Six regularities of source recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1176-1195

  Glanzer, Murray ^a   Hilford, Andy ^a   Kim, Kisok ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IONA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECOGNITION; ROC CURVE;

HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VOCABULARY;

EID: 7544235258     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1176     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Allen, L. R., & Garton, R. F. (1968). The influence of word-knowledge on the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Psychonomic Science, 10, 401-402.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Milson, R. (1989). Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96, 703-719.
3. Ashby, F. G. (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Balota, D. A., & Neely, J. H. (1980). Test expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 576-587.
5. Banks, W. P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychological Science, 11, 267-273.
6. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
7. Bornstein, B. H., & LeCompte, D. C. (1995). A comparison of item and source forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 254-259.
8. Bewles, N. L., & Glanzer, M. (1983). An analysis of interference in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 11, 307-315.
9. Clark. E. O. (1980). Semantic and episodic memory impairment in normal and cognitively impaired elderly adults. In L. K. Obler & M. L. Albert (Eds.), Language and communication in the elderly (pp. 47-57). D. C. Health, Lexington, MA.
10. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
11. DeCarlo. L. T. (2002). Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 109, 710-721.
12. DeCarlo, L. T. (2003). Source monitoring and multivariate signal detection theory, with a model for selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 292-303.
13. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478.
14. Dodson, C. S., Holland, P. W., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). On the recollection of specific and partial-source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1121-1136.
15. Dodsoo, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1023-1044.
16. Dorfrnan, D., Glanzer, M., & Kaufman, J. (1986). Aging effects on recognition memory when encoding and strategy are controlled. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 172-174.
17. Duncan, M. (1999). The dimensionality of memory strength between levels of both serial position and word frequency category. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 454-459.
18. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Rep. No. AFCRC-TN-58-51). Bloomington: Indiana University Hearing and Communication Laboratory.
19. Erber, J. T. (1974). Age differences in recognition memory. Journal of Gerontology, 29, 177-181.
20. Erber, J. T. (1978). Age differences in a controlled-lag recognition memory task. Experimental Aging Research, 4, 195-205.
21. Ferguson, S. A., Hashtroudi, S., & Johnson, M. K. (1992). Age differences in using source-relevant cues. Psychology and Aging, 7, 443-452.
22. Carton, R. F., & Allen, L. R. (1968). Familiarity and word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 385-389.
23. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
24. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
25. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16.
26. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
27. Glanzer, M., & Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 21-31.
28. Glanzer, M., Hilford, A., Kim, K., & Adams, J. K. (1999). Further tests of dual-process theory: A reply to Yonelinas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 522-523.
29. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., & Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 500-513.
30. Glisky, E. L., Polster, M. R., & Routhieaux, B. C. (1995). Double dissociation between item and source memory. Neuropsychology, 9, 229-235.
31. Gordon, S. K., & Clark, W. C. (1974). Adult age differences in word and nonsense syllable recognition memory and response criterion. Journal of Gerontology, 29, 659-665.
32. Gorman, A. M. (1961). Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 61, 23-29.
33. Green, D. M., & Swets, I. A. (1974). Signal detection and psychophysics. New York: Krieger.
34. Gregg, V. H. (1976). Word frequency, recognition and recall In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 183-216). London: Wiley.
35. Gronlund, S. D., & Elam, L. E. (1994). List-length effect Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1355-1369.
36. Harkins, S. W., Chapman, C. R., & Eisdorfer, C. (1979). Memory loss and response bias in senescence. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 66-72.
37. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106-112.
38. Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1210-1230.
39. Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., & DeLeonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 251-268.
40. Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., & Kim, K. (1997). Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Symmetry in motion. Memory & Cognition, 25, 593-605.
41. Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., Kim, K., & DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 494-510.
42. Hirshman, E., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 484-494.
43. Johnson, M. K., DeLeonardis, D. M., Hashtroudi, S., & Ferguson, S. A. (1995). Aging and single versus multiple cues in source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 10, 507-517.
44. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
45. Johnson. M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
46. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
47. Jurica, P. J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1999). Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in soorce memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 648-656.
48. Kausler, D. H., & Kleim, D. M. (1978). Age differences in processing relevant versus irrelevant stimuli in multiple-item recognition learning. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 87-93.
49. Kim, K., & Glanzer, M. (1993). Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 638-652.
50. Kinsbourne, M., & George, J. (1974). The mechanism of the word-frequency effect on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 63-69.
51. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
52. Lawrence, D. M., & Banks, W. P. (1973). Accuracy of recognition memory for common sounds. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 298-300.
53. Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1991). Recognition memory and source monitoring. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 203-205.
54. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760.
55. McCormack, P. D., & Swenson, A. L (1972). Recognition memory for common and rare words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 72-77.
56. Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
57. Multhaup, K. S., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Generation effects and source memory in healthy older adults and in adults with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 11, 382-391.
58. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1965). Signal-detection theory and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 443-447.
59. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
60. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
61. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76, (1, Pt. 2).
62. Qin, J., Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., & Mitchell, K. J. (2001). Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1110-1115.
63. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 763-785.
64. Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83, 190-214.
65. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
66. Schacter, D. L, Kaszniak, A. W., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Valdiserri, M. (1991). The relation between source memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 6, 559-568.
67. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM - retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
68. Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1987). A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 464-473.
69. Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1991). The relationship between fact and source memory: Findings from amnesic patients and a normal subject. Psychobiology, 19, 1-10.
70. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
71. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
72. Strong, E. K., Jr. (1912). The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychological Review, 19, 447-462.
73. Tanner, W. P., Jr. (1956). Theory of recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 882-888.
74. Thomas, J. P. (1985). Detection and identification: how are they related? Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2, 1457-1467.
75. Troyer, A. K., Winocur, G., Craik, F. I. M., & Moscovitch, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks. Neuropsychology, 13, 467-474.
76. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
77. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 14151434.