Systematics and biogeography of Lathyrus (Leguminosae) based on internal transcribed spacer and cpDNA sequence data

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1199-1209

  Kenicer, Gregory J ^a,b   Kajita, Tadashi ^a,c   Pennington, R Toby ^b   Murata, Jin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bering land bridge; Biogeography; cpDNA; Extratropical distribution; Internal transcribed spacer; Lathyrus; Leguminosae; Notolathyrus

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; MEDITERRANEAN REGION; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; NORTH AMERICA; OCEANIC REGIONS; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

FABACEAE; LATHYRUS; LATHYRUS JAPONICUS; LATHYRUS PALUSTRIS; NOTOLATHYRUS; PAPILIONOIDEAE; TRANSBERINGIA;

EID: 21344439089     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.7.1199     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. AÏNOUCHE, A.-K., AND R. J. BAYER. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships in Lupinus (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. American Journal of Botany 86: 590-607.
2. ALLAN, G. J., AND J. M. PORTER. 2000. Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae) with special reference to Lotus: evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. American Journal of Botany 87: 1871-1881.
3. ALLKIN, R., T. D. MACFARLANE, R. J. WHITE, F. A. BISBY, AND M. E. ADEY. 1985. The geographical distribution of Lathyrus 1. Southampton University, Southampton, UK.
4. ASMUSSEN, C., AND A. LISTON. 1998. Chloroplast DNA characters, phylogeny and classification of Lathyrus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 387-401.
5. BADR, A., H. EL SHAZLY, H. EL RABEY, AND L. E. WATSON. 2002. Systematic relationships in Lathyrus sect. Lathyrus (Fabaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 962-969.
6. BALL, P. W. 1968. Lathyrus. In T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, and D. A. Webb [eds.], Flora Europaea, vol. II, 136-143. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. BARNEBY, R. C., AND J. L. REVEAL. 1971. A new species of Lathyrus (Fabaceae) from the Death Valley region of California and Nevada. Aliso 7: 361-364.
8. BÄSSLER, M. 1966. Die Stellung des Subgenus Orobus (L.) Baker in der Gattung Lathyrus L. und seine systematische Gliederung. Feddes Repertorium 72: 69-97.
9. BÄSSLER, M. 1971. Beitrage zur Nomenklatur der Gattung Lathyrus L. Feddes Repertorium 82: 433-439.
10. BÄSSLER, M. 1973. Revision der eurasiatischen arten von Lathyrus L. Sect. Orobus (L.) Gren. et. Godr. Feddes Repertorium 84: 329-447.
11. BÄSSLER, M. 1981. Revision von Lathyrus L. Sect. Lathyrostylis (Griseb.) Bässler (Fabaceae). Feddes Repertorium 92: 179-254.
12. BEN BRAHIM, N., A. SALHI, N. CHTOUROU, D. COMBES, AND M. MARRAKCHI. 2002. Isozymic polymporphism and phylogeny of 10 Lathyrus species. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49: 427-436.
13. BURKART, A. 1937. Revision de las especias de "Lathyrus" de la Republica Argentina. Revista de la Faculdad de Agronomia y Veterinaria 8: 1-149.
14. BURKART, A. 1966. Notas sobre las especies Argentinas de Vicia (Leguminosae) del area mesopotamico-pampaena. Darwiniana 14: 161-193.
15. BURNHAM, R. J., AND A. GRAHAM. 1999. The history of Neotropical vegetation: new developments and status. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 546-589.
16. CHTOUROU-GHORBEL, N., B. LAUGA, D. COMBES, AND M. MARRAKCHI. 2001. Comparative genetic diversity studies in the genus Lathyrus using RFLP and RAPD markers. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 62-68.
17. CROFT, A. M., P. C. K. PANG, AND P. W. J. TAYLOR. 1999. Molecular analysis of Lathyrus sativus L. (grasspea) and related Lathyrus species. Euphytica 107: 167-176.
18. CZEFRANOVA, Z. V. 1971. Review of the species of the genus Lens Mill. Novitiates Systematicae Plantarum Vascularum 8: 197-204. [English translation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and National Science Foundation] Amerind Publishing, New Delhi, India.
19. DAVIS, P. H. 1970. Lathyrus. In P. H. Davis [ed.], Flora of Turkey, vol. 3, 328-369. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
