Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 57-86

  Batchelder, William H ^a   Riefer, David M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033084954     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03210812     Document Type: Review

References (170)

1. AGRESTI, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. ANDERSON, J. A. (1995). An introduction to neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. ANDERSON, N. H. (1982). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
4. ANDERSON, N. H. (1990). Integration psychophysics. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 71-93). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber.
5. ASHBY, F. G. (ED.) (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. ASHBY, F. G., PRINZMETAL, W., IVRY, R., & MADDOX, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
7. BAKER, F. B. (1992). Item response theory. New York: Marcel Dekker.
8. BAMBER, D., & VAN SANTEN, J. P. H. (1985). How many parameters can a model have and still be testable? Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 443-473.
9. BATCHELDER, W. H. (1975). Individual differences and the all-or-none vs. incremental learning controversy. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 53-74.
10. BATCHELDER, W. H. (1991). Getting wise about minimum distance measures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 267-273.
11. BATCHELDER, W. H (1998). Multinomial processing, tree models and psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 10, 331-344.
12. BATCHELDER, W. H., CHOSAK-REITER, J., SHANKLE, W. R., & DICK, M. B. (1997). A multinomial modeling analysis of memory deficits in Alzheimer's and vascular dementia. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, 206-215.
13. BATCHELDER, W. H., & CROWTHER, C. S. (1997). Multinomial processing tree models of factorial categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 45-55.
14. BATCHELDER, W. H., HU, X., & RIEFER, D. M. (1994). Analysis of a model for source monitoring. In G. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 51-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. BATCHELDER, W. H., KUMBASAR, E., & BOYD, J. P. (1997). Consensus analysis of three-way social network data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 22, 29-58.
16. BATCHELDER, W. H., & RIEFER, D. M. (1980). Separation of storage and retrieval factors in free recall of clusterable pairs. Psychological Review, 87, 375-397.
17. BATCHELDER, W. H., & RIEFER, D. M. (1986). The statistical analysis of a model for storage and retrieval processes in human memory. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 39, 120-149.
18. BATCHELDER, W. H., & RIEFER, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
19. BATCHELDER, W. H., RIEFER, D. M., & HU, X. (1994). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring: Reply to Kinchla. Psychological Review, 101, 172-176.
20. BATCHELDER, W. H., & ROMNEY, A. K. (1986). The statistical analysis of a general Condorcet model for dichotomous choice situations. In B. Grofman & G. Owen (Eds.), Information pooling and group decision making (pp. 103-112). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21. BATCHELDER, W. H., & ROMNEY, A. K. (1988). Test theory without an answer key. Psychometrika, 53, 71-92.
22. BATCHELDER, W. H., & ROMNEY, A. K. (1989). New results in test theory without an answer key. In E. Roskam (Ed.), Advances in mathematical psychology: Vol. II (pp. 229-248). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. BÄUML, K.-H. (1991). Experimental analysis of storage and retrieval processes involved in retroactive inhibition: The effect of presentation mode. Acta Psychologica, 77, 103-119.
24. BÄUML, K.-H. (1996a). A Markov model for measuring storage loss and retrieval failure in retroactive inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 92, 231-250.
25. BÄUML, K.-H. (1996b). Revisiting an old issue: Retroactive interference as a function of the degree of original and interpolated learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 380-384.
26. BAYEN, U. J., & MURNANE, K. (1996). Aging and the use of perceptual and temporal information in source memory tasks. Psychology & Aging, 11, 293-303.
27. BAYEN, U. J., MURNANE, K., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 197-215.
28. BEGG, I. A., ANAS, A., & FARINACCI, S. (1992). Dissociation of processing in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458.
29. BENDER, R. H., WALLSTEN, T. S., & ORNSTEIN, P. A. (1996). Age differences in encoding and retrieving details of a pediatric examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 188-198.
30. BISHOP, Y. M. M., FIENBERG, S. E., & HOLLAND, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. BOWER, G. H. (1961). Application of a model to paired-associate learning. Psychometrika, 26, 255-280.
