RAD18 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase independently suppress the access of nonhomologous end joining to double-strand breaks and facilitate homologous recombination-mediated repair

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 2562-2571

  Saberi, Alihossein ^a   Hochegger, Helfrid ^a   Szuts, David ^b   Lan, Li ^c   Yasui, Akira ^c   Sale, Julian E ^b   Taniguchi, Yoshihito ^a   Murakawa, Yasuhiro ^a   Zeng, Weihua ^d   Yokomori, Kyoko ^d   Helleday, Thomas ^e   Teraoka, Hirobumi ^f   Arakawa, Hiroshi ^g   Buerstedde, Jean Marie ^g   Takeda, Shunichi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMPTOTHECIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLTRANSFERASE 1; PROTEIN RAD18; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELETION MUTANT; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; FUNGAL GENE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RAD18 GENE; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, NUCLEAR; CAMPTOTHECIN; CELL LINE; CHICKENS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA TOPOISOMERASES, TYPE I; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; POLY(ADP-RIBOSE) POLYMERASES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 33847374179     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01243-06     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adachi, N., S. So, and H. Koyama. 2004. Loss of nonhomologous end joining confers camptothecin resistance in DT40 cells, Implications for the repair of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 279:37343-37348.
2. Arakawa, H., G. L. Moldovan, H. Saribasak, N. N. Saribasak, S. Jentsch, and J. M. Buetstedde. 2006. A role for PCNA ubiquitination in immunoglobulin hypermutation. PloS Biol. 4:e366.
3. Bailly, V., J. Lamb, P. Sung, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1994. Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev. 8:811-820.
4. Bailly, V., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1997. Domains required for dimerization of yeast Rad6 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and Rad18 DNA binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4536-4543.
5. Bennett, C. B., L. K. Lewis, G. Karthikeyan, K. S. Lobachev, Y. H. Jin, J. F. Sterling, J. R. Snipe, and M. A. Resnick. 2001. Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nat. Genet. 29:426-434.
6. Broomfield, S., T. Hryciw, and W. Xiao. 2001. DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 486:167-184.
7. Burkle, A. 2005. Poly(ADP-ribose). The most elaborate metabolite of NAD+. FEBS J. 272:4576-4589.
8. Chang, I. Y., M. H. Kim, H. B. Kim, Y. L. Do, S. H. Kim, H. Y. Kim, and H. J. You. 2005. Small interfering RNA-induced suppression of ERCC1 enhances sensitivity of human cancer cells to cisplatin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 327:225-233.
9. Chen, S., A. A. Davies, D. Sagan, and H. D. Ulrich. 2005. The RING finger ATPase Rad5p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contributes to DNA double-strand break repair in a ubiquitin-independent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:5878-5886.
10. Connelly, J. C., and D. R. Leach. 2004. Repair of DNA covalently linked to protein. Mol. Cell 13:307-316.
11. Couedel, C., K. D. Mills, M. Barchi, L. Shen, A. Olshen, R. D. Johnson, A. Nussenzweig, J. Essers, R. Kanaar, G. C. Li, F. W. Alt, and M. Jasin. 2004. Collaboration of homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining factors for the survival and integrity of mice and cells. Genes Dev. 18:1293-1304.
12. Doherty, A. J., and S. P. Jackson. 2001. DNA repair: how Ku makes ends meet. Curr. Biol. 11:R920-R924.
13. Dracopoli, N. C., G. A. Bruns, G. M. Brodeur, G. M. Landes, T. C. Matise, M. F. Seldin, J. M. Vance, and A. Weith. 1994. Report and abstracts of the First International Workshop on Human Chromosome 1 Mapping 1994. Bethesda, Maryland, March 25-27,1994. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 67:144-165.
14. Frank-Vaillant, M., and S. Marcand. 2002. Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 10:1189-1199.
15. Friedberg, E. C. 2005. Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:943-953.
16. Friedberg, E. C., A. J. Bardwell, L. Bardwell, W. J. Feaver, R. D. Romberg, J. Q. Svejstrup, A. E. Tomkinson, and Z. Wang. 1995. Nucleotide excision repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: its relationship to specialized mitotic recombination and RNA polymerase II basal transcription. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 347:63-68.
17. 2 phase DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 276:44413-44418.
18. Haber, J. E. 1999. DNA recombination: the replication connection. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:271-275.
19. Higgins, N. P., K. Kato, and B. Strauss. 1976. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 101:417-425.
20. Hochegger, H., D. Dejsuphong, T. Fukushima, C. Morrison, E. Sonoda, V. Schreiber, G. Y. Zhao, A. Saberi, M. Masutani, N. Adachi, H. Koyama, G. de Murcia, and S. Takeda. 2006. Parp-1 protects homologous recombination from interference by Ku and Ligase IV in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 25: 1305-1314.
