Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 794-809

  May, Andreas ^a   Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collective degrees of freedom; Conformational change; Gaussian network modes; Molecular docking; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENERGY TRANSFER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; APOPROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 38549097715     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21579     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Ehrlich LP, Wade RC. Protein-protein docking. Rev Comput Chem 2001;17:1761-1797.
2. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
3. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
4. Bonvin AA. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:194-200.
5. May A, Zacharias M. Accounting for protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005;1754:225-231.
6. Teodoro ML, Phillips GN, Kavraki LE.Molecular docking: a problem with thousands of degrees of freedom. Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seoul, Korea, May 2001. pp 960-965.
7. Adock SA, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev 2006;106:1589-1615.
8. Fernandez-Recio J, Trotov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global optimization with fully flexible side chains. Proteins 2003;52: 113-117.
9. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Baker D. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with improved side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2005;187-194.
10. Dominguez C, Bodens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:1731-1737.
11. van Dijk AD, Kaptein R, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. Combining NMR relaxation with chemical shift perturbation data to drive protein-protein docking. J Biomol NMR 2006;34:237-244.
12. Jiang F, Kim S. Soft docking: matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 1991;219:79-102.
13. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 1991;221:327-346.
14. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
15. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 1994;34:933-940.
16. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
17. Vakser IA. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins 1997;1: 226-230.
18. Palma PN, Krippahl L, Wampler JE, Moura JJ. Bigger: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins 2000;39:372-384.
19. Richie DW, Kemp GJ. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 2000;39:178-194.
20. Chen R, Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation and electrostatics. Proteins 2002;47:281-294.
21. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Proteins Sci 2003;12: 1271-1282.
22. Li L, Chen R, Weng Z. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 2003;53:693-707.
23. Leach AR. Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain Flexibility. J Mol Biol 1994;235:345-356.
24. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
25. Jackson RM, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJE. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285.
26. Camacho CJ, Vajda S. Protein docking along smooth association pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10636-10641.
27. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
28. Abagyan R, Totrov M, Kuznetsov D. ICM - a new method for protein modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from distorted native conformation. J Comp Chem 1994;15:488-506.
29. Knegtel RMA, Kuntz ID, Oshiro CM. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. J Mol Biol 1997;266:424-440.
30. Carlson HA, McCammon JA. Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. Mol Pharmacol 2000;57:213-218.
31. Claussen H, Buning C, Rarey M, Lengauer T. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. J Mol Biol 2001;308:377-395.
32. Osterberg F, Morris GM, Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS- Automated docking to multiple target structures: incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins 2002;6:34-40.
33. Carlson HA, Masukawa KM, McCammon JA. Method for including the dynamic fluctuations of a protein in computer-aided drug design. J Phys Chem A 1999;103:10213-10219.
34. Lin JH, Perryman AL, Schames JR, McCammon JA. Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:5632-5633.
35. Sandak B, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. A method for biomolecular structural recognition and docking allowing conformational flexibility. J Comput Biol 1998;5:631-654.
36. Sandak B, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: insights from an open to closed conformational isomers. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 1998;32:159-174.
37. Bastard K, Thureau A, Lavery R, Prévost C. Docking macromolecules with flexible segments. J Comput Chem 2003;24:1910-1920.
38. Bastard K, Prévost C, Zacharias M. Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2006; 62:956-969.
39. Zacharias M, Sklenar H. Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility in ligand-receptor docking simulations: applications to DNA minor groove ligand complex. J Comput Chem 1999;20:287-300.
40. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:412-425.
41. Zacharias M. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2004; 54:759-767.
42. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005;347:1077-1101.
43. Tirion MM. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996;77:1905-1908.
44. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997;2:173-181.
45. Hinsen K. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins 1998;33:417-429.
46. Tama F, Sanejouand YH. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng 2001;14:1-6.
47. Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:18908-18913.
48. Lindahl E, Delarue M. Refinement of docked protein-ligand and protein-DNA structures using low-frequency normal mode amplitude optimization. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:4496-4506.
49. Cavasotto CN, Kovacs JA, Abagyan RA. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:9632-9640.
50. Kobe B, Deisenhofer J. A structural basis of the interactions between leucine-rich repeats and protein ligands. Nature 1995;374: 183-186.
51. Kobe B, Deisenhofer J. Mechanism of ribonuclease inhibition by ribonuclease inhibitor protein based on the crystal structure of its complex with ribonuclease A. J Mol Biol 1996;264:1028-1043.
52. Nachman J, Miller M, Gilliland GL, Carty R, Pincus M, Wlodawer A. Crystal structure of two covalent nucleoside derivatives of ribonuclease A. Biochemistry 1990;29:928-937.
53. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: A critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
54. Sansen S, De Ranter CJ, Gebruers K, Brijs K, Courtin CM, Delcour JA, Rabijns A. Structural basis for inhibition of Aspergillus niger xylanase by triticum aestivum xylanase inhibitor-I. J Biol Chem 2004;279:36022-36028.
55. Krengel U, Dijkstra BW. Three-dimensional structure of Endo-1,4-β-xylanase I from Aspergillus niger: molecular basis for its low pH optimum. J Mol Biol 1996;263:70-78.
56. Sansen S, De Ranter CJ, Gebruers K, Brijs K, Courtin CM, Delcour JA, Rabijns, A. Structural basis for inhibition of Aspergillus niger xylanase by triticum aestivum xylanase inhibitor-I. J Biol Chem 2004;279:36022-36028.
