Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: The role of perceived differences in item recognition

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1015-1040

  Meiser, Thorsten ^a   Sattler, Christine ^a   Von Hecker, Ulrich ^b  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; RECOGNITION;

COGNITION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MEMORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VOCABULARY;

EID: 34547342061     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210600875215     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.
2. Banks, W. P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychological Science, 11, 267-273.
3. Baschek, I.-L., Bredenkamp, J., Oehrle, B., & Wippich, W. (1994). Bestimmung der Bildhaftigkeit, Konkretheit und der Bedeutungshaltigkeit von 800 Substantiven [Assessment of the imageability, concreteness, and meaningfulness of 800 nouns]. In W. Hager & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch deutsch-sprachiger Wortnormen (pp. 174-186). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
4. Batchelder, W. H., Hu, X., & Riefer, D. M. (1994a). Analysis of a model for source monitoring. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 51-65). New York: Springer.
5. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
6. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
7. Batchelder, W. H., Riefer, D. M., & Hu, X. (1994b). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring: Reply to Kinchla. Psychological Review, 101, 172-176.
8. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
9. Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C. L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 480-500.
10. Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1999). An alternative conceptualization to memory "strength" in reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 804-809.
11. Bröder, A., Noethen, D., Schütz, J., & Bay, P. (in press). Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: No evidence for implicit processes. Psychological Research.
12. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference. New York: Springer.
13. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2003). Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 257-278.
14. DeCarlo, L. T. (2003). An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 767-778.
15. Dodson, C. S., Holland, P. W., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). On the recollection of specific- and partialsource information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1121-1136.
16. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
17. Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1998). Subjective theories about encoding may influence recognition: Judgmental regulation in human memory. Social Cognition, 16, 78-92.
18. Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1999). Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1195-1209.
19. Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., Kim, K., & DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 494-510.
20. Hoffman, H. G. (1997). Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: Evidence from source attribution biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 371-383.
21. Hu, X. (1996). MBT: Statistical inference program for multinomial binary tree models [Computer program]. Irvine, CA: University of California at Irvine.
22. Hu, X. (1998). GPT: General processing tree models [Computer program]. Irvine, CA: University of California at Irvine.
23. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
24. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
25. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
26. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., & Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
27. Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 7-31.
28. Klauer, K. C., Wegener, I., & Ehrenberg, K. (2002). Perceiving minority members as individuals: The effects of relative group size in social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 223-245.
29. Knapp, B. R., & Batchelder, W. H. (2004). Representing parametric order constraints in multi-trial applications of multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 215-229.
30. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1137-1151.
31. Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neurophysiological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458.
32. Meiser, T. (2005). A hierarchy of multinomial models for multidimensional source monitoring. Methodology, 1, 2-17.
33. Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
34. Meiser, T., &. Hewstone, M. (2004). Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: The role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 599-614.
35. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Illusory and spurious correlations: Distinct phenomena or joint outcomes of exemplar-based category learning? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 315-336.
36. Riefer, D. M., Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 680-693.
37. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
38. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
39. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
40. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (in press). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.
41. Strack, F., & Bless, H. (1994). Memory for nonoccurrences: Metacognitive and presuppositional strategies. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 203-217.
42. Strack, F., & Förster, J. (1998). Self-reflection and recognition: The role of metacognitive knowledge in the attribution of recollective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 111-123.
43. Strack, F., Förster, J., & Werth, L. (2005). "Know thyself!" The role of idiosyncratic self-knowledge in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 628-638.
44. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
45. von Hecker, U., & Meiser, T. (2005). Defocused attention in depressed mood: Evidence from source monitoring. Emotion, 5, 456-463.
46. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis I: The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 3-13.
47. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and sourcememory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.