Measuring source memory

Journal of Psychology

Volumn 215, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 52-60

  Bröder, Arndt ^a   Meiser, Thorsten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multinomial processing tree models; Signal detection theory; Source monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548263184     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.215.1.52     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Banks, W.P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes, Psychological Science, 11, 267-273.
2. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
3. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 57-86.
4. Batchelder, W.H., Riefer, D.M., & Hu, X. (1994). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring: Reply to Kinchla. Psychological Review, 101, 172-176.
5. Bayen, U.J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
6. Bayen, U.J., Nakamura, G.V., Dupuis, S.E., & Yang, C.L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory and Cognition, 28, 480-500.
7. Bröder, A., Noethen, D., Schütz, J., & Bay, P. (in press). Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: no evidence for implicit processes. Psychological Research.
8. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M.C., & Martensen, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process dissociation procedure. Memory and Cognition, 25, 508-517.
9. DeCarlo, L.T. (2003). Source monitoring and multivariate signal detection theory, with a model for selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 292-303.
10. Dodson, C.S., Holland, P.W., & Shimamura, A.P. (1998). On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1121-1136.
11. Dodson, C.S., & Shimamura, A.P. (2000). Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1023-1044.
12. Erdfelder, E., & Bredenkamp, J. (1998). Recognition of script-typical versus script-atypical information: Effects of cognitive elaboration. Memory and Cognition, 26, 922-938.
13. Erdfelder, E. & Buchner, A. (1998). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-97.
14. Frick, A. (2001). Erinnerung an Szenen: Gibt es einen Atypikalitätseffekt im Quellengedächtnis? [Remembering scenes: Is there a typicality effect in source memory?]. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Bonn, Germany.
15. Glanzer, M., Hilford, A., & Kim, K. (2004). Six regularities of source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1176-1195.
16. Glisky, E.L., Rubin, S.R., & Davidson, P.S.R. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1131-1146.
17. Hoffman, H.G. (1997). Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: Evidence form source attribution biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 371-383.
18. Hu, X. (1999). Multinomial processing tree models: An implementation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 689-695.
19. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W.H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
20. Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
21. Johnson, M.K., & Raye, C.L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
22. Klauer, K.C., & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the "Who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
23. Klauer, K.C., Wegener, I. & Ehrenberg, K. (2002). Perceiving minority members as individuals: The effects of relative group size in social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 223-245.
24. Malmberg, K.J. (2002). On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 380-387.
25. Mather, M., Johnson, M.K., & De Leonardis, D.M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458.
26. Meiser, T. (2005). A hierarchy of multinomial models for multidimensional source monitoring. Methodology, 1, 2-17.
27. Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
28. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: The role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 599-614.
29. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Illusory and spurious correlations: Distinct phenomena or joint outcomes of exemplar-based category learning? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 315-336.
30. Meiser, T., & Sattler, C. (2007). Boundaries of the relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 189-210.
31. Meiser, T., Sattler, C., & von Hecker, U. (2007). Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgments: The role of perceived differences in item recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1015-1040.
32. Multhaup, K.S., & Balota, D.A. (1997). Generation effects and source memory in healthy older adults and in adults with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 11, 382-391.
33. Murnane, K., & Bayen, U.J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory and Cognition, 24, 417-428.
34. Riefer, D.M., & Batchelder, W.H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
35. Riefer, D.M., Hu, X., & Batchelder, W.H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 680-693.
36. Rothkegel, R. (1999). AppleTree: A multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 696-700.
37. Shimamura, A.P., & Squire, L.R. (1987). A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 464-473.
38. Slotnick, S.D., & Dodson, C.S. (2005). Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Memory and Cognition, 33, 151-170.
39. Slotnick, S.D., Klein, S.A., Dodson, C.S., & Shimamura, A.P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
40. Snodgrass, J.G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
41. Spencer, W.D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 70, 527-539.
42. Stahl, C. (2006). Multinomiale Verarbeitungsbaummodelle in der Sozialpsychologie [Multinomial processing tree models in social psychology]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 161-171.
43. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K.C. (in press). HMMTree: A computer program for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers.
44. Starns, J.J., & Hicks, J.L. (2005). Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1213-1220.
45. Steffens, M.C., Buchner, A., Martensen, H., & Erdfelder, E. (2000). Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1152-1164.
46. Swets, J.A. (1986). Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 181-198.
47. Vogt, V., & Broder, A. (2007). Independent retrieval of source dimensions: An extension of results by Starns and Hicks (2005) and a comment on the ACSIM measure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 443-450.
48. Wegener, I., & Klauer, K.C. (2005). Social categorization without fit: The effect of gender categories on the encoding of nonsense syllables. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 36, 91-101.
49. Yonelinas, A.P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.
50. Yu, J., & Bellezza, F.S. (2000). Process dissociation as source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1518-1533.