Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: Evidence from source attribution biases

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 371-383

  Hoffman, Hunter G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; DECISION MAKING; DEJA VU; EGO; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; LEARNING; MALE; RECALL;

ADULT; AWARENESS; DECISION MAKING; DEJA VU; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; REALITY TESTING; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0031084815     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.371     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(Pt. 2, 1-46).
2. Brown, J. (1976). An analysis of recognition and recall and of problems in their comparisons. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 1-35). New York: Wiley.
3. Brown, J., Lewis, V. J., & Monk, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency, and negative recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 461-473.
4. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
5. Foley, M. A., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech. Child Development, 54, 51-60.
6. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
7. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Theory and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16.
8. Glanzer, M., & Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 21-31.
9. Greene, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 687-695.
10. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106-112.
11. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1990). Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Psychology and Aging, 5, 119-126.
12. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
13. Hintzman, D. L. (1994). On explaining the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 201-205.
14. Hirst, W. (1982). The amnesic syndrome: Descriptions and explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 435-460.
15. Hoffman, H. G. (1992, November). The influence of study context (verbal vs. pictorial) on source attribution biases [Abstract]. Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society, St. Louis, MO.
16. Hoffman, H. G., Hullfish, K. C., & Houston, S. J. (1995). Virtual-reality monitoring. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Association International Symposium '95 (pp. 48-54). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
17. Hoffman, H. G., Prothero, J., & Wells, M. (1996). Separating memories of real and virtual chess positions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667.
19. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
20. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-338.
21. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). The illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
22. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover.
23. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371-376.
24. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
25. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
26. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., & Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
27. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, M. A., & Kim, J. K. (1982). Pictures and images: Spatial and temporal information compared. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 23-26.
28. Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1990). The construction of subjective experience: Memory attributions. Mind and Language, 5, 49-68.
29. Kelley, C. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Hollingshead, A. (1989). Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: Judgments of modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1101-1108.
30. Kisok, K., & Glanzer, M. (1994). Attention/likelihood theory: Reply to Hintzman (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 206-208.
31. Lindsay, D. S. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1077-1083.
32. Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349-358.
33. Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 100-104.
34. Marsh, R. L., & Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 673-688.
35. Marsh, R. L., & Landau, J. D. (1995). Item availability in cryptomnesia: Assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagerism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1568-1582.
36. McIntyre, J. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1987). Age differences in memory for item and source information. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 175-192.
37. Schacter, D. L., Harbluck, J. L., & McLachlan, D. R. (1984). Retrieval without recollection: An experimental analysis of source amnesia. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 593-611.
38. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
39. Suengas, A. G., & Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 377-389.
40. Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 681-690.
41. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1341-1354.