32. BRAINERD, C. J., REYNA, V. F., HOWE, M. L., & KINGMA, J. (1990). The development of forgetting and reminiscence. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55(3-4, Serial No. 222).
33. BROWN, V. R. (1998). Comparing parallel and sequential multinomial models of letter identification. In C. Dowling, F. Roberts, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Recent progress in mathematical psychology (pp. 253-284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. BUCHNER, A., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). On assumptions of, relations between, and evaluations of some dissociation measurement models. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 581-594.
35. BUCHNER, A., ERDFELDER, E., STEFFENS, M. C., & MARTENSEN, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process-dissociation procedure. Memory & Cognition, 25, 508-517.
36. BUCHNER, A., ERDFELDER, E., & VATERRODT-PLUNNECKE, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
37. BUCHNER, A., STEFFENS, M. C., ERDFELDER, E., & ROTHKEGEL, R. (1997). A multinomial model to assess fluency and recollection in a sequence learning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 631-663.
38. BUCHNER, A., & WIPPICH, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 197-220.
39. BUTLER, K., & CHECHILE, R. [A.] (1976). "Acid bath" effects on storage and retrieval PI. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 349-352.
40. CHANDLER, J. P. (1969). STEPIT - Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters. Behavioral Science, 14, 81-82.
41. CHECHILE, R. [A.] (1977). Storage-retrieval analysis of acoustic similarity. Memory & Cognition, 5, 535-540.
42. CHECHILE, R. A. (1987). Trace susceptibility theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 203-222.
43. CHECHILE, R. A. (1993, August). Two models for measuring fractional storage for list learning tasks. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Norman, OK.
44. CHECHILE, R. A., & BUTLER, K. (1975). Storage and retrieval changes that occur in the development and release of PI. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 430-437.
45. CHECHILE, R. A., & EHRENSBECK, K. (1983). Long-term storage losses: A dilemma for multistore models. Journal of General Psychology, 109, 15-30.
46. CHECHILE, R. A., & MEYER, D. L. (1976). A Bayesian procedure for separately estimating storage and retrieval components of forgetting. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 13, 269-295.
47. CHECHILE, R. A., & RICHMAN, C. L. (1982). The interaction of semantic memory with storage and retrieval processes. Developmental Review, 2, 237-250.
48. CHECHILE, R. A., RICHMAN, C. L., TOPINKA, C., & EHRENSBECK, K. (1981). A developmental study of the storage and retrieval of information. Child Development, 52, 251-259.
49. CHECHILE, R. A., & RODER, B. (1998). Model-based measurement of group differences: An application directed toward understanding the information-processing mechanisms of developmental dyslexia. In S. A. Soraci & W. J. McIlvane (Eds.). Perspectives on fundamental processes in intellectual functioning: Vol. 1. A survey of research approaches (pp. 91-112). Norwich, CT: JAI Press.
50. CLARK, S. E., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
51. COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. COHEN, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
53. CORBETT, A. T., & WICKELGREN, W. A. (1978). Semantic memory retrieval: Analysis by speed accuracy tradeoff functions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 1-15.
54. CROWTHER, C. S., BATCHELDER, W. H., & HU, X. (1995). A measurement-theoretic analysis of the fuzzy logic model of perception. Psychological Review, 102, 134-148.
55. CURRAN, T., & HINTZMAN, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 531-547.
56. DAPOLITO, F. J. (1967). Proactive effects with independent retrieval of competing responses. Dissertation Abstracts, 27, 2522-2523.
57. DAVID, H. A. (1988). The method of paired comparisons (2nd ed.). London: Griffin.
58. DEHN, D. M., & ENGELKAMP, J. (1997). Process dissociation procedure: Double dissociations following divided attention and speeded responding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 318-336.
59. DEHN, D. M., & ERDFELDER, E. (1998). What kind of bias is hindsight bias? Psychological Research, 61, 135-146.
60. DEMPSTER, A. P., LAIRD, N. M., & RUBIN, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39, 1-38.
61. ERDFELDER, E., & BREDENKAMP, J. (1998). Recognition of script-typical versus script-atypical information: Effects of cognitive elaboration. Memory & Cognition, 26, 922-938.
