Phylogeny and host-specificity of European seed beetles (Coleoptera, Bruchidae), new insights from molecular and ecological data

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 855-865

  Kergoat, Gaël J ^a   Delobel, Alex ^b   Silvain, Jean François ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

12S rRNA; Bayesian inference; Bruchidae; Cytochrome b; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; Host specificity; Maximum likelihood; Parsimony; Phylogenetic inference; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA SEQUENCE; EUROPE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; BEETLES; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EUROPE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

BRUCHIDIUS; BRUCHINAE; BRUCHUS; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA;

EID: 3843131984     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anton K.-W. Revision of the genus Bruchidius. Part I: the B. seminarius group (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Stuttgart. Beitr. Naturkunde Ser. A. 573:1998;1-13
2. Anton K.-W. Bemerkungen zur Faunistik und Taxonomie mitteleuropä ischer Samenkäfer (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Folia Entomol. Hung. 62:2001;43-49
3. Baker R.H, DeSalle R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of the Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;645-673
4. Baker R.H, Yu X, DeSalle R. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;427-436
5. Becerra J.X. Insects on plants: macroevolutionary chemical trends in host use. Science. 276:1997;253-256
6. Borowiec L. The genera of seed-beetles (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Polsk. Pismo Entomol. 57:1987;3-207
7. Borowiec, L., 1988. Bruchidae-Strakowce (Insecta: Coleoptera). Fauna Polski-Fauna Poloniae, Tom. 11. Pantstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa)
8. Clary D.O, Wolstenholme D.R. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J. Mol. Evol. 22:1985;252-271
9. Cummings M.P, Handley S.A, Myers D.S, Reed D.L, Rokas A, Winka K. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 52:2003;477-487
10. Cunningham C.W. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;733-740
11. Delobel A, Delobel B. Les plantes hôtes des bruches de la faune de France, une analyse critique (Coleoptera Bruchidae). Bull. Soc. Linn. Lyon. 72:2003;199-221
12. DeSalle R, Freedman T, Prager E.M, Wilson A.C. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 26:1987;157-164
13. Douady C.J, Delsuc F, Boucher Y, Doolittle W.F, Douzery E.J.P. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:2003;248-254
14. Ehrlich P.R, Raven P.H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution. 18:1964;586-608
15. Farrell B.D, Mitter C. Phylogenesis of insect/plant interactions: have Phyllobrotica leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) and the Lamiales diversified in parallel? Evolution. 44:1990;1389-1403
16. Farris J.S, Källersjö M, Kluge A.G, Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:1994;315-319
17. Giribet G, Wheeler W.C. On gaps. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13:1999;132-143
18. Giribet G. Stability in phylogenetic formulations and its relationship to nodal support. Syst. Biol. 52:2003;554-564
19. Gu X, Fu Y.-X, Li W.-H. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;546-557
20. Hillis D.M, Huelsenbeck J.P, Cunningham C.W. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science. 264:1994;671-677
21. Huelsenbeck J.P, Ronquist F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 17:2001;754-755
22. Huelsenbeck J.P, Miller R.E, Ronquist F. Potential applications and pitfalls of bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:2002;673-688
23. Janzen D.H. The defense of legumes against herbivores. Polhill R.M, Raven P.H. Advances in Legume Systematics 2. 1981;951-977 The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
24. Jermy T, Szentesi A. Evolutionary aspects of host plant specialisation - a study on bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). OIKOS. 101:2003;196-204
25. Johnson C.D. Seed beetle host specificity and the systematics of the Leguminosae. Polhill R.M, Raven P.H. Advances in Legume Systematics 2. 1981;995-1027 The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
26. Jordal B.H, Normark B.B, Farrell B.D, Kirkendall L.R. Extraordinary haplotype diversity in haplodiploid inbreeders: phylogenetics and evolution of the bark beetle genus Coccotrypes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 23:2002;171-188
27. Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20:1984;86-93
28. Lawrence J.F. Coleoptera. Parker S.P. Synopsis and Classification of Living Organism. vol 2:1982;482-553 MacGraw-Hill, New-York
29. Marvaldi A.E, Sequeira A.S, O'Brien C.W, Farrell B.D. Molecular and morphological phylogenetics of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea): do niche shifts accompany diversification? Syst. Biol. 51:2002;761-785
30. Miller R.E, Buckley T.R, Manos P.S. An examination of the monophyly of morning glory taxa using Bayesian phylogenetics inference. Syst. Bot. 51:2002;740-753
31. Mitter C, Farrell B.D, Wiegmann B. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am. Nat. 132:1988;107-128
32. Monteiro A, Pierce N.E. Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and Ef-1 α gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18:2001;264-281
33. Posada D, Crandall K.A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;817-818
34. Powell, J.A., Mitter, C., Farrell, B.D., 1999. Evolution of larval feeding preferences in Lepidoptera. In: Kristensen, P.N., (Ed.), Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, vol. 1. Chapter 20, pp. 403-422
35. Silvain J.-F, Delobel A. Phylogeny of west African Caryedon (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): congruence between molecular and morphological data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;533-541
36. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:1994;651-702
37. Sorenson, M.D., 1999. Tree Rot. v2. Boston University, Boston
38. Suzuki Y, Glazko G.V, Nei M. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;16138-16143
39. Swofford D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony*and Other Methods. Version 4.0b10. 2002;Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
40. Termonia A, Hsiao T.H, Pasteels J.M, Milinkovitch M. Feeding specialization and host-derived chemical defense in chrysomeline leaf beetles did not lead to an evolutionary dead end. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;3909-3914
41. Thompson J.D, Gibson T.J, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D.G. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1997;4876-4882
42. Wahlberg N. The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host-plant specialization in Melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution. 55:2001;522-537
43. Wheeler W.C, Gatesy J, DeSalle R. Elision: a method for accomodating multiple molecular sequence alignments with alignment-ambiquous sites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:1995;1-9
44. Wilf P, Labandeira C.C, Kress W.J, Staines C.L, Windsor D.M, Allen A.L, Johnson K.R. Timing the radiation of leaf beetles: hispines on gingers from latest Cretaceous to recent. Science. 289:2000;291-294
45. Wink M, Mohamed G.I.A. Evolution of chemical defense traits in the Leguminosae: mapping of distribution patterns of secondary metabolites on a molecular phylogeny inferred from nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 31:2003;897-917
46. Yang Z. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:1994;105-111