Correlated mutations contain information about protein - protein interaction

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 271, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 511-523

  Pazos, Florencio ^a   Helmer Citterich, Manuela ^b   Ausiello, Gabriele ^b   Valencia, Alfonso ^a  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Co adaptation; Correlated mutations; Docking; Hsc70; Protein contacts

Indexed keywords

HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HEMOGLOBIN; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC PROCEDURES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0030821675     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1198     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Altschuh D., Lesk A. M., Bloomer A. C., Klug A. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Mol. Biol. 193:1987;693-707.
2. Altschuh D., Vernet T., Berti P., Moras D., Nagai K. Coordinated amino acid changes in homologous protein families. Protein Eng. 2:1988;193-199.
3. Argos P. An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces. Protein Eng. 2:1988;101-113.
4. Ausiello G., Cesareni G., Helmer-Citterich M. ESCHER: a new docking procedure applied to the reconstruction of protein tertiary structure. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. In the press:1997.
5. Babu Y. S., Bugg C. E., Cook W. J. Structure of calmodulin refined at 2.2 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 204:1988;191-204.
6. Bennett M. J., Schlunegger M. P., Eisenberg D. 3D domain swapping: a mechanism for oligomer assembly. Protein Sci. 4:1995;2455-2468.
7. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J. B., Meyer E. F., Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:1977;535-542.
8. Chappel T. G., Konforti B. B., Schmid S. L., Rothman J. E. The ATPase core of a clathrin uncoating protein. J. Biol. Chem. 262:1987;746-751.
9. Cherfils J., Duquerroy S., Janin J. Protein-protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 11:1991;271-280.
10. Fischer D., Lin S. L., Wolfson H. L., Nussinov R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol. 248:1995;459-477.
11. Flaherty K. M., DeLuca-Flaherty C., McKay D. B. Three-dimensional structure of the ATPase fragment of a 70 K heat shock cognate protein. Nature. 346:1990;623-628.
12. Fletterick R. F., Bazan J. F. When one and one are not two. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;721-723.
13. Göbel U., Sander C., Schneider R., Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18:1994;309-317.
14. Gragerov A., Zeng L., Zhao X., Burkholder W., Gottesman M. E. Specificity of DnaK-peptide binding. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;848-854.
15. Gregoret L. M., Sauer R. T. Additivity of mutant effects assessed by binomial mutagenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90:1993;4246-4250.
16. Helmer-Citterich M., Tramontano A. PUZZLE: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;1021-1031.
17. Holm L., Sander C. Parser for protein folding units. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19:1994;256-268.
18. Ikura M., Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M., Zhu G., Klee C. B. Solution structure of a calmodulin-target peptide complex by multidimensional NMR. Science. 256:1992;632-638.
19. Jackson R. M., Sternberg M. J. E. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. J. Mol. Biol. 250:1995;258-275.
20. Janin J., Chothia C. The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Biol. Chem. 265:1990;16027-16030.
21. Janin J., Miller S., Chothia C. Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 204:1988;155-164.
22. Jayaraman V., Rodgers K. R., Mukerji I., Spiro T. G. Hemoglobin allostery: resonance raman spectroscopy of kinetic intermediates. Science. 269:1995;1843-1848.
23. Jiang F., Kim S. H. "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. J. Mol. Biol. 219:1991;79-102.
24. Jones S., Thornton J. M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93:1996;13-20.
25. Kavanaugh J. S., Rogers P. H., Case D. A., Arnone A. High-resolution X-Ray study of deoxyhemoglobin Rothschild 37 beta TRP→ARG : a mutation that creates an intersubunit chloride-binding site. Biochemistry. 31:1992;4111-4121.
26. Kamphuis I. G., Kalk K. H., Swarte M. B. A., Drenth J. Structure of papain refined at 1.65 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 179:1984;233-256.
