Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at the profile level

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 7, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Dong, Qiwen W ^a   Wang, Xiaolong L ^a   Lin, Lei ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE MODELING; DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING; EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION; MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS; PROBABILITY THRESHOLD; PROTEIN ENERGETICS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION; STATISTICAL POTENTIAL;

AMINO ACIDS; BINARY SEQUENCES; DIHEDRAL ANGLE; PROTEINS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN; PEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ATOM; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGY; BIOPHYSICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEPTIDES; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33747135021     PISSN: 14712105     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-324     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Sippl MJ: Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5(2):229-235.
2. Mirny L, Shakhnovich E: How to derive a protein folding potential?A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996, 264(5):1164-1179.
3. Miyazawa S, Jernigan R: An empirical energy potential with a reference state for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 1999, 36(3):357-369.
4. Lazaridis T, Karplus M: Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000, 10(2):139-145.
5. Fujitsuka Y, Takada S, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG: Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding. Proteins 2004, 54(1):88-103.
6. Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M: All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem 1998, 102(18):3586-3617.
7. Lii JH, Allinger NL: Directional Hydrogen Bonding in the MM3 Force Field. II. J Comp Chem 1998, 19(9):1001-1016.
8. Fang Q, Shortle D: Enhanced sampling near the native conformation using statistical potentials for local side-chain and backbone interactions. Proteins 2005, 60(1):97-102.
9. Fang Q, Shortle D: A consistent set of statistical potentials for quantifying local side-chain and backbone interactions. Proteins 2005, 60(1):90-96.
10. Loose C, Klepeis JL, Floudas CA: A new pairwise folding potential based on improved decoy generation and side-chain packing. Proteins 2004, 54(2):303-314.
11. Melo F, Sanchez R, Sali A: Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci 2002, 11(2):430-448.
12. Duan Y, Kollman P: Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998, 282(5389):740-744.
13. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg DA: a method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991, 253(5016):164-170.
14. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D: Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997, 268(1):209-225.
15. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T: Critical Assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) - Round V. Proteins 2003, 53(Suppl 6):334-339.
16. Melo F, Feytmans E: Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. J Mol Biol 1998, 277(5):1141-1152.
17. Gilis D, Rooman M: Identification and ab initio simulations of early folding units in proteins. Proteins 2001, 42(2):164-176.
18. Zhou H, Zhou Y: Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins 2004, 55(4):1005-1013.
19. Sippl MJ: Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990, 213(4):859-883.
20. Sippl MJ: Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1993, 7(4):473-501.
21. Samudrala R, Moult J: An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998, 275(5):895-916.
22. Melo F, Feytmans E: Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J Mol Biol 1997, 267(1):207-222.
23. Summa CM, Levitt M, Degrado WF: An atomic environment potential for use in protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 2005, 352(4):986-1001.
24. Qiu J, Elber R: Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures. Proteins 2005, 61(1):44-55.
25. Lu H, Skolnick J: A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001, 44(3):223-232.
26. Berrera M, Molinari H, Fogolari F: Amino acid empirical contact energy definitions for fold recognition in the space of contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:8.
27. Alexandrov NN, Nussinov R, Zimmer RM: Fast protein fold recognition via sequence to structure alignment and capacity: London, UK.; 1996:53-72.
28. Jones DT: GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999, 287(4):797-815.
29. Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU: VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol 1997, 277:396-404.
30. Kunin V, A. OC: Clustering the annotation space of proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:24.
31. Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ: Protein sequence randomization: efficient estimation of protein stability using knowledge-based potentials. J Mol Biol 2005, 345(5):1199-1212.
32. Chiu TL, Goldstein RA: How to generate improved potentials for protein tertiary structure prediction: a lattice model study. Proteins 2000, 41(2):157-163.
33. Yang WY, Pitera JW, Swope WC, Gruebele M: Heterogeneous folding of the trpzip hairpin: full atom simulation and experiment. J Mol Biol 2004, 336(1):241-251.
34. Sander O, Sommer I, Lengauer T: Local protein structure prediction using discriminative models. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:14.
35. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped Blast and Psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 1997, 25(17):3389-3402.
36. Dowd SE, Zaragoza J, Rodriguez JR, Oliver MJ, Payton PR: Windows.NET Network Distributed Basic Local Alignment Search Toolkit (W.ND-BLAST). BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:93.
