Post-replication repair in DT40 cells: Translesion polymerases versus recombinases

BioEssays

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 151-158

  Hochegger, Helfrid ^a   Sonoda, Eichiro ^a   Takeda, Shunichi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA POLYMERASE; RECOMBINASE;

ANIMAL CELL; BACTERIAL GENETICS; CELL LINE; CELL STRAIN; CELL STRAIN DT40; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA REPLICATION ORIGIN; DNA SYNTHESIS; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MAMMALIAN GENETICS; NONHUMAN; POSTREPLICATION REPAIR; REPLICATION FORK; REVIEW; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CHICKENS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; RECOMBINASES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GALLUS GALLUS; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 1042268177     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.10403     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 1993;362:709-715.
2. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W. DNA Repair and mutagenesis. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol 1995
3. Michel B, Ehrlich SD, Uzest M. DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest. Embo J 1997;16:430-438.
4. Flores-Rozas H, Kolodner RD. Links between replication, recombination and genome instability in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 2000;25:196-200.
5. Haber JE. DNA repair. Gatekeepers of recombination. Nature 1999;398:665-667.
6. Lehmann AR. Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 1972;66:319-337.
7. Higgins NP, Kato K, Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 1976;101:417-425.
8. Rupp WD, Wilde CE 3rd, Reno DL, Howard-Flanders P. Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 1971;61:25-44.
9. Courcelle J, Hanawalt PC. Participation of recombination proteins in rescue of arrested replication forks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli need not involve recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:8196-8202.
10. Courcelle J, Ganesan AK, Hanawalt PC. Therefore, what are recombination proteins there for? Bioessays 2001;23:463-470.
11. Ohmori H, et al. The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol Cell 2001;8:7-8.
12. Sonoda E, Morrison C, Yamashita YM, Takata M, Takeda S. Reverse genetic studies of homologous DNA recombination using the chicken B-lymphocyte line, DT40. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001;356:111-117.
13. Eggleston AK, West SC. Exchanging partners: recombination in E. coli. Trends Genet 1996;12:20-26.
14. Clark AJ. recA mutants of E. coli K12: a personal turning point. Bioessays 1996;18:767-772.
15. West SC, Cassuto E, Howard-Flanders P. recA protein promotes homologous-pairing and strand-exchange reactions between duplex DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981;78:2100-2104.
16. Clark A, Margulies A. Isolation and characterization of recombination deficient mutants of E. coli K-12. Proc Natl Acad Sc USA 1965;53:451-459.
17. Rupp WD, Howard-Flanders P. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol 1968;31:291-304.
18. Tang M, Shen X, Frank EG, O'Donnell M, Woodgate R, Goodman MF. UmuD′(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8919-8924.
19. Goodman MF. Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem 2002;71:17-50.
20. Berdichevsky A, Izhar L, Livneh Z. Error-free recombinational repair predominates over mutagenic translesion replication in E. coli. Mol Cell 2002;10:917-924.
21. Hartwell L. Defects in a cell cycle checkpoint may be responsible for the genomic instability of cancer cells. Cell 1992;71:543-546.
22. Santocanale C, Diffley JF. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 1998;395:615-618.
23. Shirahige K, Hori Y, Shiraishi K, Yamashita M, Takahashi K, Obuse C, Tsurimoto T, Yoshikawa H. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 1998;395:618-621.
24. Prakash L. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol Gen Genet 1981;184:471-478.
25. Resnick MA, Boyce J, Cox B. Postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1981;146:285-290.
26. Friedberg EC. Nucleotide excision repair of DNA in eukaryotes: comparisons between human cells and yeast. Cancer Surv 1985;4:529-555.
27. Prakash S, Prakash L. Nucleotide excision repair in yeast. Mutat Res 2000;451:13-24.
28. Symington LS. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002;66:630-670, table of contents.
29. Broomfield S, Hryciw T, Xiao W. DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 2001;486:167-184.
30. Lawrence C. The RAD6 DNA repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: what does it do, and how does it do it? Bioessays 1994;16:253-258.
31. Bailly V, Lauder S, Prakash S, Prakash L. Yeast DNA repair proteins Rad6 and Rad18 form a heterodimer that has ubiquitin conjugating, DNA binding, and ATP hydrolytic activities. J Biol Chem 1997;272:23360-23365.
32. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 2002;419:135-141.