57. Zhang Z, Hayahashi MK, Merkel O, Stillman B, Xu MR. Structure and function of the BAH containing domain of ORC1P in epigenetic silencing. EMBO J 2002;21:4600-4612.
58. Hou Z, Bernstein DA, Fox CA, Keck JL. Structural basis of the Sir1-origin recognition complex interaction in transcriptional silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:8489-8494.
59. Rini JM, Stanfield RL, Stura EA, Salinas PA, Profy AT, Wilson IA. Crystal structure of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralizing antibody, 50.1, in complex with its V3 loop peptide antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:6325-6329.
60. Stanfield RL, Takimoto-Kamimura M, Rini JM, Profy AT, Wilson IA. Major antigen-induced domain rearrangements in an antibody. Structure 1993;1:83-93.
61. Ternois F, Sticht J, Duquerroy S, Krausslich HG, Rey FA. The HIV-1 capsid protein C-terminal domain in Compl a virus assembly inhibitor. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005;12:678-706.
62. Worthylake DK, Wang H, Yoo S, Sundquist WI, Hill CP. Structures of the HIV-1 capsid protein dimerization domain at 26 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1999;55:85-92.
63. Sevcik J, Urbanikova L, Dauter Z, Wilson KS. Recognition of RNase Sa by the inhibitor barstar: structure of the complex at 1.7 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1998;54:954-963.
64. Sevcik J, Dauter Z, Lamzin VS, Wilson KS, Ribonuclease from Streptomyces aureofaciens at atomic resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1996;52:327-344.
65. Ratnaparkhi GS, Ramachandran S, Udgaonkar JB, Varadarajan R. Discrepancies between the NMR and X-ray structures of uncomplexed barstar: analysis suggests that packing densities of protein structures determined by NMR are unreliable. Biochemistry 1998; 37:6958-6966.
66. Frigerio F, Coda A, Pugliese L, Lionetti C, Menegatti E, Amiconi G, Schnebli HP, Ascenzi P, Bolognesi M. Crystal and molecular structure of the bovine α-chymotrypsin-eglin c complex at 2.0 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1992;225:107-123.
67. Wang D, Bode W, Huber R. Bovine chymotrypsinogen A X-ray crystal structure analysis and refinement of a new crystal form at 1.8 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1985;18:5595-624.
68. Hyberts SG, Goldberg MS, Havel TF, Wagner G. The solution structure of eglin c based on measurements of many NOEs and coupling constants and its comparison with X-ray structures. Protein Sci 1992;1:736-751.
69. Chen Z, Bode W. Refined 2.5 A X-ray crystal structure of the complex formed by porcine kallikrein A and the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Crystallization Patterson search, structure determination, refinement, structure and comparison with its components and with the bovine trypsin-pancreatic trypsin inhibitor complex. J Mol Biol 1983;164:283-311.
70. Bode W, Chen Z, Bartels K, Kutzbach C, Schmidt-Kastner G, Bartunik H. Refined 2 A X-ray crystal structure of porcine pancreatic kallikrein A, a specific trypsin-like serine proteinase. Crystallization, structure determination, crystallographic refinement, structure and its comparison with bovine trypsin. J Mol Biol 1983;164:237-282.
71. Friedrich R, Fuentes-Prior P, Ong E, Coombs G, Oehler M, Hunter R, Pierson D, Gonzalez R, Huber R, Bode W, Madison EL. Catalytic domain structures of Mt-Sp1/Matriptase, a matrix-degrading transmembrane serine proteinase. J Biol Chem 2001;277:2160-2173.
72. Muller JJ, Lapko A, Bourenkov G, Ruckpaul K, Heinemann U. Adrenodoxin reductase-adrenodoxin complex structure suggests electron transfer path in steroid biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:2786-2789.
73. Ziegler GA, Schulz GE. Crystal structures of adrenodoxin reductase in complex with NADP+ and NADPH suggesting a mechanism for the electron transfer of an enzyme family. Biochemistry 2000;39: 10986-10995.
74. Pikuleva IA, Tesh K, Waterman MR, Kim Y. The tertiary structure of full-length bovine adrenodoxin suggests functional dimers. Arch Biochem Biophys 2000;373:44-55.
75. Vetter IR, Arndt A, Kutay U, Gorlich D, Wittinghofer A. Structural view of the Ran-Importin beta interaction at 2.3 A resolution. Cell 1999;97:635-646.
76. Bayliss R, Littlewood T, Stewart M. Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-β in nuclear trafficking. Cell 2000;102:99-108.
77. Kent HM, Moore MS, Quimby BB, Baker AM, McCoy AJ, Murphy GA, Corbett AH, Stewart M. Engineered mutants in the switch II loop of Ran define the contribution made by key residues to the interaction with nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) and the role of this interaction in nuclear protein import. J Mol Biol 1999;289:565-577.
78. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The protein data bank: a computerbased archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
79. Case D, Pearlman DA, Caldwell JW, Cheatham TE, III, Ross WS, Simmerling CL, Darden TA, Merz KM, Stanton RV, Cheng AL, Vincent JJ, Crowley M, Tsui V, Radmer RJ, Duan Y, Pitera J, Massova I, Seibel GL, Singh UC, Weiner PK, Kollman PA. Amber 8. University of California, San Francisco, 2003.
80. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 1977;23:327-341.
81. Humphrey W, Dahlke A, Schulten K. VMD - visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:33-38.
82. Petrone P, Pande VS. Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes? Biophys J 2006;90:1583-1593.
83. Bahar I, Rader EJ. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:586-592.