Ethnic Bias and Fairness in Personnel Selection: Evidence and Consequences

The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 306-328

  Evers, Arne ^a   Nijenhuis, Jan Te ^b   van der Flier, Henk ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Open Unwersiteit   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alternative predictors; Criterion; Results of bias research

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747793521     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781405164221.ch14     Document Type: Chapter

References (118)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council of Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-29.
4. Bartlett, C. J., & O'Leary, B. S. (1969). A differential prediction model to moderate the effects of heterogeneous groups in personnel selection and classification. Personnel Psychology, 22, 1-17.
5. Black, H. (1962). They shall not pass. New York: Random House.
6. Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Potosky, D. (1999). Derivation and implication of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 52, 561-590.
7. Callinan, M., & Robertson, I. T. (2000). Work sample testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 248-260.
8. Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115-124.
9. Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C, Davison, H. K., & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 326-351.
10. De Corte, W. (1999). Weighing job performance predictors to both maximize the quality of the selected workforce and control the level of adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 695-702.
11. Dewberry, C. (2001). Performance disparities between whites and ethnic minorities: Real differences or assessment bias? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 659-673.
12. Dorans, N. J., Schmitt, A. P., & Bleistein, C. A. (1992). The standardization approach to assessing comprehensive differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 309-319.
13. Dubin, J. A., Osburn, H., & Winick, D. M. (1969). Speed and practice: Effects on Negro and white test performances. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15, 19-23.
14. DuBois, C. L. Z., Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1993). Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: Definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 205-211.
15. Duran, R. P. (1983). Hispanics' education and background: Predictors of college achievement. New York: Entrance Examination Board.
16. Eitelberg, M. J., Laurence, J. H., Waters, B. K., & Perelman, L. S. (1984). Screening for service: Aptitude and education criteria for military entry. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
17. Evans, E R., & Reilly, R. R. (1973). A study of test speededness as a potential source of bias in the quantitative score of the Admissions Test for Graduate Study in Business. Research in Higher Education, 1, 173-183.
18. Eysenck, H.J. (1959). Manualfor the Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.
19. Ford, J. K., Kraiger, K., & Schechtman, S. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 330-337.
20. Galton, E (1892). Hereditary genius. London: MacMillan.
21. Goldberg, L. R., Sweeney, D., Merenda, P. E, & Hughes, J. E., Jr. (1998). Demographic variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial status on self-descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 393-103.
22. Gottfredson, L. S. (1988). Reconsidering fairness: A matter of social and ethical priorities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 293-319.
23. Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Where and why g matters: Not a mystery. Human Performance, 15, 25-16.
24. Gross, M. L. (1962). The brain watcher. New York: Random House.
25. Guion, R. M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, and predictionfor personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Hartigan, J. A., & Wigdor, A. K. (Eds.). (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the General Aptitude list Battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Harville, D. L. (1996). Ability test equity in predicting job performance work samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 344-348.
29. Hernnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. York: Free Press.
30. Hough, L. M. (1992). The "big five" personality variables - construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
31. Hough, L. M. (1997). The millennium for personality psychology: New horizons or good old daze. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 233-261.
32. Hough, L. M. (1998). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. In M. Hakel (Ed.), Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating alternatives to traditional tests for selection (pp. 131-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection, and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.
34. Houston, W. M., & Novick, M. R. (1987). Race-based differential prediction in air force technical training programs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 309-320.
35. Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W, Jr. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184-190.
36. Huffcutt, A. I., & Roth, P. L. (1998). Racial group differences in employment interview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 179-189.
37. Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 459-473.
38. Hunter, J. E. (1983). Fairness of the General Aptitude Test Battery: Ability differences and their impact on minority hiring rates (USES Test Research Report No. 46). Washington, DC: US Employment Service, US Department of Labor.
39. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
40. Hunter, J E., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, R. F. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 721-735.
41. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., &Judiesch, M. K. (1990). Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 28-42.
42. Jensen, A. R. (1974). The effect of race of examiner on the mental test scores of white and black pupils. Journal of Educational Measurement, 11, 1-14.
43. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. London: Methuen.
44. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The gfactor: The science of mental ability. London: Praeger.
45. Jones, P. R., & Stangor, C. (2004). The effects of activated stereotypes on stigmatized and non-stigmatized individuals: A meta-analysis of the stereotype threat literature. Unpublished manuscript.
46. Kehoe, J. F. (2002). General mental ability and selection in private sector organizations: A commentary. Human Performance, 15, 97-106.
