Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at U.S. companies

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 267-288

  Westphal, James D ^a   Stern, Ithai ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248578227     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634434     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17-40.
2. Allport, G. W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Aquino, K., & Bommer, W. H. 2003. Preferential mistreatment: How victim status moderates the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and workplace victimization. Organization Science, 14: 374-385.
4. Beal, D. J., Ruscher, J. B., & Schnake, S. B. 2001. No benefit of the doubt: Intergroup bias in understanding causal attribution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40: 531-543.
5. Bettencourt, B. A., Brewer, M. B., Croak, M. R., & Miller, N. 1992. Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias: The role of reward structure and social orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28: 301-319.
6. Bilimoria, D., & Piderit, S. K. 1994. Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1453-78.
7. Brewer, M. B. 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 307-324.
8. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. 1985. The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 36: 219-243. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
9. Broad, D. B. 1996. The social register: Directory of America's upper class. Sociological Spectrum, 16: 173-181.
10. Burris, V. 2001. The two faces of capitalism: Corporations and individual capitalists as political actors. American Sociological Review, 66: 361-381.
11. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Byrne, D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
13. Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. 2001 The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 639-650.
14. Certo, S. T. 2003. Influencing IPO investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28: 432-446.
15. Chatman, C. M., & von Hippel, W. 2001. Attributional mediation of in-group bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37: 267-272.
16. Chatterjee, S., & Harrison, J. S. 2001. Corporate governance. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 543-563. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
17. Conyon, M., & Peck, S. 1998, Board control, remuneration committees and top management compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 146-157.
18. Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. 2003. A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129: 414-446.
19. Davis, G. F. 1993. Who gets ahead in the market for corporate directors: The political economy of multiple board memberships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
20. Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. 1994. A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 141-173.
21. DeCremer, D. 2001. Relations of self-esteem concerns, group identification, and self-stereotyping to ingroup favoritism. Journal of Social Psychology, 141: 389-401.
22. Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. 1992. The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
23. Deutsch, Y., & Ross, T. W. 2003. You are known by the directors you keep: Reputable directors as a signaling mechanism for young firms. Management Science, 49: 1003-1017.
24. DeVellis, R. F. 1991. Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Domhoff, G. W. 1970. The higher circles: The governing class in America. New York: Vintage.
26. Domhoff, G. W. 2002. Who rules America? Power and politics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. 2000. Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11: 315-319.
28. Ellis, A., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. 2002. The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 1200-8.
29. Evans, J., & Weir, C. 1995. Decision processes, monitoring, incentives and large firm performance in the UK. Management Decision, 33: 32-39.
30. Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 288-307.
31. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. 1983. The separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-325.
32. Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 505-538.
33. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul: West.
34. Fleiss J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
35. Fowler, F. J. 1993. Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Fox, R. J., Crask, M. R., & Kim, J. 1988. Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52: 467-491.
37. Gardham, K., & Brown, R. 2001. Two forms of intergroup discrimination with positive and negative outcomes: Explaining the positive-negative asymmetry effect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40: 23-34.
38. Gersh, D. 1987. The corporate elite and the introduction of IQ testing in American public schools, in M. Schwartz (Ed.), The structure of power in America: 163-184 New York: Holmes & Meier.
39. Godfrey, D. K., Jones, E. E., & Lord, C. C. 1986. Self-promotion is not ingratiating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 106-115.
40. Gordon, R. A. 1996. Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluation: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71: 54-68.
41. Hagendoorn, L., & Hraba, J. 1987. Social distance toward Holland's minorities: Discrimination against and among ethnic outgroups. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 10: 317-333.
42. Harrison, A. W., & Hochwarter, W. A. 1998. The ingratiation construct: An assessment of the validity of the measure of ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 932943.
43. Heckman, J. J., & Borjas, G. J. 1980. Does unemployment cause future unemployment: Definitions, questions, and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica, 47: 247-283.
44. Heider, F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
45. Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. 1998. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88: 96-118.
46. Hewstone, M. 1990. The "ultimate attribution error"? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20: 311-335.
47. Hewstone, M., Hantzi, A., & Johnston, L. 1991. Social categorization and person memory: The pervasiveness of race as an organizing principle. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21: 517-528.
48. Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. 2003. Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 89-106.
49. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. 2002. Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28: 747-763.
50. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28: 383-396.
51. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. 1993. Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64: 936-950.
52. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. 1996. Board of directors: A review and research agenda, Journal of Management, 22, 3, 409-438.
