Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: No evidence for implicit processes

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 524-538

  Bröder, Arndt ^a,b   Noethen, Daniela ^a   Schütz, Julia ^a,c   Bay, Patrick ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^d Sprungbrett EV Educational Counseling in Bonn   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY;

ADULT; COGNITION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MEMORY; SPACE PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 34547820355     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0047-5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Banks, W. P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychological Science, 11, 267-273
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564
3. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215
4. Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C. L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory and Cognition, 28, 480-500
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum
6. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2003). Halo and devil effects demonstrate valence-based influences on source-monitoring decisions. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 257-278
7. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1999). GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 1-11
8. Erdfelder E., Faul F., Buchner A. (2005). Power analysis for categorical methods. In: Everitt B., Howell D. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. London: Wiley, pp 1565-1570
9. Hager W., Hasselhorn M. (eds.) (1994). Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen. [Handbook of German word norms]. Göttingen: Hogrefe
10. Hendrickx, H., DeHouwer, J., Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., & VanAvermaet, E. (1997a). Hidden covariation detection might be very hidden indeed. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 23, 201-220
11. Hendrickx, H., DeHouwer, J., Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., & VanAvermaet, E. (1997b). The hide-and-seek of hidden covariation detection: Reply to Lewicki, Hill, and Czyzewska (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 23, 229-231
12. Hicks, J. L., & Cockman, D. W. (2003). The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 489-501
13. Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., Kim, K., & DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 494-510
14. Hoffman, J., & Sebald, A. (2005). When obvious covariations are not even learned implicity. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(4), 449-480
15. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47
16. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional use of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541
17. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85
18. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28
19. Lewicki, P. (1986). Processing information about covariations that cannot be articulated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 135-146
20. Lewicki, P., Czyzewska, M., & Hoffman, H. (1987). Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 523-530
21. Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Sasaki, I. (1989). Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 323-337
22. Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of information. American Psychologist, 47, 796-801
23. Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1997). Hidden covariation detection: A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 221-228
24. Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458
25. Mather, M., Shafir, E., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Misremembrance of options past: source monitoring and choice. Psychological Science, 11, 132-138
26. Meiser, T. (2005). A hierarchy of multinomial models for multidimensional source monitoring. Methodology - European Journal of Research Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2-17
27. Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137
28. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Crossed categorization effects on the formation of illusory correlations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 443-466
29. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: the role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 599-614
30. Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory and Cognition, 24, 417-428
31. Roßnagel, C. S. (2001). Revealing hidden covariation detection: evidence for implicit abstraction at study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1276-1288
32. Rothkegel, R. (1999). AppleTree: a multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 696-700
33. Sherman, J. W., & Bessenoff, G. R. (1999). Stereotypes as source-monitoring cues: on the interaction between episodic and semantic memory. Psychological Science, 10, 106-110
34. Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1987). A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 464-473
35. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517
36. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50
37. Spaniol, J., & Bayen, U. J. (2002). When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 631-651
38. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539