Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 255-276

  Ones, Deniz S ^a   Anderson, Neil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036391587     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/096317902320369703     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Anderson, N., & Herriot, P. (Eds) (1997). International handbook of selection and assessment. Chichester: John Wiley.
2. Anderson, N., & Ones, D. S. (1988). Psychometric properties of three popular five factor model (FFM) measures of work-related personality: Implications for selection and assessment. Paper presented at the European Congress of Psychology, Surrey, UK.
3. Anderson, N., & Ones, D. S. (in press). The construct validity of three entry level personality inventories used in the UK: A cautionary multiple-inventory investigation. European Journal of Personality.
4. Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.) (2001). Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vols I & II). London/New York: Sage.
5. Barrett, P., & Eysenck, S. (1984). The assessment of personality factors across 25 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 615-632.
6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
7. Campbell, J. P. (1996). Group differences and personnel decisions: Validity, fairness, and affirmative action. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 122-158.
8. Cascio, W. F. (1991). Applied psychology in personnel management (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Cellar, D. F., Miller, M. L., Doverspike, D. D., & Klawsky, J. D. (1996). Comparison of factor structures and criterion-related validity coefficients for two measures of personality based on the five factor model Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 694-704.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Standard power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Commission for Racial Equality (1984). Race relations code of practice for the elimination of racial discrimination and the promotion of good race relations in employment. London: CRE.
12. Commission for Racial Equality (1991). A measure of equality: Monitoring and achieving racial equality in employment. London: CRE.
13. Commission for Racial Equality (1998). We regret to inform you. London: CRE.
14. Cook, M. (Ed.) (1998). Personnel selection: Adding value through people (3rd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley.
15. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. M. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
16. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
17. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
19. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429-456.
20. Feltham, R., & Woods, J. (1995). Manual and user guide for the Business Personality Indicator. Windsor, UK: ASE.
21. Gandy, J., Dye, D., & MacLane, C. (1996). Federal government selection: The individual achievement record. In G. Stokes, M. Mumford, & W. Owens (Eds.), Btodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (pp. 275-310). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
22. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternate 'description of personality', The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.
23. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
24. Goldberg, L. R., Sweeney, D., Merenda, P. F., & Hughes, J. E., Jr. (1998). Demographic variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial status on self-descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(3), 393-403.
25. Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.
26. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
28. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Payne, R. L. (1998). Graduate selection in three European countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 359-365.
30. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1995). Hogan Personality Inventory Manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
31. Hough, L. M. (1998). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. In M. Hakel (Ed.), Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating alternatives to traditional testing for selection (pp. 131-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
32. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
33. Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection, and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.
34. Huffcutt, A., & Roth, P. (1998). Racial group differences in interview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 179-189.
35. Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470-500.
36. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37. Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct validity evidence for integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
38. Ones, D. S., & Anderson, N. (1999). Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales: Some data from the UK. Paper presented at the 14th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
39. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C, (1998a). Integrity testing in organizations. In R. W. Griffin, A. O'Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations. Vol. 2. Nonviolent behaviors in organizations, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998b). Gender, age and race differences on overt integrity tests: Analyses across four large-scale applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35-42.
41. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31-40.
42. Ones, D. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (1995). Convergence among three personality inventories measuring the Big Five. Paper presented at the 103rd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
43. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
44. Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H. & Page, R. (1999). An International look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359-392.
45. Sackett, P. R., & Ellingson, J. E. (1997). The effects of forming multi-redictor composites on group differences and adverse impact. Personnel Psychology, 50, 707-721.
46. Sackett, P. R., & Roth, L. (1996). Multi-stage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiring. Personnel Psychology, 49, 549-572.
47. Sackett, P. R., & Wilk, S. L. (1994). Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. American Psychologist, 49(11), 929-954.
48. Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
49. Salgado, J. F., Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2001). Predictors used for personnel selection: an overview of constructs, methods and techniques. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. I). London/New York: Sage.
50. Schmidt, F. L., Ones, D. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 627-670.
51. Shackleton, V. J., & Newell, S. (1994). European management selection methods: A comparison of five countries. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 91-102.
52. SHL (1999). OPQ32 manual and user's guide. Surrey, UK: SHL Group.
53. Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.