20. DE CASTRO, O., S. COZZOLINO, S. L. JURY, AND P. CAPUTO. 2002. Molecular relationships in Genista L. sect. Spartocarpus Spach (Fabaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 231: 91-108.
21. DOGAN, M., A. KENCE, AND C. TIGIN. 1992. Numerical taxonomic study on Turkish Lathyrus (Leguminosae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 49: 333-341.
22. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
23. ENDO, Y., AND H. OHASHI. 1997. Cladistic analysis of phylogenetic relationships among tribes Cicreae, Trifolieae, and Vicieae (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany 84: 523-529.
24. ERIKSSON, T., M. S. HIBBS, A. D. YODER, C. DELWICHE, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 197-211.
25. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
26. FENNELL, S. R., W. POWELL, F. WRIGHT, G. RAMSAY, AND R. WAUGH. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships between Vicia faba (Fabaceae) and related species from trnL sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 212: 247-259.
27. GUNN, C. R. 1969. Genera, types and lectotypes in the tribe Vicieae (Leguminosae). Taxon 18: 725-733.
28. GUNN, C. R., AND J. KLUVE. 1976. Androecium and pistil characters for the tribe Vicieae (Fabaceae). Taxon 25: 563-575.
29. HAMILTON, M. B. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast regions with intraspecific variation. Molecular Ecology 8: 521-523.
30. HUMPHRIES, C. J., AND L. R. PARENTI. 1999. Cladistic biogeography. Interpreting patterns of plant and animal distributions, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
31. INTERNATIONAL LEGUME DATABASE AND INFORMATION SERVICE [ILDIS]. 2002. World database of legumes, version 6.05. ILDIS, Southampton, UK.
32. JOHNSON, K. P., D. M. DROWN, AND D. H. CLAYTON. 2001. A data based parsimony method of cophylogenetic analysis. Zoologica Scripta 30: 79-87.
33. KÄSS, E., AND M. WINK. 1997. Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of Lupinus (Leguminosae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene and ITS 1 + 2 regions of rDNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208: 139-167.
34. KUPICHA, F. K. 1974. Taxonomic studies in the tribe Vicieae (Leguminosae). Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
35. KUPICHA, F. K. 1975. Observations on the vascular anatomy of the tribe Vicieae (Leguminosae). Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 70: 231-242.
36. KUPICHA, F. K. 1976. The infrageneric structure of Vicia. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 34: 287-326.
37. KUPICHA, F. K. 1981. Vicieae. In R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven [eds.], Advances in legume Systematics, part 1, 377-381. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
38. KUPICHA, F. K. 1983. The infrageneric structure of Lathyrus. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 41: 209-244.
39. LAVIN, M., P. S. HERENDEEN, AND M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI. In press. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of the major family lineages immediately following an Early Tertiary emergence. Systematic Biology.
40. LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, vol. 2. Salvius, Stockholm, Sweden.
41. MAYER, M. S., AND S. K. BAGGA. 2002. The phylogeny of Lena (Leguminosae): new insight from ITS sequence analysis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 232: 145-154.
42. MCKENNA, M. C. 1983. Holarctic landmass rearrangement, cosmic events and Cenozoic terrestrial organisms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 459-489.
43. MEULENCAMP, J. E., AND W. SISSINGH. 2003. Tertiary paleogeography and tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Northern and Southern Peri-Tethys platforms and the intermediate domains of the African-Eurasian convergent plate boundary zone. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 196: 209-228.
44. POLHILL, R. M. 1981. Papilionoideae. In R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven [eds.], Advances in legume Systematics, part 1, 191-208. Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew, Richmond, UK.
45. RAMSTEIN, G., F. FLUTEAU, J. BESSE, AND S. JOUSSAUME. 1997. Effect of orogeny, plate motion and land - sea distribution on Eurasian climate change over the past 30 million years. Nature 386: 788-795.
