Role for RAD18 in homologous recombination in DT40 cells

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 21, 2006, Pages 8032-8041

  Szüts, Dávid ^a   Simpson, Laura J ^a   Kabani, Sarah ^a   Yamazoe, Mitsuyoshi ^b   Sale, Julian E ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; RAD18 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CELL LINE; CELL STRAIN DT40; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE; GENE CONVERSION; GENE DELETION; GENE DISRUPTION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; RAD18 GENE; REPORTER GENE; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; UBIQUITINATION; VERTEBRATE; XRCC3 GENE; YEAST;

ANIMALS; AVIAN PROTEINS; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHICKENS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE CONVERSION; GENES, IMMUNOGLOBULIN; GENES, REPORTER; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 33750309123     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01291-06     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Arakawa, H., J. Hauschild, and J. M. Buerstedde. 2002. Requirement of the activation-induced deaminase (AID) gene for immunoglobulin gene conversion. Science 295:1301-1306.
2. Arakawa, H., D. Lodygin, and J. M. Buerstedde. 2001. Mutant loxP vectors for selectable marker recycle and conditional knockouts. BMC Biotechnol. 1:7.
3. Bailly, V., S. Lauder, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1997. Yeast DNA repair proteins Rad6 and Rad18 form a heterodimer that has ubiquitin conjugating, DNA binding, and ATP hydrolytic activities. J. Biol. Chem. 272:23360-23365.
4. -/- mutant of the chicken DT40 cell line. Cell 89:185-193.
5. Bi, X., L. R. Barkley, D. M. Slater, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, H. Ohmori, and C. Vaziri. 2006. Rad18 regulates DNA polymerase κ and is required for recovery from S-phase checkpoint-mediated arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:3527-3540.
6. Bienko, M., C. M. Green, N. Crosetto, F. Rudolf, G. Zapart, B. Coull, P. Kannouche, G. Wider, M. Peter, A. R. Lehmann, K. Hofmann, and I. Dikic. 2005. Ubiquitin-binding domains in Y-family polymerases regulate translesion synthesis. Science 310:1821-1824.
7. Bishop, D. K., U. Ear, A. Bhattacharyya, C. Calderone, M. Beckett, R. R. Weichselbaum, and A. Shinohara. 1998. Xrcc3 is required for assembly of Rad51 complexes in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 273:21482-21488.
8. Bridge, W. L., C. J. Vandenberg, R. J. Franklin, and K. Hiom. 2005. The BRIP1 helicase functions independently of BRCA1 in the Fanconi anemia pathway for DNA crosslink repair. Nat. Genet. 37:953-957.
9. Broomfield, S., T. Hryciw, and W. Xiao. 2001. DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 486:167-184.
10. Buerstedde, J. M., C. A. Reynaud, E. H. Humphries, W. Olson, D. L. Ewert, and J. C. Weill. 1990. Light chain gene conversion continues at high rate in an ALV-induced cell line. EMBO J. 9:921-927.
11. Buerstedde, J. M., and S. Takeda. 1991. Increased ratio of targeted to random integration after transfection of chicken B-cell lines. Cell 67:179-188.
12. Carlson, L. M., W. T. McCormack, C. E. Postema, E. H. Humphries, and C. B. Thompson, 1990. Templated insertions in the rearranged chicken IgL V gene segment arise by intrachromosomal gene conversion. Genes Dev. 4:536-547.
13. Di Noia, J., and M. S. Neuberger. 2002. Altering the pathway of immunoglobulin hypermutation by inhibiting uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nature 419:43-48.
14. Di Noia, J. M., and M. S. Neuberger. 2004. Immunoglobulin gene conversion in chicken DT40 cells largely proceeds through an abasic site intermediate generated by excision of the uracil produced by AID-mediated deoxycytidine deamination. Eur. J. Immunol. 34:504-508.
15. Dronkert, M. L., H. B. Beverloo, R. D. Johnson, J. H. Hoeijmakers, M. Jasin, and R. Kanaar. 2000. Mouse RAD54 affects DNA double-strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3147-3156.
16. Fujimori, A., S. Tachiiri, E. Sonoda, L. H. Thompson, P. K. Dhar, M. Hiraoka, S. Takeda, Y. Zhang, M. Reth, and M. Takata. 2001. Rad52 partially substitutes for the Rad51 paralog XRCC3 in maintaining chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 20:5513-5520.
17. Harris, R. S., J. E. Sale, S. K. Petersen-Mahrt, and M. S. Neuberger. 2002. AID is essential for immunoglobulin V gene conversion in a cultured B-cell line. Curr. Biol. 12:435-438.
18. Hatanaka, A., M. Yamazoe, J. E. Sale, M. Takata, K. Yamamoto, H. Kitao, E. Sonoda, K. Kikuchi, Y. Yonetani, and S. Takeda. 2005. Similar effects of Brca2 truncation and Rad51 paralog deficiency on immunoglobulin V gene diversification in DT40 cells support an early role for Rad51 paralogs in homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:1124-1134.
19. Higgins, N. P., K. Kato, and B. Strauss. 1976. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 101:417-425.
20. Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G. L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-141.
21. Kannouche, P. L., J. Wing, and A. R. Lehmann. 2004. Interaction of human DNA polymerase η with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 14:491-500.