21. Hochegger, H., E. Sonoda, and S. Takeda. 2004. Post-replication repair in DT40 cells: translesion polymerases versus recombinases. Bioessays 26:151-158.
22. Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G. L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-141.
23. Hoeijmakers, J. H. 2001. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411:366-374.
24. Jeggo, P. A. 1998. DNA breakage and repair. Adv. Genet. 38:185-218.
25. Jentsch, S., J. P. McGrath, and A. Varshavsky. 1987. The yeast DNA repair gene RAD6 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Nature 329:131-134.
26. Johnson, R. D., and M. Jasin. 2001. Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 29:196-201.
27. Johnson, R. D., and M. Jasin. 2000. Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 19:3398-3407.
28. Johnson, R. D., N. Liu, and M. Jasin. 1999. Mammalian XRCC2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Nature 401:397-399.
29. Kannouche, P. L., and A. R. Lehmann. 2004. Ubiquitination of PCNA and the polymerase switch in human cells. Cell Cycle 3:1011-1013.
30. Kawamoto, T., K. Araki, E. Sonoda, Y. M. Yamashita, K. Harada, K. Kikuchi, C. Masutani, F. Hanaoka, K. Nozaki, N. Hashimoto, and S. Takeda. 2005. Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 20:793-799.
31. Lawrence, C. 1994. The RAD6 DNA repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: what does it do, and how does it do it? Bioessays 16:253-258.
32. Lehmann, A. R. 2002. Replication of damaged DNA in mammalian cells: new solutions to an old problem. Mutat. Res. 509:23-34.
33. Li, B., S. Navarro, N. Kasahara, and L. Comai. 2004. Identification and biochemical characterization of a Werner's syndrome protein complex with Ku70/80 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:13659-13667.
34. Li, Z., W. Xiao, J. J. McCormick, and V. M. Maher. 2002. Identification of a protein essential for a major pathway used by human cells to avoid UV-induced DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:4459-4464.
35. Liang, F., P. J. Romanienko, D. T. Weaver, P. A. Jeggo, and M. Jasin. 1996. Chromosomal double-strand break repair in Ku80-deficient cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8929-8933.
36. Mohindra, A., L. E. Hays, E. N. Phillips, B. D. Preston, T. Helleday, and M. Meuth. 2002. Defects in homologous recombination repair in mismatch-repair-deficient tumour cell lines. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11:2189-2200.
37. Nelson, J. R., C. W. Lawrence, and D. C. Hinkle. 1996. Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase zeta. Science 272:1646-1649.
38. Nojima, K., H. Hochegger, A. Saberi, T. Fukushima, K. Kikuchi, M. Yoshimura, B. J. Orelli, D. K. Bishop, S. Hirano, M. Ohzeki, M. Ishiai, K. Yamamoto, M. Takata, H. Arakawa, J. M. Buerstedde, M. Yamazoe, T. Kawamoto, K. Araki, J. A. Takahashi, N. Hashimoto, S. Takeda, and E. Sonoda. 2005. Multiple repair pathways mediate tolerance to chemotherapeutic cross-linking agents in vertebrate cells. Cancer Res. 65:11704-11711.
39. Ohmori, H., E. C. Friedberg, R. P. Fuchs, M. F. Goodman, F. Hanaoka, D. Hinkle, T. A. Kunkel, C. W. Lawrence, Z. Livneh, T. Nohmi, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, T. Todo, G. C. Walker, Z. Wang, and R. Woodgate. 2001. The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol. Cell 8:7-8.
40. Okada, T., E. Sonoda, Y. M. Yamashita, S. Koyoshi, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi. M. Takata, O. Ogawa, and S. Takeda. 2002. Involvement of vertebrate polkappa in Rad18-independent postreplication repair of UV damage. J. Biol. Chem. 277:48690-48695.
41. Okada, T., E. Sonoda, M. Yoshimura, Y. Kawano, H. Saya, M. Kohzaki, and S. Takeda. 2005. Multiple roles of vertebrate REV genes in DNA repair and recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:6103-6111.
42. O-Wang, J., K. Kajiwara, K. Kawamura, M. Kimura, H. Miyagishima, H. Koseki, and M. Tagawa. 2002. An essential role for REV3 in mammalian cell survival: absence of REV3 induces p53-independent embryonic death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293:1132-1137.
43. Paques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:349-404.
44. Pierce, A. J., P. Hu, M. Han, N. Ellis, and M. Jasin. 2001. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 15:3237-3242.