33. Lawrence CW. Cellular roles of DNA polymerase zeta and Rev1 protein. DNA Repair (Amst) 2002;1:425-435.
34. Johnson RE, Washington MT, Haracska L, Prakash S, Prakash L. Eukaryotic polymerases iota and zeta act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature 2000;406:1015-1019.
35. Johnson RE, Haracska L, Prakash S, Prakash L. Role of DNA polymerase zeta in the bypass of a (6-4) TT photoproduct. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:3558-3563.
36. Haracska L, Unk I, Johnson RE, Johansson E, Burgers PM, Prakash S, Prakash L. Roles of yeast DNA polymerases delta and zeta and of Rev1 in the bypass of abasic sites. Genes Dev 2001;15:945-954.
37. Nelson JR, Lawrence CW, Hinkle DC. Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein. Nature 1996;382:729-731.
38. Nelson JR, Gibbs PE, Nowicka AM, Hinkle DC, Lawrence CW. Evidence for a second function for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rev1p. Mol Microbiol 2000;37:549-554.
39. Lemontt JF. Mutants of yeast defective in mutation induced by ultraviolet light. Genetics 1971;68:21-33.
40. McDonald JP, Levine AS, Woodgate R. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene, a homologue of Escherichia coli dinB and umuC, is DNA damage inducible and functions in a novel error-free postreplication repair mechanism. Genetics 1997;147:1557-1568.
41. Zhang H, Siede W. UV-induced T → C transition at a TT photoproduct site is dependent on Saccharomyces cerevisiae polymerase eta in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:1262-1267.
42. Bresson A, Fuchs RP. Lesion bypass in yeast cells: Pol eta participates in a multi-DNA polymerase process. Embo J 2002;21:3881-3887.
43. Torres-Ramos CA, Prakash S, Prakash L. Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:2419-2426.
44. Schiestl RH, Prakash S, Prakash L. The SRS2 suppressor of rad6 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acts by channeling DNA lesions into the RAD52 DNA repair pathway. Genetics 1990;124:817-831.
45. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, Kowalczykowski SC, Le Cam E, Fabre F. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 2003;423:309-312.
46. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, Villemain J, Reddy MS, Klein H, Ellenberger T, Sung P. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 2003;423:305-309.
47. Muris DF, Vreeken K, Carr AM, Broughton BC, Lehmann AR, Lohman PH, Pastink A. Cloning the RAD51 homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res 1993;21:4586-4591.
48. Wang SW, Goodwin A, Hickson ID, Norbury CJ. Involvement of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Srs2 in cellular responses to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:2963-2972.
49. Bernark M, Khamlichi AA, Davies SL, Neuberger MS. Disruption of mouse polymerase zeta (Rev3) leads to embryonic lethality and impairs blastocyst development in vitro. Curr Biol 2000;10:1213-1216.
50. Esposito G, Godindagger I, Klein U, Yaspo ML, Cumano A, Rajewsky K. Disruption of the Rev31-encoded catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta in mice results in early embryonic lethality. Curr Biol 2000;10:1221-1224.
51. Wittschieben J, Shivji MK, Lalani E, Jacobs MA, Marini F, Gearhart PJ, Rosewell I, Stamp G, Wood RD. Disruption of the developmentally regulated Rev31 gene causes embryonic lethality Curr Biol 2000;10:1217-1220.
52. Masutani C, Kusumoto R, Yamada A, Yuasa M, Araki M, Nogimori T, Yokoi M, Eki T, Iwai S, Hanaoka F. Xeroderma pigmentosum variant: from a human genetic disorder to a novel DNA polymerase. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2000;65:71-80.
53. Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Matsuda Y, Ushio N, Ikeo K, Ogawa T. Cloning of human, mouse and fission yeast recombination genes homologous to RAD51 and recA. Nat Genet 1993;4:239-243.
54. Rijkers T, Van Den Ouweland J, Morolli B, Rolink AG, Baarends WM, Van Sloun PP, Lohman PH, Pastink A. Targeted inactivation of mouse RAD52 reduces homologous recombination but not resistance to ionizing radiation. Mol Cell Biol 1998;18:6423-6429.
55. Liang F, Han M, Romanienko PJ, Jasin M. Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5172-5177.
56. Takata M, Sasaki MS, Sonoda E, Morrison C, Hashimoto M, Utsumi H, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Shinohara A, Takeda S. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. Embo J 1998;17:5497-5508.
