Independent retrieval of source dimensions: An extension of results by Starns and Hicks (2005) and a comment on the ACSIM measure

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 443-450

  Vogt, Vera ^a   Bröder, Arndt ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Average conditional source identification measure; Encoding specificity; Measurement; Multinomial modeling; Response bias: ACSIM; Retrieval; Source memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; WRITING;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERBAL LEARNING; WRITING;

EID: 33947547205     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.443     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Banks, W. P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychological Science, 11, 267-273.
2. Baschek, I.-L., Bredenkamp, J., Oehrle, B., & Wippich, W. (1977). Bestimmung der Bildhaftigkeit, Konkretheit und der Bedeutungshaltigkeit von 800 Substantiven [Determination of imagery, concreteness, and meaningfulness of 800 nouns]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 24, 353-396.
3. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
4. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
5. Bröder, A., Noethen, D., Schütz, J., & Bay, P. (in press). Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: No evidence for implicit processes. Psychological Research.
6. Buchner, A., Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1997). G Power: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for the Macintosh (Version 2.1.2) [Computer software]. Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1023-1044.
9. Flexser, A. J., & Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 85, 153-171.
10. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1993). Recognizing and remembering. In A. Collins, S. Gathercole, M. Conway, & P. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 163-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure: The experimental psychology series. New York: Erlbaum.
12. Hintzman, D. L., Block, R. A., & Inskeep, N. R. (1972). Memory for mode of input. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 741-749.
13. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
14. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
15. Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multinomial source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
16. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Illusory and spurious correlations: Distinct phenomena or joint outcomes of exemplar-based category learning? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 315-336.
17. Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428.
18. Offe, H., Anneken, G., & Kessler, E. (1981). Normen für die Konkretheits- und Vorstellbarkeitseinschätzungen von 234 Substantiven [Norms of the concreteness and imagery ratings of 234 nouns]. Psychologische Beiträge, 23, 65-85.
19. Palmeri, T. J., Goldinger, S. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 309-328.
20. Rothkegel, R. (1999). AppleTree: A multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 696-700.
21. Senkfor, A. J., & Van Petten, C. (1998). Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1005-1025.
22. Sherman, J. W., & Bessenoff, G. R. (1999). Stereotypes as source-monitoring cues: On the interaction between episodic and semantic memory. Psychological Science, 10, 106-110.
23. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
24. Starns, J. J., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1213-1220.
25. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.