22. Kim, S., E. H. Humphries, L. Tjoelker, L. Carlson, and C. B. Thompson. 1990. Ongoing diversification of the rearranged immunoglobulin light-chain gene in a bursal lymphoma cell line. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:3224-3231.
23. Moynahan, M. E., A. J. Pierce, and M. Jasin. 2001. BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol. Cell 7:263-272.
24. Okada, T., E. Sonoda, Y. M. Yamashita, S. Koyoshi, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, M. Takata, O. Ogawa, and S. Takeda. 2002. Involvement of vertebrate polκ in Rad18-independent postreplication repair of UV damage. J. Biol. Chem. 277:48690-48695.
25. Pages, V., and R. P. Fuchs. 2002. How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells? Oncogene 21:8957-8966.
26. Pierce, A. J., R. D. Johnson, L. H. Thompson, and M. Jasin. 1999. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 13:2633-2638.
27. Prakash, S., R. E. Johnson, and L. Prakash. 2005. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74:317-353.
28. Ross, A. L., L. J. Simpson, and J. E. Sale. 2005. Vertebrate DNA damage tolerance requires the C terminus but not BRCT or transferase domains of REV1. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1280-1289.
29. Rupp, W. D., and P. Howard-Flanders. 1968. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J. Mol. Biol. 31:291-304.
30. Sale, J. E. 2004. Immunoglobulin diversification in DT40: a model for vertebrate DNA damage tolerance. DNA Repair 3:693-702.
31. Sale, J. E., D. M. Calandrini, M. Takata, S. Takeda, and M. S. Neuberger. 2001. Ablation of XRCC2/3 transforms immunoglobulin V gene conversion into somatic hypermutation. Nature 412:921-926.
32. Shen, X., S. Jun, L. E. O'Neal, E. Sonoda, M. Bemark, J. E. Sale, and L. Li. 2006. REV3 and REV1 play major roles in recombination-independent repair of DNA interstrand cross-links mediated by monoubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). J. Biol. Chem. 281:13869-13872.
33. Simpson, L. J., A. L. Ross, D. Szuts, C. A. Alviani, V. H. Oestergaard, K. J. Patel, and J. E. Sale. 2006. RAD18-independent ubiquitination of proliferating-cell nuclear antigen in the avian cell line DT40. EMBO Rep. 7:927-932.
34. Simpson, L. J., and J. E. Sale, 2003. Rev1 is essential for DNA damage tolerance and non-templated immunoglobulin gene mutation in a vertebrate cell line. EMBO J. 22:1654-1664.
35. Simpson, L. J., and J. E. Sale. 2005. UBE2V2 (MMS2) is not required for effective immunoglobulin gene conversion or DNA damage tolerance in DT40. DNA Repair 4:503-510.
36. Singleton, M. R., L. M. Wentzell, Y. Liu, S. C. West, and D. B. Wigley. 2002. Structure of the single-strand annealing domain of human RAD52 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:13492-13497.
37. Sonoda, E., T. Okada, G. Y. Zhao, S. Tateishi, K. Araki, M. Yamaizumi, T. Yagi, N. S. Verkaik, D. C. van Gent, M. Takata, and S. Takeda. 2003. Multiple roles of Rev3, the catalytic subunit of polζ in maintaining genome stability in vertebrates. EMBO J. 22:3188-3197.
38. Stark, J. M., A. J. Pierce, J. Oh, A. Pastink, and M. Jasin. 2004. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:9305-9316.
39. Takata, M., M. S. Sasaki, S. Tachiiri, T. Fukushima, E. Sonoda, D. Schild, L. H. Thompson, and S. Takeda. 2001. Chromosome instability and defective recombinational repair in knockout mutants of the five Rad51 paralogs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2858-2866.
40. Tan, T. L. R. Kanaar, and C. Wyman. 2003. Rad54, a Jack of all trades in homologous recombination. DNA Repair 2:787-794.
41. Tateishi, S., H. Niwa, J. Miyazaki, S. Fujimoto, H. Inoue, and M. Yamaizumi. 2003. Enhanced genomic instability and defective postreplication repair in RAD18 knockout mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:474-481.
42. Tateishi, S., Y. Sakuraba, S. Masuyama, H. Inoue, and M. Yamaizumi. 2000. Dysfunction of human Rad18 results in defective postreplication repair and hypersensitivity to multiple mutagens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7927-7932.
43. Yamashita, Y. M., T. Okada, T. Matsusaka, E. Sonoda, G. Y. Zhao, K. Araki, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, and S. Takeda. 2002. RAD18 and RAD54 cooperatively contribute to maintenance of genomic stability in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 21:5558-5566.
44. Yang, H., Q. Li, J. Fan, W. K. Holloman, and N. P. Pavletich. 2005. The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA-ssDNA junction. Nature 433:653-657.
45. Yonetani, Y., H. Hochegger, E. Sonoda, S. Shinya, H. Yoshikawa, S. Takeda, and M. Yamazoe. 2005. Differential and collaborative actions of Rad51 paralog proteins in cellular response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:4544-4552.
46. Zhang, H., and C. W. Lawrence. 2005. The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:15954-15959.
47. Zhang, Y., C. Riesterer, A. M. Ayrall, F. Sablitzky, T. D. Littlewood, and M. Reth. 1996, Inducible site-directed recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:543-548.