62. ERDFELDER, E., & BUCHNER, A. (1998a). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 387-414.
63. ERDFELDER, E., & BUCHNER, A. (1998b). Process dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-96.
64. ERDFELDER, E., FAUL, F., & BUCHNER, A. (1995). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
65. EVANS, J. ST. B. (1977). Toward a statistical theory of reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 621-635.
66. EVANS, J. ST. B., & LYNCH, J. S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 391-397.
67. FERGUSON, S. A., HASHTROUDI, S., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1992). Age differences using source-relevant cues. Psychology & Aging, 7, 443-452.
68. FISCHER, G. H., & MOLENAAR, I. W. (EDS.) (1995). Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
69. FLEXSER, A. J., & TULVING, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. Psychological Review. 85, 153-171.
70. GARCIA-PEREZ, M. A. (1987). A finite theory of performance in multiple-choice tests. In E. E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.), Progress in mathematical psychology I (pp. 455-464). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
71. GARCIA-PEREZ, M. A. (1989). Item sampling, guessing, partial information and decision-making in achievement testing. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.), Mathematical psychology in progress (pp. 249-265). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
72. GARCIA-PEREZ, M. A. (1990). A comparison of two models of performance in objective tests: Finite state versus continuous distributions. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 43, 73-91.
73. GARCIA-PEREZ, M. A. (1993). In defence of "none of the above." British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 46, 213-229.
74. GARCIA-PEREZ, M. A., & FRARY, R. B. (1991a). Finite state polynomic item characteristic curves. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 44, 45-73.
75. GARCIA-PEREZ, M. A., & FRARY, R. B. (1991b). Testing finite-state models of performance in objective tests using items with "none of the above" as an option. In J.-P. Doignon & J.-C. G. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 273-291). New York: Springer-Verlag.
76. GERREIN, J. R., & CHECHILE, R. A. (1977). Storage and retrieval processes of alcohol-induced amnesia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 285-294.
77. GOLDEN, R. M. (1995). Making correct statistical inferences using a wrong probability model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 3-20.
78. GONDRAN, M., MINOUX, M., & VAJDA, S. (1984). Graphs and algorithms. New York: Wiley.
79. GREEN, D. M., & BIRDSALL, T. G. (1978). Detection and recognition. Psychological Review, 85, 192-206.
80. GREENO, J. G., JAMES, C. T., DAPOLITO. F., & POLSON, P. G. (1978). Associate learning: A cognitive analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
81. GUTOWSKI, W. E., & CHECHILE, R. A. (1987). Encoding, storage, and retrieval components of associative memory deficits of mildly retarded adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 92, 85-93.
82. HAWKINS, S. A., & HASTIE, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311-327.
83. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1980). Simpson's paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 87, 398-410.
84. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1992). Mathematical constraints and the "Tulving-Wiseman Law." Psychological Review, 99, 536-542.
85. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1993). On variability, Simpson's paradox, and the relation between recognition and recall: Reply to Tulving and Flexser. Psychological Review, 100, 143-148.
86. HOWE, M. L. (1990). Development of a mathematical model of memory for clinical research applications in aging. In M. L. Howe, M. J. Stones, & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive and behavioral performance factors in atypical aging (pp. 3-36). New York: Springer-Verlag.
87. HOWE, M. L. (1991). Misleading children's story recall: Forgetting and reminiscence of the facts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 746-762.
88. HOWE, M. L. (1995). Interference effects in young children's long-term retention. Developmental Psychology, 31, 579-596.
89. HOWE, M. L., & BRAINERD, C. J. (1989). Development of children's long-term retention. Developmental Review, 9, 301-340.
90. HOWE, M. L., COURAGE, M. L., & BRYANT-BROWN, L. (1993). Reinstating preschooler's memories. Developmental Psychology, 29, 854-869.
91. HOWE, M. L., & HUNTER, M. A. (1986). Long-term memory in adulthood: An examination of the development of storage and retrieval processes at acquisition and retention. Developmental Review, 6, 334-364.