27. Katchalski-Katzir E., Shariv I., Eisenstein M., Friesen A., Aflalo C., Vakser I. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;2195-2199.
28. Lengauer T., Rarey M. Methods for predicting molecular complexes involving proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:1996;402-406.
29. Lesk A. M., Chothia C. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J. Mol. Biol. 136:1980;225-270.
30. McCarty J. S., Buchberger A., Reinstein J., Bukau B. The role of ATP in the functional cycle of the DnaK chaperone system. J. Mol. Biol. 249:1995;126-137.
31. McLachlan A. D. Test for comparing related amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 61:1971;409-424.
32. Montgomery D., Jordan R., McMacken R., Freire E. Thermodinamic and structural analysis of the folding/unfolding transitions of the Escherichia coli molecular chaperone DnaK. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;680-692.
33. Morshauser R. C., Wang H., Flynn G. C., Zuiderweg E. R. P. The peptide-binding domain of the chaperone protein Hsc70 has an unusual secondary structure topology. Biochemistry. 34:1995;6261-6266.
34. Neher E. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91:1994;98-102.
35. O'Donoghue S., King G., Nilges M. Calculation of symmetric multimer structures from NMR data using a priori knowledge of the monomer structure, co-monomer restraints, and interface mapping: the case of leucine zippers. J. Biomol. NMR, 8:1996;193-206.
36. Pazos F., Olmea O., Valencia A. A graphical interface for correlated mutations and other structure prediction methods. CABIOS. 13:1997;319-321.
37. Perutz M. F. Hemoglobin structure and respiratory transport. Sci. Am. 239(6):1978;92-125.
38. Rao S. T., Wu S., Satyshur K. A., Ling K. Y., Kung C., Sundaralingam M. Structure of Paramecium tetraurelia calmodulin at 1.8 Å resolution. Protein Sci. 2:1993;436-447.
39. Sander C., Schneider R. The HSSP data base of protein structure-sequence alignments. Nucl. Acids Res. 21:1993;3105-3109.
40. Serrano L., Horovitz A., Avron B., Bycroft M., Fersht A. R. Estimating the contribution of engineered surface electrostatic interactions to protein stability using double mutant cycles. Biochemistry. 29:1990;9343-9352.
41. Shindyalov I. N., Kolchanov N. A., Sander C. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations. Protein Eng. 7:1994;349-358.
42. Shoichet B. K., Kuntz J. I. D. Protein docking and complementarity. Mol. Biol. 221:1991;327-346.
43. Siddiqui A., Barton J. Continuous and discontinuous domains: an algorithm for the automatic generation of reliable protein domain definitions. Protein Sci. 4:1995;872-884.
44. Sowdhamini R., Blundell T. An automatic method involving cluster analysis of secondary structures for the identification of domains in proteins. Protein Sci. 4:1994;506-520.
45. Stoddard B. L., Koshland D. E. Prediction of the structure of a receptor-protein complex usong a binary docking method. Nature. 358:1992;774-776.
46. Strynadka N. C., Eisenstein M., Katchalski-Katzir E., Shoichet B. K., Kuntz I. D., Abagyan R., Totrov M., Janin J., et al. Molecular docking programs succesfully predict the binding of a β-lactamase inhibitor protein to TEM-1 β-lactamase. Nature Struct. Biol. 3:1996;233-239.
47. Swindells M. B. A procedure for detecting structural domains in proteins. Protein Sci. 4:1994;103-112.
48. Taylor W. R., Hatrick K. Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 7:1994;341-348.
49. Totrov M. M., Abagyan R. A. Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:1994;259-263.
50. Tsai C. J., Lin S. L., Wolfson H. J., Nussinov R. Protein-protein interfaces: architectures and interactions in protein-protein interfaces and in protein cores. Their similarities and differences. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31:1996;127-152.
51. Vernet T., Tessier D. C., Khouri H. E. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid changes at the two-domain interface of cysteine proteases with protein stability. J. Mol. Biol. 224:1992;501-509.
52. Walls P. H., Sternberg M. J. New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. Applications to antibody-antigen docking. J. Mol. Biol. 228:1992;277-297.
53. Young L., Jernigan R. L., Covell D. G. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci. 3:1994;717-729.
54. Zhu X., Zhao X., Burkholder W. F., Gragerov A., Ogata C. M., Gottesman M. E., Hendrickson W. A. Structural analysis of sustrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science. 272:1996;1606-1614.