1994. b] Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651-716.
54. [b Sperling, F.A.H. 1994. b] Sex-linked genes and species differences in Lepidoptera. Can. Entomol. 126: 807-818.
55. [b Sperling, F. 2003. b] Butterfly molecular systematics: from species definition to higher-level phylogenies, pp. 431-458. [i In i] C. L. Boggs, W. B. Watt, and P. R. Ehrlich [eds.], Butterflies, ecology, and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
56. [b Suazo, A., and H. G. Hall. 1999. b] Modification of the AFLP protocol applied to honey bee ([i Apis mellifera i] L.) DNA. Biotechniques 26: 704-709.
57. [b Swofford, D. L., and R. B. Selander. 1981. b] BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered. 72: 281-283.
58. [b Veenstra, K. H., D. P. Pashley, and J. A. Ottea. 1995. b] Hostplant adaptation in fall armyworm host strains: comparison of food consumption, utilization, and detoxification enzyme activities. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 80-91.
59. [b Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP b]: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
60. [b Whitford, F., S. S. Quisenberry, T. J. Riley, and J. W. Lee. 1988. b] Oviposition preference, mating compatibility, and development of two fall armyworm strains. Fla. Entomol. 71: 234-243.
61. [b Wu, C.-I., and H. Hollocher. 1998. b] Subtle is nature: the genetics of species differentiation and speciation, pp. 339-351. [i In i] D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.