45. Pommier, Y., C. Redon, V. A. Rao, J. A. Seiler, O. Sordet, H. Takemura, S. Antony, L. Meng, Z. Liao, G. Kohlhagen, H. Zhang, and K. W. Kohn. 2003. Repair of and checkpoint response to topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 532:173-203.
46. Prakash, S., R. E. Johnson, and L. Prakash. 2005. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74:317-353.
47. Prakash, S., P. Sung, and L. Prakash. 1993. DNA repair genes and proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27:33-70.
48. Ross, A. L., L. J. Simpson, and J. E. Sale. 2005. Vertebrate DNA damage tolerance requires the C-terminus but not BRCT or transferase domains of REV1. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1280-1289.
49. Rouet, P., F. Smih, and M. Jasin. 1994. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8096-8106.
50. Saleh-Gohari, N., H. E. Bryant, N. Schultz, K. M. Parker, T. N. Cassei, and T. Helleday. 2005. Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:7158-7169.
51. Simon, J. A., P. Szankasi, D. K. Nguyen, C. Ludlow, H. M. Dunstan, C. J. Roberts, E. L. Jensen, L. H. Hartwell, and S. H. Friend. 2000. Differential toxicities of anticancer agents among DNA repair and checkpoint mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cancer Res. 60:328-333.
52. Simpson, L. J., A. L. Ross, D. Szuts, C. A. Alviani, V. H. Oestergaard, K. J. Patel, and J. E. Sale. 2006. RAD18-independent ubiquitination of proliferating-cell nuclear antigen in the avian cell line DT40. EMBO. Rep. 7:927-932.
53. Sonoda, E., T. Okada, G. Y. Zhao, S. Tateishi, K. Araki, M. Yamaizumi, T. Yagi, N. S. Verkaik, D. C. van Gent, M. Takata, and S. Takeda. 2003. Multiple roles of Rev3, the catalytic subunit of polzeta in maintaining genome stability in vertebrates. EMBO J. 22:3188-3197.
54. Sonoda, E., M. S. Sasaki, J. M. Buerstedde, O. Bezzubova, A. Shinohara, H. Ogawa, M. Takata, Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, and S. Takeda. 1998. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. EMBO J. 17:598-608.
55. Stelter, P., and H. D. Ulrich. 2003. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425:188-191.
56. Szuts, D., L. J. Simpson, S. Kabani, M. Yamazoe, and J. E. Sale. 2006. Role for RAD18 in homologous recombination in DT40. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:8032-8041.
57. Takata, M., M. S. Sasaki, E. Sonoda, C. Morrison, M. Hashimoto, H. Utsumi, Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, A. Shinohara, and S. Takeda. 1998. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17:5497-5508.
58. Tateishi, S., H. Niwa, J. Miyazaki, S. Fujimoto, H. Inoue, and M. Yamaizumi. 2003. Enhanced genomic instability and defective postreplication repair in RAD18 knockout mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:474-481.
59. Tauchi, H., J. Kobayashi, K. Morishima, D. C. van Gent, T. Shiraishi, N. S. Verkaik, D. vanHeems, E. Ito, A. Nakamura, E. Sonoda, M. Takata, S. Takeda, S. Matsuura, and K. Komatsu. 2002. Nbs1 is essential for DNA repair by homologous recombination in higher vertebrate cells. Nature 420: 93-98.
60. Ulrich, H. D. 2004. How to activate a damage-tolerant polymerase: consequences of PCNA modifications by ubiquitin and SUMO. Cell Cycle 3:15-18.
61. Van Sloun, P. P., I. Varlet, E. Sonneveld, J. J. Boei, R. J. Romeijn, J. C. Eeken, and N. De Wind. 2002. Involvement of mouse Rev3 in tolerance of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:2159-2169.
62. Watanabe, K., S. Tateishi, M. Kawasuji, T. Tsurimoto, H. Inoue, and M. Yamaizumi. 2004. Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J. 23:3886-3896.
63. Yamashita, Y. M., T. Okada, T. Matsusaka, E. Sonoda, G. Y. Zhao, K. Araki, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, and S. Takeda. 2002. RAD18 and RAD54 cooperatively contribute to maintenance of genomic stability in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 21:5558-5566.
64. Yamazoe, M., E. Sonoda, H. Hochegger, and S. Takeda. 2004. Reverse genetic studies of the DNA damage response in the chicken B lymphocyte line DT40. DNA Repair 3:1175-1185.
65. Yoshimura, A., K. Nishino, J. Takezawa, S. Tada, T. Kobayashi, E. Sonoda, T. Kawamoto, S. Takeda, Y. Ishii, K. Yamada, T. Enomoto, and M. Seki. 2006. A novel Rad18 function involved in protection of the vertebrate genome after exposure to camptothecin. DNA Repair 5:1307-1316.