92. HOWE, M. L., KELLAND, A., BRYANT-BROWN, L., & CLARK, S. L. (1992). Measuring the development of children's amnesia and hypermnesia. In M. L. Howe, C. J. Brainerd, & V. F. Reyna (Eds.), Development of long-term retention (pp. 56-102). New York: Springer-Verlag.
93. HOWE, M. L., & O'SULLIVAN, J. T. (1997). What children's memories tell us about recalling our childhood: A review of storage and retrieval processes in the development of long-term retention. Developmental Review, 17, 148-204.
94. HOWE, M. L., & RABINOWITZ, F. M. (1996). Reasoning from memory: A lifespan inquiry into the necessity of remembering when reasoning about class inclusion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 1-42.
95. HU, X., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1994a. August). Empirical Bayes approach for GPT models. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Seattle.
96. HU, X., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1994b). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithim. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
97. HULME, C., ROODENRYS, S., SCHWEICKERT, R., BROWN, G. D., MARTIN, S., & STUART, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 5, 1217-1232.
98. HUMPHREYS, M. S., & BAIN, J. D. (1983). Recognition memory: A cue and information analysis. Memory & Cognition, 11, 583-600.
99. HUMPHREYS, M. S., & BOWYER, P. A. (1980). Sequential testing effects and the relationship between recognition and recognition failure. Memory & Cognition, 8, 271-277.
100. HUTCHINSON, T. P. (1982). Some theories of performance in multiple choice tests and their implications for variants of the task. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 35, 71-89.
101. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
102. JACOBY, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Towards a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 3-26.
103. JACOBY, L. L., TOTH, J. P., & YONELINAS, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
104. JOHNSON, M. K., KOUNIOS, J., & REEDER, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
105. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., BYRNE, R. M., & SCHAEKEN, W. (1992). Prepositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418-439.
106. JONES, G. V. (1976). A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 277-293.
107. KAIL, R., HALE, C. A., LEONARD, L. B., & NIPPOLD, M. (1984). Lexical storage and retrieval in language-impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 37-49.
108. KINCHLA, R. A. (1994). Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring. Psychological Review, 101, 166-171.
109. KLAUER, K. C., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1996). Structural analysis of subjective categorical data. Psychometrika, 61, 199-240.
110. KLAUER, K. C., & OBERAUER, K. (1995). Testing the mental model theory of propositional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 671-687.
111. KLAUER, K. C., & WEGENER, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the "Who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
112. KRAEMER, H. C., PEABODY, C. A., TINKLENBERG, J. R., & YESAVAGE, J. A. (1983). Mathematical and empirical development of a test of memory for clinical and research use. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 367-380.
113. KRAUTH, J. (1982). Formulation and experimental verification of models in propositional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 285-298.
114. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
115. LIGHT, L. L., LAVOIE, D., VALENCIA-LAVER, D., ALBERTSON OWENS, S. A., & MEAD, G. (1992). Direct and indirect measures of memory for modality in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1284-1297.
116. LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Eyewitness suggestibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 86-89.
117. LINDSAY, D. S., JOHNSON, M. K., & KWON, P. (1991). Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297-318.
118. LOFTUS, E. F., DONDERS, K., HOFFMAN, H. G., & SCHOOLER, J. W. (1989). Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held. Memory & Cognition, 17, 607-616.
119. LUCE, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
120. LUCE, R. D. (1963). A threshold theory for simple detection experiments. Psychological Review, 70, 61-79.
121. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
122. MANDLER, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
123. MARCHE, T. A., & HOWE, M. L. (1995). Preschoolers report misinformation despite accurate memory. Developmental Psychology, 31, 554-567.
124. MASSARO, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. MCCLOSKEY, M., & ZARAGOZA, M. (1985). Postevent information and memory: Reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 381-387.
126. MCLACHLAN, G. J., & KRISHNAN, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.
127. MULDER, G., SANDERS, A. F., & VAN GALEN, G. P. (EDS.) (1995). Discrete and continuous information processing [Special issue]. Acta Psychologica, 90 (1-3).
128. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1996). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1067-1087.
129. MULLIGAN, N. W., & HIRSHMAN, E. (1997). Measuring the bases or recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 280-304.
130. NILSSON, L.-G., & GARDINER, J. M. (1993). Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992. Memory & Cognition, 21, 397-410.
131. OFFIR, J. (1972). Stochastic learning models with distributions of parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 9, 404-417.
132. PAYNE, D. G., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1987). Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 145-165.
133. PIAGET, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.
134. PRINZMETAL, W., HENDERSON, D., & IVRY, R. (1995). Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: Assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1362-1375.
135. RABINOWITZ, F. M., HOWE, M. L., & LAWRENCE, J. A. (1989). Class in-clusion and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 379-409.
136. RASCH, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Paedagogiske Institute.
137. READ, T. R. C., & CRESSIE, N. A. C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
138. RIEFER, D. M. (1982). The advantages of mathematical modeling over traditional methods in the analysis of category clustering. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26, 97-123.
139. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1987. November). Further tests of a model for measuring storage and retrieval. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle.
140. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
141. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1991a). Age differences in storage and retrieval: A multinomial modeling analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 415-418.
142. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1991b). Statistical inference for multinomial processing tree models. In. J.-P. Doignon & J.-C. G. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 313-336). New York: Springer-Verlag.
143. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1995). A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 23, 611-630.
144. RIEFER, D. M., HU, X., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 680-693.
145. RIEFER, D. M., & LAMAY, M. L. (1998). Memory for common and bizarre stimuli: A storage-retrieval analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 312-317.
146. RIEFER, D. M., & ROUDER, J. N. (1992). A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. Memory & Cognition, 20, 601-611.
147. RIPS, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 38-71.
148. ROMNEY, A. K., BATCHELDER, W. H., & WELLER, S. C. (1987). Recent applications of consensus theory. American Behavior Scientist, 31, 163-177.
149. ROMNEY, A. K., WELLER, S. C., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313-338.
150. Ross, B. H., & BOWER, G. H. (1981). Comparisons of models of associative recall. Memory & Cognition, 9, 1-16.
151. Ross, S. M. (1983). Stochastic processes. New York: Wiley.
152. ROUDER, J. N., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1998). Multinomial models for measuring storage and retrieval processes in paired-associate learning. In C. Dowling, F. Roberts, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Progress in mathematical psychology (pp. 195-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
153. RUMELHART, D. E., MCCLELLAND, J. L., & THE PDP RESEARCH GROUP. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
154. SCHONFIELD, D., & ROBERTSON, B. A. (1966). Memory storage and aging. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 20, 228-236.
155. SCHWEICKERT, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 168-175.
156. SKOFF, B., & CHECHILE, R. A. (1977). Storage and retrieval processes in the serial position effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 265-268.
157. TRABASSO, T., & BOWER, G. H. (1964). Attention in learning: Theory and research. New York: Wiley.
158. TREISMAN, A. M., & SCHMIDT, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
159. TULVING, E., & PSOTKA, J. (1971). Retroactive inhibition in free recall: Inaccessibility of information available in the memory store. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 1-8.
160. TULVING, E., & WISEMAN, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 79-82.
161. WAGENAAR, W. A., & BOER, J. P. A. (1987). Misleading postevent information: Testing parameterized models of integration in memory. Acta Psychologica, 66, 291-306.
162. WAINWRIGHT, M. J., & REINGOLD, E. M. (1996). Response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: Approaches, assumptions, and evaluation. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 232-254.
163. WASON, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology I (pp. 135-151). Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
164. WAUGH, N. C., & NORMAN, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
165. WHITE, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrika, 50, 1-26.
166. WHITE, H. (1994). Estimation, inference, and specification analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
167. WICKENS, T. D. (1982). Models for behavior: Stochastic processes in psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
168. YONELINAS, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
169. YONELINAS, A. P., & JACOBY, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-434.
170. YONELINAS, A. P., REGEHR, G., JACOBY, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 821-835.