Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 774-780

  May, Andreas ^a   Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anisotropic network model; Docking minimization; Induced fit; Protein protein complex formation; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLATION FACTOR 1; ARF1GTPASE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BINDING PROTEIN; DOCKING PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; HEMK ENZYME; LIGASE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; METHYLTRANSFERASE; ORIGIN RECOGNITION COMPLEX; PROTEIN ARFBD; PROTEIN HIP2; PROTEIN ORC1; PROTEIN PAL; PROTEIN RF1; PROTEIN SIR1; PROTEIN TOLB; PROTEIN UBC9; RELEASING FACTOR; SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANISOTROPY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DIMERIZATION; GENOMICS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

RUMEX;

EID: 36749035257     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21735     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Janin J. Welcome to CAPRI; a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2002;47:257.
2. Wodak SJ, Mendez R. Prediction of protein-protein interactions: the CAPRI experiment, its evaluation and implications. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:242-249.
3. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
4. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003;12:1271-1282.
5. Zacharias M. ATTRACT: protein-protein docking in CAPRI using a reduced protein model. Proteins 2005;60:252-256.
6. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
7. Zacharias M. Rapid Protein-ligand docking including soft degrees of freedom from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein flexibility: FK506 binding to FKBP binding protein as an example. Proteins 2004;54:759-767.
8. May A, Zacharias M. Accounting for protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005;1754:225-231.
9. May A, Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins, E-pub ahead of print; 10.1002/prot.21579.
10. Tirion MM. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996;77:1905-1908.
11. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997;2:173-181.
12. Hinsen K. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins 1998;33:417-429.
13. Tama F, Sanejouand YH. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng 2001;14:1-6.
14. Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:18908-18913.
15. Bahar I, Rader EJ. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:586-592.
16. Lindahl E, Delarue M. Refinement of docked protein-ligand and protein-DNA structures using low-frequency normal mode amplitude optimization. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:4496-4506.
17. Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997;18:2714-2723.
18. Case D, Pearlman DA, Caldwell JW, Cheatham III, TE, Ross WS, Simmerling CL, Darden TA, Merz KM, Stanton RV, Cheng AL, Vincent JJ, Crowley M, Tsui V, Radmer RJ, Duan Y, Pitera J, Massova I, Seibel GL, Singh UC, Weiner PK, Kollman PA. Amber 8. University of California, 2003, San Francisco.
19. Frolova LY, Tsivkovskii RY, Sivolobova GF, Oparina NY, Serpinsky OI, Blinov VM, Tatkov SI, Kisselev LL. Mutations in the highly conserved GGQ motif of class 1 polypeptide release factors abolish ability of human eRF1 to trigger peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. RNA 1999;5:1014-1020.
20. Graille M, Heurgue-Hamard V, Champ S, Mora L, Scrima N, Ulryck N, van Tilbeurgh H, Buckingham RH. Molecular basis for bacterial class I release factor methylation by PrmC. Mol Cell 2005;20:917-927.
21. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3381-3385.
22. Bastard K, Prevost C, Zacharias M. Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking. Proteins 2006;62:956-969.
23. Hou Z, Bernstein D, Fox CA, Keck JL. Structural basis of the Sir1-origin recognition complex interaction in transcriptional silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:8489-8494.
24. Zhang Z, Hayashi MK, Merkel O, Stillman B, Xu RM. Structure and function of the BAH-containing domain of Orc1p in epigenetic silencing. EMBO J 2002;21:4600-4611.
25. Gardner KA, Rine J, Fox CA. A region of the Sir1 protein dedicated to recognition of a silencer and required for interaction with Orc1 protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1999;151:31-44.
26. Bonsor DA, Grishkovskaya I, Dodson EJ, Kleanthous C. Molecular mimicry enables competitive recruitment by natively disordered protein. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129:4800-4807.
27. Walker JR, Awakumov GV, Xue S, Newman EM, Mackenzie F, Weigelt J, Sundstrom M, Arrowsmith CH, Edwards AM, Bochkarev A, Dhe-Paganon SA. Novel and unexpected complex between the SUMO-1-conjugating enzyme UBC9 and the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25 kDa, in press.
28. Menetrey J, Perderiset M, Cicolari J, Dubois T, Elkhatib N, El Khadali F, Franco M, Chavrier P, Houdusse A. Structural basis for ARF1-mediated recruitment of ARHGAP21 to Golgi membranes. EMBO J 2007;26:1953-1962.
29. Ray MC, Germon P, Vianney A, Portalier R, Lazzaroni JC. Identification by genetic suppression of Escherichia coli TolB residues important for TolB-Pal interaction. J Bacteriol 2000;182:821-824.
30. Cascales E, Lloubes R. Deletion analyses of the peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein Pal reveals three independent binding sequences including a TolA box. Mol Microbiol 2004;51:873-885.
31. Pichler A, Knipscheer P, Oberhofer E, van Dijk WJ, Korner R, Velgaard Olsen J, Jentsch S, Melchior F, Sixma TK. SUMO modification of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K. Nat Struct Biol 2005;12:264-269.
32. Kannan S, Zacharias M. Enhanced sampling of peptide and protein conformations using replica exchange simulations with a peptide backbone biasing-potential. Proteins 2007;66:697-706.
33. Riemann N, Zacharias M. Refinement of protein cores and protein-peptide interfaces using a potential scaling approach. Protein Eng 2005;18:465-476.