AppleTree: A multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 696-700

  Rothkegel, Rainer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COGNITION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0033217765     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200748     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ASHBY, F. G., PRINZMETAL, W., IVRY, R., & MADDOX, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
2. BATCHELDER, W. H., & RIEFER, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
3. BAYEN, U. J., MURNANE, K., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 197-215.
4. BUCHNER, A., ERDFELDER, E., & VATERRODT-PLÜNNECKE, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
5. BUCHNER, A., STEFFENS, M., ERDFELDER, E., & ROTHKEGEL, R. (1997). A multinomial model to assess fluency and recollection in a sequence learning task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 631-663.
6. BUCHNER, A., STEFFENS, M., & ROTHKEGEL, R. (1998). On the role of fragmentary knowledge in a sequence learning task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 251-281.
7. DEMPSTER, A. P., LAIRD, N. M., & RUBIN, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, 1-38.
8. EFRON, B., & HINKLEY, D. V. (1978). Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: Observed versus expected Fisher information. Biometrika, 65, 457-487.
9. HU, X. (1999). Multinomial processing tree models: An implementation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 689-695.
10. HU, X., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
11. READ, T. R. C., & CRESSIE, N. A. C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer.
12. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
13. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1995). A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 23, 611-630.
14. SCHWEICKERT, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 168-175.