Process Dissociation as Source Monitoring

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1518-1533

  Yu, Jingchun ^a,b   Bellezza, Francis S ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DoubleClick Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSCIOUSNESS; EGO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0034328708     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1518     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.
2. Batchelder, W. H., Hu, X., & Riefer, D. M. (1994). Analyzing a model for source monitoring. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 51-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
4. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 57-86.
5. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
6. Bender, R. H., Wallsten, T. S., & Ornstein, P. A. (1996). Age differences in encoding and retrieving details of a pediatric examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 188-198.
7. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M. C., & Martensen, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process-dissociation procedure. Memory & Cognition, 25, 508-517.
8. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
9. Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (1996). Investigating fame judgments: On the generality of hypotheses, conclusions, and measurement models? Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 197-220.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
12. Draine, S. C., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: Finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 221-225.
13. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 387-414.
14. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 1-11.
15. Estes, W. K. (1976). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37-64.
16. Graf, P., & Komatsu, S. (1994). Process-dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113-129.
17. Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 259-278.
18. Hertel, P. T., & Milan, S. (1994). Depressive deficits in recognition: Dissociation of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 736-742.
19. Hu, X., & Phillips, G. A. (1999). GPT.EXE: A powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 220-234.
20. Inoue, C., & Bellezza, F. S. (1998). The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments. Memory & Cognition, 26, 299-308.
21. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-531.
22. Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 3-26.
23. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
24. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 484-495.
25. Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley, C. M. (1992). Unconscious influences on memory: Dissociations and automaticity. In D. Milner & M. Rugg (Eds.), The neuropsychology of consciousness (pp. 201-223). London: Academic Press.
26. Jacoby, L. L., & Shrout, P. E. (1997). Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 505-510.
27. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
28. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Yonelinas, A. P., & Debner, J. A. (1994). The relationship between conscious and unconscious influences: Independence or redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 216-219.
29. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
30. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
31. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
32. Lindsay, D. S., Johnson, M. K., & Kwon, P. (1991). Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297-318.
33. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
34. Murdock, B. B. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
35. Parks, T. E. (1966). Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 44-58.
36. Read, T. R. C., & Cressie, N. A. C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Reingold, E. M., & Toth, J. P. (1996). Process dissociations versus task dissociations: A controversy in progress. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 158-202). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85-158). New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
40. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1995). A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 23, 611-630.
41. Riefer, D. M., Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 680-693.
42. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1994). The problem of differing false-alarm rates for the process-dissociation procedure: Comment on Verfaellie and Treadwell (1993). Neuropsychology, 8, 284-288.
43. Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). A response to Graf and Komatsu's critique of the process dissociation procedure: When is caution necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 113-130.
45. Verfaellie, M., & Treadwell, J. R. (1993). The status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 1, 5-13.
46. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-storage model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
47. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: Effects of interference and response speed. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 516-534.
48. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996a). Noncritical recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 131-141.
49. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996b). Response bias and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-434.
50. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 622-643.
51. Winograd, E. (1968). List differentiation as a function of frequency and retention interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76 (2, Pt. 2).