Defining the limits of taxonomic conservatism in host-plant use for phytophagous insects: Molecular systematics and evolution of host-plant associations in the seed-beetle genus Bruchus Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 251-269

  Kergoat, Gaël J ^a   Silvain, Jean François ^b   Delobel, Alex ^c   Tuda, Midori ^d   Anton, Klaus Werner ^e  

^a CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^d KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ancestral character state reconstruction; Bruchinae; Bruchus; Partitioned analyses; Phylogenetic inference; Phytophagous insects; Taxonomic conservatism

Indexed keywords

PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; FOOD CHAIN; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; BEETLES; DNA PRIMERS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FOOD CHAIN; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

BRUCHINAE; BRUCHUS; CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 33947728524     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.026     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Alfaro M.E., Zoller S., and Lutzoni F. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 255-266
2. Annis B., and O'Keeffe L.E. Response of two Lathyrus species to infestation by the pea weevil Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 35 (1984) 83-87
3. Anton K.-W. Results of the Czechoslovak-Iranian entomological expeditions to Iran 1970, 1973 and 1977 Coleoptera Bruchidae. Cas. Nar. Muzea Rada Prirod. 167 (1998) 73-90
4. Anton K.-W. Two new species of the Bruchus brachialis group from the Mediterranean region (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Bruchinae). Linzer Biol. Betr. 31 (1999) 655-660
5. Anton K.-W. Bemerkungen zur faunistik und taxonomie mitteleuropäischer samenkäfer (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Folia Entomol. Hungarica 62 (2001) 43-49
6. Arora G.L. Taxonomy of the Bruchidae (Coleoptera) of Northwest India. Orient. Insects Suppl. 7 (1977) 1-132
7. Asmussen C., and Liston A. Chloroplast DNA characters, phylogeny and classification of Lathyrus (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85 (1998) 962-969
8. Baker R.H., and DeSalle R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of the Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46 (1997) 645-673
9. Becerra J.X. Insects on plants: macroevolutionary chemical trends in host use. Science 276 (1997) 253-256
10. Becerra J.X., and Venable D.L. Macroevolution of insect-plant associations: the relevance of host biogeography to host affiliation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 22 (1999) 12626-12631
11. Bell E.A. Association of ninhydrin-reacting compounds in the seeds of 49 species of Lathyrus. Biochem. J. 83 (1962) 225-229
12. Bell E.A., Lackey J.A., and Polhill R.M. Systematic significance of canavanine in the Papilioinoideae (Faboideae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 6 (1978) 201-212
13. Belshaw R., and Quicke D.L.J. Robustness of ancestral character state estimates: evolution of life history strategy in ichneumonoid parasitoids. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 450-477
14. Bernays E.A. Evolution of feeding behaviour in insect herbivores. Bioscience 48 (1998) 35-44
15. Bernays E.A. Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46 (2001) 703-727
16. Bleiler J.A., and Rosenthal G.A. Biochemical ecology of canavanine-eating seed predators. Ecology 69 (1988) 427-433
17. Borowiec L. The genera of seed-beetles (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Polsk. Pismo Entomol. 57 (1987) 3-207