37. Tsai J, Bonneau R, Morozov AV, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D: An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003, 53(1):76-87.
38. Braxenthaler M, Samudrala R, Pedersen J, Luo R, Milash B, Moult J: PROSTAR: The protein potential test site. [http://prostar.carb.nist.gov].
39. Holm L, Sander C: Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference. J Mol Biol 1992, 225(1):93-105.
40. Pedersen JT, Moult J: Folding simulation with genetic algorithms and a detailed molecular description. J Mol Biol 1997, 269(2):240-259.
41. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE: The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28(1):235-242.
42. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, Zhou Y: An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci 2004, 13(2):400-411.
43. Park B, Levitt M: Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996, 258(2):367-392.
44. Keasar C, Levitt M: A novel approach to decoy set generation: designing a physical energy function having local minima with native structure characteristics. J Mol Biol 2003, 329(1):159-174.
45. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D: Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999, 37(Suppl 3):171-176.
46. Samudrala R, Xia Y, Levitt M, Huang ES: A combined approach for ab initio construction of low resolution protein tertiary structures from sequence. Pac Symp Biocomput 1999:505-516.
47. Wang K, Fain B, Levitt M, Samudrala R: Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct Biol 2004, 4(1):8.
48. Lin K, Simossis VA, Taylor WR, Heringa J: A simple and fast secondary structure prediction method using hidden neural networks. BioInformatics 2005, 21(2):152-159.
49. Cao Y, Liu S, Zhang L, Qin J, Wang J, Tang K: Prediction of protein structural class with Rough Sets. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:20.
50. Anand B, Gowri VS, Srinivasan N: Use of multiple profiles corresponding to a sequence alignment enables effective detection of remote homologues. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(12):2821-2826.
51. Casbon JA, Saqi MA: On single and multiple models of protein families for the detection of remote sequence relationships. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:48.
52. Kasson PM, Huppa JB, Davis MM, Brunger AT: A hybrid machine-learning approach for segmentation of protein localization data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(19):3778-3786.
53. Lei Z, Dai Y: An SVM-based system for predicting protein subnuclear localizations. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:291.
54. Sim J, Kim SY, Lee J: PPRODO: prediction of protein domain boundaries using neural networks. Proteins 2005, 59(3):627-632.
55. Zhou H, Zhou Y: Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 2005, 58(2):321-328.
56. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Skorodumov C, Abagyan R: Optimal docking area: a new method for predicting protein-protein interaction sites. Proteins 2005, 58(1):134-143.
57. Thibert B, Bredesen DE, Del Rio G: Improved prediction of critical residues for protein function based on network and phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(1):213.
58. Mittelman D, Sadreyev R, Grishin N: Probabilistic scoring measures for profile-profile comparison yield more accurate short seed alignments. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(12):1531-1539.
59. Ohlson T, Wallner B, Elofsson A: Profile-profile methods provide improved fold-recognition: a study of different profile-profile alignment methods. Proteins 2004, 57(1):188-197.
60. Mizuguchi K, Deane CM, Blundell TL, Overington JP: HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci 1998, 7(11):2469-2471.
61. Fogolari F, Tosatto SC, Colombo G: A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:301.
62. Sali A, Blundell TL: Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993, 234(3):779-815.
63. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJP, Chothia C, Murzi AG: SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Research 2004, 32(database issue):D226-D229.
64. Chandonia JM, Hon G, Walker NS, Conte LL, Koehl P, Levitt M, Brenner SE: The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004. Nucleic acids research 2004, 32(database issue): 189-192.
65. Wang G, Dunbrack RLJ: PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(12):1589-1591.
66. Holm L, Sander C: Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections. Bioinformatics 1998, 14(5):423-429.
67. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG: Position-based sequence weights. J Mol Biol 1994, 243(4):574-578.
68. Schneider TS, Stormo GD, Gold L, Ehrenfeucht A: Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences. J Mol Biol 1986, 188(3):415-431.
69. Tatusov RL, Altschul SF, Koonin EV: Detection of conserved segments in proteins: iterative scanning of sequence databases with alignment blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91(25):12091-12095.
70. Brown M, Hughey R, Krogh A, Mian IS, Sjölander K, Haussler D: Dirichlet Mixture priors to derive hidden Markov models for protein families: Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press; 1993:47-55.
71. Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K: Pattern recognition. Academic Press.; 1999.