46. RICHARDSON, J. E., R. T. PENNINGTON, T. D. PENNINGTON, AND P. M. HOLLINGSWORTH. 2001. Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of Neotropical rain forest trees. Science 293: 2242-2245.
47. ROSKOV, Y. R., G. P. YAKOVLEV, A. K. SYTIN, AND S. A. JESNIAKOWSKY. 1998. Legumes of Northern Eurasia: information systems on compact dise. [CD-ROM] International Legume Database and Information System, St. Petersburg, Russia.
48. ROZAS, J., AND R. ROZAS. 2001. DNASP 3.53 DNA sequence polymorphism. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
49. SANDERSON, M. J., AND J. J. DOYLE. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in North American Astragalus (Fabaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 18: 395-408.
50. SEIJO, J. G., AND A. FERNANDEZ. 2003. Karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in South American species of Lathyrus (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany 90: 980-987.
51. SENN, H. A. 1938. Experimental data for a revision of the genus Lathyrus. American Journal of Botany 25: 67-78.
52. SIMMONS, M. P., AND H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
53. SIMMONS, M. P., H. OCHOTERENA, AND T. G. CARR. 2001. Incorporation, relative homoplasy and effect of gap characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 50: 454-462.
54. SIMOLA, L. K. 1968. Comparative studies on number of leaflets, venation, and epidermal structure in the genus Lathyrus. Canadian Journal of Botany 46: 71-84.
55. SOLTIS, D. E., M. TAGO-NAKAZAWA, Q. Y. XIANG, J. MURATA, M. WAKA-BAYASHI, AND C. HIBSCH-JETTER. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution in Chrysosplenium (Saxifragaceae) based on matK sequence data. American Journal of Botany 88: 883-893.
56. STEELE, K. P., AND M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses if tribes Trifoleae and Vicieae based on sequences of the plastid gene matK (Papilionoideae: Leguminosae). In B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, part 10, 355-370. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
57. SUC, J.-P. 1984. Origin and evolution of the Mediterranean vegetation and climate in Europe. Nature 307: 429-432.
58. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
59. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, AND J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
60. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, AND D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
61. TSUI, H.-P. 1984. Materiae ad Floram Lathyrorum Sinensium. Bulletin of Botanical Research 4: 36-60. [In Mandarin Chinese]
62. VAN DER HAMMEN, T., AND A. M. CLEEF. 1985. Development of the high Andean Paramo flora and vegetation. In F. Vuilleumier and M. Monasterio [eds.], High altitude tropical biogeography, 153-201. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
63. WHITE, T. J., T. BURNS, S. LEE, AND J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, and T. White [eds.], PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application, 315-322. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
64. WOJCIECHOWSKI, M. F., M. J. SANDERSON, AND J.-M. HU. 1999. Evidence on the monophyly of Astragalus (Fabaceae) and its major subgroups based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS and chloroplast DNA trnL data. Systematic Botany 24: 409-437.
65. WOJCIECHOWSKI, M. F., M. J. SANDERSON, K. P. STEELE, AND A. LISTON. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the 'temperate herbaceous tribes' of Papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. In P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, part 9, 277-298. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
66. WOLFE, J. A. 1975. Some aspects of plant geography of the Northern Hemisphere during the late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 62: 264-279.
67. XU, D. H., J. ABE, M. SAKAI, A. KANAZAWA, AND Y. SHIMAMOTO. 2001. Sequence variation of non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA of soybean and related wild species and its implications for the evolution of different chloroplast haplotypes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 724-732.