47. Knapp, R. R. (1960). The effects of time limits on the intelligence test performance of Mexican and American subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 14-20.
48. Kraiger, K., & Ford,J. K. (1990). The relation of job knowledge, job performance, and supervisory ratings as a function of ratee race. Human Performance, 3, 269-279.
49. Landy, F. J., Shankster, L. J., & Kohler, S. S. (1994). Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 261-296.
50. Linn, R. L. (1982). Ability testing: Individual differences, prediction, and differential prediction. In A. K. Wigdor & W. R. Gardner (Eds.), Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies (pp. 335-388). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. Llabre, M. M., & Froman, T. W. (1987). Allocation of time to test items: A study of ethnic differences. Journal of Experimental Education, 55, 137-140.
52. Llabre, M. M., & Froman, T. W. (1988). Allocation of time and item performance in Hispanic and Anglo examinees (Final report). Institute for Student Assessment and Evaluation, University of Florida.
53. Mayer, D. M., & Hanges, P.J. (2003). Understanding the stereotype threat effect with "culture-free" tests: An examination of its mediators and measurement. Human Performance, 16, 207-230.
54. McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-616.
55. McFarland, L. A., Lev-Arey, D. M., & Ziegert, J. C. (2003). An examination of stereotype threat in a motivational context. Human Performance, 16, 181-205.
56. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
57. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G, Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W, Brody, N., Ceci, S.J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
58. Nguyen, H.-H. D., O'Neal, A., & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Relating test-taking attitudes and skills and stereotype threat effects to the racial gap in cognitive ability test performance. Human Performance, 16, 261-293.
59. O'Brien, L. T, & Crandall, C. S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 782-789.
60. Ones, D. S., & Anderson, N. (2002). Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 255-276.
61. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, age and race differences on overt integrity tests: Analyses across four large-scale applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35-12.
62. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C, & Schmidt, E L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
63. Pearson, B. Z. (1993). Predictive validity of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) for Hispanic bilingual students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 342-356.
64. Pennock-Roman, M. (1992). Interpreting test performance in selective admissions for Hispanic students. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), Psychological testing of Hispanics. Washington, DC: APA.
65. Peterson, N. G., Hough, L. M., Dunnette, M. D., Rosse, R. L., Houston, J. S., Toquam, J. L., et al. (1990). Project A: Specification of the predictor domain and development of new selection/classification tests. Personnel Psychology, 43, 247-276.
66. Phillips, L. H., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1995). Impulsivity and speed-accuracy strategies in intelligence test performance. Intelligence, 21, 13-29.
67. Ployhart, R. E., Ziegert, J. C, & McFarland, L. A. (2003). Understanding racial differences on cognitive ability tests in selection contexts: An integration of stereotype threat and applicant reactions research. Human Performance, 16, 231-259.
68. Pulakos, E. D, & Schmitt, N. (1996). An evaluation of two strategies for reducing adverse impact and their effects on criterion-related validity. Human Performance, 9, 241-258.
69. Ramos, R. A. (1981). Employment battery performance of Hispanic applicants as a function of English or Spanish test instructions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 291-295.
70. Reynolds, C. R., & Kaiser, S. M. (1990). Bias in assessment of aptitude. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and (pp. 611-653). New York: Guilford.
71. Robertson, I. T, & Kandola, R. S. (1982). Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and applicant reaction. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 171-183.
72. Roth, P. L., Bevier, C. A., Bobko, P., Switzer, F. S., III, & Tyler, P. (2001). Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 54, 297-330.
73. Roth, P. L., Huffcutt, A. I., & Bobko, P. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of group performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694-706.
74. Ryan, A. M., Ployhart, R. E., & Friedel, L. A. (1998). Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary note. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 298-307.
75. Saad, S., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). Investigating differential prediction by gender in employment-oriented personality measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 667-674.
76. Sackett, P. R. (2003). Stereotype threat in applied selection settings: A commentary. Human Performance, 16, 295-309.
77. Sackett, P. R., & DuBois, C. L. Z. (1991). Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation: Challenging meta-analytic conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 873-877.
78. Sackett, P. R., & Ellingson, J. E. (1997). The effects of forming multi-predictor composites on group differences and adverse impact. Personnel Psychology, 50, 707-721.
79. Sackett, P. R., Hardison, C. M., & Cullen, M. J. (in press). On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for Black-White differences on cognitive tests. Journal of Applied Psychology.
80. Sackett, P. R., Laczo, R. M., & Lippe, Z. P. (2003). Differential prediction and the use of multiple predictors: The omitted variables problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1046-1056.
81. Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education. American Psychologist, 56, 302-318.
82. Salgado, J. E (1997). The Five Factor Model of Personality and Job Performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-13.
83. Salgado, J. E, & Anderson, N. (2003). Validity generalization of GMA tests across countries in the European Community. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 1-17.
84. Salgado, J. E, Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C, & De Eruyt, F. (2003). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities as predictors of work behaviours: A European contribution and comparison with American findings. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.
85. Salgado, J. E, & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the selection interview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 299-324.
86. Schmidt, F. L. (1988). The problem of group differences in ability test scores in employment selection. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 272-292.
87. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
88. Schmidt, F. L. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187-210.
89. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
90. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162-173.
91. Schmidt, F. L., Pearlman, K., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). The validity and fairness of employment and educational tests for Hispanic Americans: A review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 33, 705-724.
92. Schmitt, A. P., & Dorans, N.J. (1990). Differential Item Functioning for minority examinees on the SAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 67-81.
93. Schmitt, N, Clause, C. S., & Pulakos, E. D. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job-relevant constructs. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11, 115-139.
94. Schmitt, N., Rogers, W, Chan, D., Sheppard, L., &Jennings, D. (1997). Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 719-730.
95. Scott, N., & Anderson, N. (2003, May). Ethnk and gender differences in GMA test scores: Findings from the UK. Paper presented at the EAWOP Conference, Lisbon.
96. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (1987). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures. College Park, MD: SIOP.
97. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
98. Steele, C. M., & Aronson,J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
99. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J, & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440.
100. Strieker, L.J. (1998). Inquiring about examinees' ethnicity and sex: Effects on AP Calculus AB Examination (College Board Rep. No. 98-1; ETS Research Rep. No. 98-5). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
101. Strieker, L. J, & Ward, W. C. (1998). Inquiring about examinees' ethnicity and sex: Effects on Computerized Placement Tests Performance (College Board Rep. No. 98-2; ETS Research Rep. No. 98-9). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
102. Tellegen, B. (1968). Over rigiditeit [On rigidity]. Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Avanti.
103. te Nijenhuis, J., de Jong, M. J., Evers, A., & van der Flier, H. (2004). Are cognitive differences between immigrant and majority groups diminishing? European Journal of Personality, 18, 405-134.
104. te Nijenhuis, J, Evers, A., & Mur, J. P. (2000). Validity of the Differential Aptitude Test for immigrant children. Educational Psychology, 20, 99-115.
105. te Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (1999). Bias research in The Netherlands: Review and implications. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 165-175.
106. te Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (2000). Differential prediction of immigrant versus majority group training performance using cognitive ability and personality measures? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 54-60.
107. te Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (2003). Immigrant-majority group differences in cognitive performance: Jensen effects, cultural effects, or both. Intelligence, 31, 443-59.
108. te Nijenhuis, J., van der Flier, H., & van Leeuwen, L. (1997). Comparability of personality test scores for immigrants and majority group members: Some Dutch findings. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 849-859.
109. te Nijenhuis, J., van der Flier, H., & van Leeuwen, L. (2003). The use of a test for neuroticism, extra-version, and rigidity for Dutch immigrant job-applicants. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 630-647.
110. van den Berg, R. H. (2001). Psychohgisch onderzoek in een multkulturele samenleving: Psychologische interview- enfunctioneringsbeoordelingen [Psychological research in a multicultural society: Psychological tests, interview ratings and job proficiency assessment]. Amsterdam: NOA.
111. van der Flier, H., & Drenth, P.J. D. (1980). Fair selection and comparability of test scores. In L.J. Th. van der Kamp, W. E Langerak & D. N. M. de Gruijter (Eds.), Psychometricsfor educational debates (pp. 85-101). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
112. van Leest, P. F. (1997). Persoonlijkheidsmeting bij alhehtonen [Assessment of personality for ethnic minorities]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
113. Waldman, D. A., & Avolio, B.J. (1991). Race effects in performance evaluations: Controlling for ability, education, and experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 897-901.
114. Wiesner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275-290.
115. Wigdor, A. K., & Garner, W. R. (Eds.). (1982). Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies. Washington DC: National Academy Press
116. Wild, C. L., Durso, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Effect of increased test-taking time on test scores by ethnic group, years out of school, and sex. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 19-28.
117. Wilson, K. M. (1990). Population differences in speed versus level of GRE reading comprehension: An study (GRE Report No. 84-09). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
118. Young, J. W. (1994). Differential prediction of college grades by gender and ethnicity: A replication study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 1022-1029.