53. Jones, E. E. 1964. Ingratiation. New York: Meredith.
54. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. 1982. Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suis (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self: 231-262. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Jones, E. E., & Wortman, E. 1973. Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NY: General Learning Press.
56. Judge, T. A., & R. D. Bretz. 1994. Political influence behavior and career success. Journal of Management, 20: 43-65.
57. Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. 1992. Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 766-794.
58. Kumar, K., & Beyerlein, M. 1991. Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 619-627.
59. Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. 1988. Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 13: 572-587.
60. Lorsch, J., & Maclver, E. 1989. Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
61. Mizruchi, M. S. 2004. Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
62. Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. 1987. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55: 703-708.
63. Norton, E. G., Wang, H., & Ai, C. 2004. Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4: 103-116.
64. O'Neal, D., & Thomas, H. 1996. Developing the strategic board. Long Range Planning, 29: 314-327.
65. Orpen, C. 1996. Construct validation of a measure of ingratiatory behavior in organizational settings. Current Psychology, 15: 38-42.
66. Otten, S., & Mummendey, A. 1999. To our benefit or at your expense? Justice considerations in intergroup allocations of positive and negative resources. Social Justice Research, 12: 19-38.
67. Otten, S., & Wentura, D. 2001. Self-anchoring and ingroup favoritism: An individual profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37: 525-533.
68. Palmer, D., & Barber, B. M. 2001. Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 87-120.
69. Pettigrew, T. F. 1979. The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5: 461-476.
70. Pfeffer, J. 1991. Organization theory and structural perspectives on management. Journal of Management, 17: 789-803.
71. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
72. Phan, P. H. 2000. Taking back the boardroom: Better directing for the new millennium. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
73. Pulakos, E. D., & Wexley, K. N. 1983. The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 129-139.
74. Radbourne, J. 2003. Performing on boards: The link between governance and corporate reputation in nonprofit arts boards. Corporate Reputation Review, 6: 212-222.
75. Ratcliffe, R. 1987. The inner circle and bank landing policy. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), The structure of power in America: 154-162. New-York: Holmes & Meier.
76. Rediker, K. J., & Seth, A. 1995. Boards of directors and substation effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 85-99.
77. Rencher, A. C. 1998. Multivariate statistical inference and applications. New York: Wiley.
78. Roe, M. 1994. Strong manager, weak owner: The political roots of American corporate finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79. Sadler, P., & Woody, E. 2003. Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 80-96.
80. Seidel, M. D. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2003. Research impact: How seemingly innocuous social cues in a CEO survey can lead to change in board of director network ties. Strategic Organization, 2: 227-270.
81. Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. 1998. Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 383-393.
82. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737-784.
83. Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology: 290-312. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
84. Stevens, C. K., & Kristof, A. L. 1995. Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 587-606.
85. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1: 149-178.
86. Tedeschi, J. T., & Melburg, V. 1984. Impression management and influence in the organization. In S. B. Bacharach & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: 31-58. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
87. Tosi, H. L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1994. CEO compensation monitoring and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1002-1017.
88. Turner, J. C. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
89. Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. 2001. Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 351-360.
90. Useem, M. 1984. The inner circle. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
91. Useem, M. 1987. Corporate philanthropy. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A resource handbook: 340-359. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
92. Useem, M., & Karabel, J. 1986. Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review, 51: 184-200.
93. Verkuyten, M., Drabbles, M., & Van den Nieuwenhuijzen, K. 1999. Self-categorization and emotional reactions to ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 605-620.
94. Vonk, R. 1998. The slime effect: Suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior toward superiors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 849-864.
95. Vonk, R. 2002. Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 515-526.
96. Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15: 421-458.
97. Wayne, S. J., & Kacmar, K. M. 1991. The effects of impression management on the performance appraisal process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48: 70-88.
98. Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. 1995. Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 232-260.
99. Weber, J. G. 1994. The nature of ethnocentric attribution bias - Ingroup protection or enhancement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 482-504.
100. Westphal, J. D. 1998. Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 511-538.
101. Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEOboard social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 7-25.
102. Westphal, J. D., & Khanna, P. 2003. Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 361-398.
103. Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. 2006. The other pathway to the boardroom: How interpersonal influence behavior can substitute for elite credentials and demographic majority status in gaining access to board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 169-204.
104. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1995. Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 60-83.
105. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 20: 77-140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
106. Ybarra, O. 2002. NaÏve causal understanding of valenced behaviors and its implications for social information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 128: 421-441.
107. Yermack, D. 2004. Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. Journal of Finance, 59: 2281-2308.
108. Yukl, G., & Tracey, J. B. 1992. Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 525-535.
109. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. 1996. Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 64-90.