On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1121-1136

  Dodson, Chad S ^a   Holland, Paul W ^a   Shimamura, Arthur P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; VOICE;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; SEX FACTORS; VOICE;

EID: 0032159590     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1121     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (pp. 242-293). San Francisco: Freeman.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection. Psychological Review, 89, 708-729.
3. Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 518-540.
4. Batchelder, W. H., Hu, X., & Riefer, D. M. (1994). Analysis of a model for source monitoring. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 51-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
6. Batchelder, W. H., Riefer, D. M., & Hu, X. (1994). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring: Reply to Kinchla. Psychological Review, 101, 172-176.
7. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
8. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
10. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
11. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1993). The rate of false source attributions depends on how questions are asked. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 541-557.
12. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process dissociation approach to recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
13. Dodson, C. S., Prinzmetal, W., & Shimamura, A. P. (in press). Using Excel to estimate parameters from observed data: An example from source memory data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.
14. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275-277.
15. Ferguson, S. A., Hashtroudi, S., & Johnson, M. K. (1992). Age differences in using source-relevant cues. Psychology and Aging, 3, 443-452.
16. Finke, R. A., Johnson, M. K., & Shyi, G. C. (1988). Memory confusions for real and imagined completions of symmetrical visual patterns. Memory & Cognition, 16, 133-137.
17. Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 259-279.
18. Haist, F., Joyce, C. A., & Kutas, M. (1995, March). Differences in brain activity during word stem completion priming after study under full versus divided attention. Poster presented at the second annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
19. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
20. Homa, D., & Viera, C. (1988). Long-term memory for pictures under conditions of thematically related foils. Memory & Cognition, 76, 411-421.
21. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Prohaska, V. (1992). Memory for day of the week: A 5 + 2 day cycle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 313-325.
22. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). Aprocess dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
23. Janowsky, J. S., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1989). Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1043-1056.
24. Johnson, M. K. (1992). MEM: Mechanisms of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 268-280.
25. Johnson, M. K. (1997). Identifying the origin of mental experience. In M. S. Myslobodsky (Ed.), Mythomanias (pp. 133-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Johnson, M. K., De Leonardis, D. M., Hashtroudi, S., & Ferguson, S. A. (1995). Aging and single versus multiple cues in source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 10, 507-517.
27. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., & Leach, K. (1988). The consequences for memory of imagining in another person's voice. Memory & Cognition, 16, 337-342.
28. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
29. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
30. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
31. Lindsay, D. S., Johnson, M. K., & Kwon, P. (1991). Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297-318.
32. Luria, A. R. (1968). The mind of a mnemonist. New York: Basic Books.
33. Mac-a-Mug [Computer software]. (1987). Milwaukee, WI: Shaherazam.
34. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
35. Moscovitch, M. (1994). Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology, 8, 524-534.
36. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
37. Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur. Psychology & Aging, 10, 492-497.
38. Nairne, J. S. (1991). Positional uncertainty in long-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 19, 332-340.
39. Neisser, U. (1981). John Dean's memory: A case study. Cognition, 9, 1-22.
40. Nelson, D. L., Brooks, D. H., & Wheeler, J. W. (1975). Sensory and meaning features in stimulus recognition and associative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 711-719.
41. Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., & Taylor, T. H. (1980). Is there something special about memory for internally generated information? Memory & Cognition, 8, 141-148.
42. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
43. Riefer, D. M., Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 680-693.
44. Runquist, W. N. (1978). Physical similarity and stimulus recognition: Interference could still be associative. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 32-36.
45. Schmidt, S. R. (1985). Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 11, 565-578.
46. Shimamura, A. P., Dodson, C. S., & Prinzmetal, W. (1997). Integrating the process dissociation approach with source recollection models: A theoretical analysis of multinomial models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47. Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1991). The relationship between fact and source memory: Findings from amnesic patients and normal subjects. Psychobiology, 19, 1-10.
48. Slotnick, S. D., Klein S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). An analysis of multinomial and signal detection models of source memory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
49. SoundEdit [Computer software]. (1992). San Francisco: Macromedia.
50. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 131-141.
52. Zechmeister, E. B., & McKillip, J. (1972). Recall of place on the page. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 446-453.