18. Borowiec, L., 1988. Bruchidae-Strakowce (Insecta: Coleoptera). Fauna Polski, tom 11. PWN, Warszawa.
19. Brandley M.C., Schmitz A., and Reeder T.W. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 373-390
20. Bremer K. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 (1988) 795-803
21. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10 (1994) 295-304
22. Brown E.G., and Turan Y. Pyrimidine metabolism and secondary product formation; biogenesis of albizziinen 4-hydroxyhomoarginine and 2,3-diaminopropanoic acid. Phytochemistry 40 (1995) 763-771
23. Buckley T.R., Simon C., Shimodaira H., and Chambers G.K. Evaluating hypotheses on the origin and evolution of the New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada) using multiple-comparison tests of tree topology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18 (2001) 223-234
24. Bull J.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Cunningham C.W., Swofford D.L., and Waddell P.J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 384-397
25. Clark C.G., Tague B.W., Ware V.C., and Gerbi S.A. Xenopus laevis 28S ribosomal RNA: a secondary structure model and its evolutionary and functional implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 12 (1984) 6197-6220
26. Choong-Gon K., Hong-Zhang Z., Imura Y., Tominaga O., Su Z.-H., and Osawa S. Pattern of morphological diversification in the Leptocarabus ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as deduced from mitochondrial ND5 gene and nuclear 28S rDNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol 17 (2000) 137-145
27. Cornell H.V., and Hawkins B.A. Herbivore responses to plant secondary compounds: a test of phytochemical coevolution theory. Am. Nat. 161 (2003) 507-522
28. Cunningham C.W. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 (1997) 733-740
29. Debry R.W. Improving interpretation of the decay index for DNA sequence data. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 742-752
30. Decelle J. Les Bruchidae des i{dotless}̂les Canaries. Bull. Ann. Soc. R. Entomol. Belg. 111 (1975) 109-142
31. Decelle J. Une nouvelle espèce de Bruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) des i{dotless}̂les Canaries. Vieraea 8 (1979) 143-146
32. Delobel A., and Delobel B. Les plantes-hôtes des bruches (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) de la faune de France, une analyse critique. Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon 72 (2003) 199-221
33. Delobel, A., Tran, M., 1993. Les Coléoptères des denrées alimentaires entreposées dans les régions chaudes. Faune tropicale XXXII. Orstom/CTA, Paris.
34. Delobel B., and Delobel A. Les plantes-hôtes des bruches, errata et données nouvelles. Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon 74 (2005) 277-291
35. Dobler S., and Farrell B.D. Host use evolution in Chrysochus milkweed beetles: evidence from behaviour, population genetics and phylogeny. Mol. Ecol. 8 (1999) 1297-1307
36. Doss R.P., Oliver J.E., Proebsting W.M., Potter S.W., Kuy S., Clement S.L., Williamson R.T., Carney J.R., and DeVilbiss E.D. Bruchins: insect-derived plant regulators that stimulate neoplasm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (1997) 6218-6223
37. Duckett C.N., Gillespie J.J., and Kjer K.M. Relationships among the subfamilies of Chrysomelidae inferred from small subunit ribosomal DNA and morphology, with special emphasis on the relationship among the flea beetles and the Galerucinae. In: Jolivet P., Schmitt M., and Santiago-Blay J. (Eds). New contributions in Chrysomelidae biology (2003), SPB Academic Publishing, The Netherlands 3-18
38. Ehrlich P.R., and Raven P.H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18 (1964) 586-608
39. Erixon P., Svennblad B., Britton T., and Oxelman B. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 665-673
40. Faith D.P., and Cranston P.S. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7 (1991) 1-28
41. Farrell B.D. "Inordinate fondness" explained: Why are there so many beetles?. Science 281 (1998) 555-559
42. Farrell B.D. Evolutionary assembly of the milkweed fauna: cytochrome oxidase I and the age of Tetraopes beetles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18 (2001) 467-478
43. Farrell B.D., and Mitter C. Phylogenesis of insect/plant interactions: have Phyllobrotica leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) and the Lamiales diversified in parallel?. Evolution 44 (1990) 1389-1403
44. Farrell B.D., and Sequeira A.S. Evolutionary rates in the adaptive radiation of beetles on plants. Evolution 58 (2004) 1984-2001
45. Farris J.S., Källersjö M., Kluge A.G., and Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10 (1994) 315-319
46. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 (1985) 783-791
47. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies with a molecular clock. Syst. Zool. 34 (1985) 152-161
48. Futuyma D.J., Keese M.C., and Scheffer S. Genetic constraints and the phylogeny of insect-plant associations: responses of Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to host-plants of its congeners. Evolution 47 (1993) 888-905
49. Futuyma D.J., and McCafferty S.S. Phylogeny and the evolution of host-plant associations in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Evolution 44 (1990) 1885-1913
50. Galtier N., Gouy M., and Gautier C. SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12 (1996) 543-548
51. Gillespie J., Cannone J., Gutell R., and Cognato A. A secondary structure model of the 28S rRNA expansion segments D2 and D3 from rootworms and related leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae; Galerucinae). Insect Mol. Biol. 13 (2004) 495-518
52. Goldman N., Anderson J.P., and Rodrigo A.G. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 652-670
53. Gu X., Fu Y.-X., and Li W.-H. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 (1995) 546-557
54. Harry M., Solignac M., and Lachaise D. Molecular evidence for parallel evolution of adaptive syndromes in fig-breeding Lissocephala (Drosophilidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9 (1998) 542-551
55. Hillis D.M., and Bull J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a methods for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 182-192
56. Huelsenbeck J.P., Bull J.J., and Cunningham C.W. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (1996) 152-157
57. Huelsenbeck J.P., Larget B., Miller R.E., and Ronquist F. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 673-688
58. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Ronquist F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 754-755
59. Huignard J., Baehr J.C., Desroches P., and Mandon N. Adaptation of a Callosobruchus maculatus strain to Vicia faba, as its new host-plant. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80 (1996) 156-159
60. Huignard, J., Dupont, P., Tran, B., 1990. Coevolutionary relations between bruchids and their host-plants. The influence of the physiology of the insects. In: Fuji, K, Gatehouse, A.M.R., Johnson, C.D., Mitchel, R., Yoshida, T. (Eds.), Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution: Proceedings, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 171-179.
