A consistent set of statistical potentials for quantifying local side-chain and backbone interactions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 90-96

  Fang, Qiaojun ^a   Shortle, David ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Boltzmann hypothesis; Fragment threading; Free energy; Knowledge based potentials; Side chain backbone interaction; Side chain side chain interaction

Indexed keywords

AMIDE; AMINO ACID; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYPOTHESIS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON TRANSPORT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 19544371352     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20482     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Dobson CM, Evans PA, Radford SE. Understanding how proteins fold: the lysozyme story so far. Trends Biochem Sci 1994;19:31-37.
2. Honig B, Cohen FE. Adding backbone to protein folding: why proteins are polypeptides. Fold Des 1996;1:R17-R20.
3. Shortle DR. Structural analysis of non-native states of proteins by NMR methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:24-30.
4. Shortle D, Ackerman MS. Persistence of native-like topology in a denatured protein in 8 M urea. Science 2001;293:487-489.
5. Ohnishi S, Lee AL, Edgell MH, Shortle D. Direct demonstration of structural similarity between native and denatured eglin C. Biochemistry 2004;43:4064-4070.
6. Ackerman MS, Shortle D. Robustness of the long-range structure in denatured staphylococcal nuclease to changes in amino acid sequence. Biochemistry 2002;41:13791-13797.
7. Levinthal C. Are there pathways for protein folding? J Chim Phys 1968;65:44-45.
8. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223-230.
9. Fang Q, Shortle D. Prediction of protein structure by emphasizing local side-chain/backbone interactions in ensembles of turn fragments. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):486-490.
10. Pohl FM. Empirical protein energy maps. Nat New Biol 1971;234: 277-279.
11. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-950.
12. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
13. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force: an approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
14. Kocher JP, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1598-1613.
15. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
16. Moult J. Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:194-199.
17. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
18. Chou PY, Fasman GD. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry 1974;13:211-222.
19. Shortle D. Propensities, probabilities, and the Boltzmann hypothesis. Protein Sci 2003;12:1298-1302.
20. Shortle D. Composites of local structure propensities: evidence for local encoding of long-range structure. Protein Sci 2002;11:18-26.
21. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
22. Branden C, Tooze J. Introduction to protein structure. New York: Garland; 1999. 410 p.
23. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 1993;16:92-112.
24. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589-1591.
25. Morris AL, MacArthur MW, Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates. Proteins 1992; 12:345-364.
26. Spronk CA, Linge JP, Hilbers CW, Vuister GW. Improving the quality of protein structures derived by NMR spectroscopy. J Biomol NMR 2002;22:281-289.
27. Kuszewski J, Clore GM. Sources of and solutions to problems in the refinement of protein NMR structures against torsion angle potentials of mean force. J Magn Reson 2000;146:249-254.
28. Meiler J, Baker D. Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:15404-15409.
29. Roterman IK, Lambert MH, Gibson KD, Scheraga HA. A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides: II. Phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N′-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1989;7:421-453.
30. Lo Conte L, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:264-267.
31. Tsai J, Bonneau R, Morozov AV, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003;53:76-87.