57. Doherty AJ, Jackson SP. DNA repair: how Ku makes ends meet. Curr Biol 2001;11:R920-R924.
58. Tsuzuki T, Fujii Y, Sakumi K, Tominaga Y, Nakao K, Sekiguchi M, Matsushiro A, Yoshimura Y, Morita T. Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:6236-6240.
59. Kanaar R, et al. Human and mouse homologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 DNA repair gene: evidence for functional conservation. Curr Biol 1996;6:828-838.
60. Yamamoto A, Taki T, Yagi H, Habu T, Yoshida K, Yoshimura Y, Yamamoto K, Matsushiro A, Nishimune Y, Morita T. Cell cycle-dependent expression of the mouse Rad51 gene in proliferating cells. Mol Gen Genet 1996;251:1-12.
61. Morrison C, Takeda S. Genetic analysis of homologous DNA recombination in vertebrate somatic cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2000;32:817-831.
62. Latt SA. Sister chromatid exchange formation. Annu Rev Genet 1981;15:11-55.
63. Rouet P, Smih F, Jasin M. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol Cell Biol 1994;14:8096-8106.
64. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Buerstedde JM, Bezzubova O, Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Takata M, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Takeda S. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. Embo J 1998;17:598-608.
65. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Morrison C, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Takata M, Takeda S. Sister chromatid exchanges are mediated by homologous recombination in vertebrate cells. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:5166-5169.
66. Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, et al. Mre11 is essential for the maintenance of chromosomal DNA in vertebrate cells. Embo J 1999;18:6619-6629.
67. Takata M, Sasaki MS, Tachiiri S, Fukushima T, Sonoda E, Schild D, Thompson LH, Takeda S. Chromosome instability and defective recombinational repair in knockout mutants of the five Rad51 paralogs. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:2858-2866.
68. Bezzubova O, Silbergleit A, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Takeda S, Buerstedde JM. Reduced X-ray resistance and homologous recombination frequencies in a RAD54-/- mutant of the chicken DT40 cell line. Cell 1997;89:185-193.
69. Yamashita YM, Okada T, Matsusaka T, Sonoda E, Zhao GY, Araki K, Tateishi S, Yamaizumi M, Takeda S. RAD18 and RAD54 cooperatively contribute to maintenance of genomic stability in vertebrate cells. Embo J 2002;21:5558-5566.
70. Sonoda E, et al. Multiple roles of Rev3, the catalytic subunit of polzeta in maintaining genome stability in vertebrates. Embo J 2003;22:3188-3197.
71. Simpson LJ, Sale JE. Rev1 is essential for DNA damage tolerance and non-templated immunoglobulin gene mutation in a vertebrate cell line. Embo J 2003;22:1654-1664.
72. Okada T, Sonoda E, Yamashita YM, Koyoshi S, Tateishi S, Yamaizumi M, Takata M, Ogawa O, Takeda S. Involvement of vertebrate polkappa in Rad18-independent postreplication repair of UV damage. J Biol Chem 2002;277:48690-48695.
73. Tarsounas M, Davies D, West SC. BRCA2-dependent and independent formation of RAD51 nuclear foci. Oncogene 2003;22:1115-1123.
74. Hickson ID. RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:169-178.
75. Kai M, Wang TS. Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev 2003;17:64-76.
76. Tateishi S, Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Fujimoto S, Inoue H, Yamaizumi M. Enhanced genomic instability and defective postreplication repair in RAD18 knockout mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 2003;23:474-481.
77. Masutani C, Araki M, Yamada A, Kusumoto R, Nogimori T, Maekawa T, Iwai S, Hanaoka F. Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) correcting protein from HeLa cells has a thymine dimer bypass DNA polymerase activity. Embo J 1999;18:3491-3501.
78. Faili A, Aoufouchi S, Flatter E, Gueranger Q, Reynaud CA, Weill JC. Induction of somatic hypermutation in immunoglobulin genes is dependent on DNA polymerase iota. Nature 2002:419:944-947.
79. Schenten D, Gerlach VL, Guo C, Velasco-Miguel S, Hladik CL, White CL, Friedberg EC, Rajewsky K, Esposito G. DNA polymerase kappa deficiency does not affect somatic hypermutation in mice. Eur J Immunol 2002;32:3152-3160.