61. Hoffmann, A., 1945. Coléoptères Bruchidae et Anthribidae. In: Lechevalier, P. (Ed.), Faune de France- 44, Paris, pp. 1-184.
62. Jaaska V. Isozyme variation and phylogenetic relationships in Vicia subgenus Cracca (Fabaceae). Ann. Bot. 96 (2005) 1085-1096
63. Janz N., and Nylin S. Butterflies and plants: a phylogenetic study. Evolution 52 (1998) 486-502
64. Janzen D.H., Juster H.B., and Bell E.A. Toxicity of secondary compounds to the seed-eating larvae of the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Phytochemistry 16 (1977) 223-227
65. Jermy T., and Szentesi A. The role of inhibitory stimuli in the choice of oviposition site by phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24 (1978) 258-271
66. Jermy T., and Szentesi A. Evolutionary aspects of host-plant specialization-a study on bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). OIKOS 101 (2003) 196-204
67. Johnson C.D. The use of host preferences as taxonomic characters of bruchid beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) feeding in the seeds of Cassia (Leguminosae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 53 (1980) 27-34
68. Johnson, C.D., 1981. Seed beetle host specificity and the systematics of the Leguminosae. In: Polhill, R.M., Raven, P.H. (Eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 995-1027.
69. Johnson, C.D., Southgate, B.J., Delobel, A., 2004. A revision of the Caryedontini (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Pachymerinae) of Africa and the Middle East. Mem. Am. Entomol. Soc. 44, 1-120.
70. Kass R.E., and Raftery A.E. Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90 (1995) 773-775
71. Kawecki T.J., and Mery F. Evolutionary conservatism of geographic variation in host preference in Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecol. Entomol. 28 (2003) 449-456
72. Kelley S.T., and Farrell B.D. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host-use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution 52 (1998) 1731-1743
73. Kenicer G.J., Kajita T., Pennington R.T., and Murata J. Systematics and biogeography of Lathyrus (Leguminosae) based on internal transcribed spacer and cpDNA sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 99 (2005) 1199-1209
74. Kergoat G.J., Alvarez N., Hossaert-McKey M., Faure N., and Silvain J.-F. Parallels in the evolution of the two largest New and Old World seed-beetle genera (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Mol. Ecol. 14 (2005) 4003-4021
75. Kergoat G.J., Delobel A., Fédière G., Le Rü B., and Silvain J.-F. Both host-plant phylogeny and chemistry have shaped the African seed-beetle radiation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 35 (2005) 602-611
76. Kergoat G.J., Delobel A., and Silvain J.-F. Phylogeny and host-specificity of European seed beetles (Coleoptera, Bruchidae), new insights from molecular and ecological data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32 (2004) 855-865
77. Kergoat G.J., and Silvain J.-F. Le genre Bruchidius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) est-il monophylétique? Apports des méthodes de parcimonie, maximum de vraisemblance et inférence bayésienne. Biosystema 22 (2004) 113-125
78. Kingsolver J.M. A new fossil bruchid genus and its relationships to modern genera (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Pachymerinae). Coleopt. Bull. 19 (1965) 25-30
79. Kingsolver J.M. On the family Bruchidae. Chrysomela Newsl. 30 (1995) 3
80. Kishino H., Miyata T., and Hasegawa M. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 30 (1990) 151-160
81. Kupicha F.K. The infrageneric structure of Lathyrus. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 41 (1983) 209-244
82. Lewis P.O. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 913-925
83. Lingafelter A., and Pakaluk J. Comments on the Bruchinae and Chrysomelidae. Chrysomela Newsl. 33 (1997) 3-4
84. Lopez-Vaamonde C., Godfray H.C.J., and Cook J.M. Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant use in a genus of leaf-mining moths. Evolution 57 (2003) 1804-1821
85. Lukjanovitch, F.K., Ter-Minasian, M.E., 1957. Zhuki-zernovski (Bruchidae). Fauna SSSR, Zhestkokrylye, 24, 209 pp. Moscow.
86. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2005. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.06 .
87. Maddison W.P., and Slatkin M. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45 (1991) 1184-1197
88. Miller R.E., Buckley T.R., and Manos P.S. An examination of the monophyly of morning glory taxa using Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 740-753
89. Monteiro A., and Pierce N.E. Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and Ef-1α gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18 (2001) 264-281
90. Mooers A.O., and Schluter D. Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum-likelihood: support for one- and two-rate models. Syst. Biol. 48 (1999) 623-633
91. Morimoto, K., 1990. A synopsis of the bruchid fauna of Japan. In: Fuji, K, Gatehouse, A.M.R., Johnson, C.D., Mitchel, R., Yoshida, T. (Eds.), Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution: Proceedings, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 131-140.
92. Morse G.E., and Farrell B.D. Ecological and evolutionary diversification of the seed beetle genus Stator (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Evolution 59 (2005) 1315-1333
93. N'Diaye S., Fabres G., and Labeyrie V. Modalités de la compétition larvaire intraspécifique chez Bruchus affinis (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) dans les graines de Lathyrus sylvestris (Leguminosae, Fabaceae). Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 97 (1992) 135-144
94. N'Diaye S., and Labeyrie V. Etude de l'adaptation de Bruchus affinis à Lathyrus sylvestris: analyse de la mortalité avant l'installation des larves dans la graine. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 55 (1990) 195-204
95. Nylander J.A.A., Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P., and Nieves-Aldrey J.L. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 47-67
96. Odegaard F., Diserud O.H., and Ostbye K. The importance of plant relatedness for host utilization among phytophagous insects. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 612-617
97. Page R.D.M. Comparative analysis of secondary structure of insect mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal RNA using maximum weighted matching. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 3839-3845
98. Page, R.D.M., 2001. TreeView. Version 1.66 .
99. Pagel M. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48 (1999) 612-622
100. Pagel, M., 2003. Multistate. available via . School of animal and microbial sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
101. Poinar Jr. G. A fossil palm bruchid, Caryobruchus dominicanus sp. n. (Pachymerini: Bruchidae) in Dominican amber. Entomol. Scand. 30 (1999) 219-224
102. Poinar Jr. G. A cretaceous palm bruchid, Mesopachymerus antiqua, n. gen., n. sp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Pachymerini) and biogeographical implications. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 107 (2005) 392-397
103. Posada D., and Crandall K.A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 (1998) 817-818
104. Ramsay G., and Griffiths D.W. Accumulation of vicine and convicine in Vicia faba and V. narbonensis. Phytochemistry 42 (1996) 63-67
105. Reid C. More on the family Bruchidae. Chrysomela Newsl. 31 (1996) 3
106. Rozan P., Kuo Y.-H., and Lambein F. Amino acids in seeds and seedlings of the genus Lens. Phytochemistry 58 (2001) 281-289
107. Scheffer S.J., and Wiegmann B.M. Molecular phylogenetics of the holly leafminers (Diptera: Agromyzidae: Phytomyza): species limits, speciation, and dietary specialization. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17 (2000) 244-255
108. Schluter D., Price T., Mooers A.O., and Ludwig D. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51 (1997) 1699-1711
109. Schmitt M. Again, bruchid classification. Chrysomela Newsl. 36 (1998) 3-4
110. Shimodaira H., and Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 1114-1116
111. Siemens D.H., Johnson C.D., and Woodman R.L. Determinants of host range in bruchid beetles. Ecology 72 (1991) 1560-1566
112. Silvain J.-F., and Delobel A. Phylogeny of west African Caryedon (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): congruence between molecular and morphological data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9 (1998) 533-541
113. Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., and Flook P. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87 (1994) 651-702
114. Smith, A.M., 1990. Pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) and crop-loss implications for management. In: Fuji, K, Gatehouse, A.M.R., Johnson, C.D., Mitchel, R., Yoshida, T. (Eds.), Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution: Proceedings, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 105-114.
115. Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Mort M.E., Chase M.W., Savolainen V., Hoot S.B., and Morton C.M. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for Angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47 (1998) 32-42
116. Sorenson M.D. TreeRot.v2. (1999), Boston University, Boston
117. Southgate B.J. Biology of the Bruchidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24 (1979) 449-473
118. Steele K.P., and Wojciechowski M.F. Phylogenetic analyses of tribes Trifolieae and Vicieae, based on sequences of the plastid gene matK (Papilionoideae: Leguminosae). In: Klitgaard K., and Bruneau A. (Eds). Advances in Legume Systematics, part 10, Higher Level Systematics (2003), The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 355-370
119. Swofford, D.L., 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
120. Szentesi A., and Jermy T. Predispersal seed predation in leguminous species: seed morphology and bruchid distribution. OIKOS 73 (1995) 23-32
121. Ter-Minasian M.E. A new species of the genus Bruchus L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) from the fauna of USSR. Rev. Entomol. URSS 47 (1968) 181-183
122. Termonia A., Pasteels J., Windosr D.M., and Milinkovitch M.C. Dual chemical sequestration: a key mechanism in transitions among ecological specialization. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 (2002) 1-6
123. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., and Higgins D.G. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25 (1997) 4876-4882
124. Thompson J.N. Preference hierarchies and the origin of geographical specialization in host use in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 47 (1993) 1585-1594
125. Tran B., Darquenne J., and Huignard J. Changes in responsiveness to factors inducing diapause termination in Bruchus rufimanus (Boh.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Insect. Physiol. 39 (1993) 769-774
126. Tran B., and Huignard J. Interactions between photoperiod and food affect the termination of reproductive diapause in Bruchus rufimanus (Boh.), (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). J. Insect. Physiol. 38 (1992) 633-637
127. Trueman J.W.H. Permutation tests and outgroups. Cladistics 12 (1996) 253-261
128. Tuda M., Chou L.-Y., Niyomdham C., Buranapanichpan S., and Tateishi Y. Ecological factors associated with pest status in Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): high host specificity of non-pests to Cajaninae (Fabaceae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 41 (2005) 31-45
129. Tuda M., Ronn J., Buranapanichpan S., Wasano N., and Arnqvist G. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): traits associated with stored-product pest status. Mol. Ecol. 15 (2006) 3541-3551
130. Verma K.K., and Saxena R. The status of Bruchidae as a family. Chrysomela Newsl. 32 (1996) 3
131. Wahlberg N. The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host-plant specialization in melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution 55 (2001) 522-537
132. Weder J.K.P., and Kahleyss R. Isolation and characterisation of four trypsin-chymotrypsin inhibitors from lentil seeds. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 78 (1998) 429-434
133. Wendt H. Bruchus ecalcaratus K. Daniel, 1906-ein Synonym zu Bruchus rufimanus Boheman, 1833 (Coleoptera, Chrysomeloidea, Bruchidae). Deutsche Entomol. Zeit. 40 (1993) 161-165
134. Wheeler W.C., Cartwright P., and Hayashi C.Y. Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach. Cladistics 9 (1993) 1-39
135. Wiens J.J. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst. Biol. 47 (1998) 568-581
136. Wiens J.J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 528-538
137. Wiens J.J. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J. Biomed. Inf. 39 (2006) 34-42
138. Yang Z. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39 (1994) 105-111
139. Yang Z. Maximum likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42 (1996) 587-596
140. Yotoko K.S.C., Prado P.I., Russo C.A.M., and Solferini V.N. Testing the trends towards specialization in herbivore-host-plant associations using a molecular phylogeny of Tomoplagia (Diptera: Tephritidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 35 (2005) 701-711
141. Zampetti M.F. Una nuova specie di Bruchus del Libano (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Fragm. Entomol. Roma 24 (1993) 215-218