A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Fogolari, Federico ^a   Tosatto, Silvio C E ^b   Colombo, Giorgio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COVALENT STRUCTURES; ENERGY MINIMIZATION; GENERALIZED BORN SURFACE AREAS (GBSA); MODEL QUALITY ESTIMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS TRAJECTORIES; POISSON BOLTZMANN SURFACE AREAS (PBSA); SECONDARY STRUCTURE ELEMENTS;

ANIMALS; ESTIMATION; FREE ENERGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

SOLVENT; VILLIN; ACTIN BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; SIMULATION; SOLVATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEREOSPECIFICITY; THERMOSTABILITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATION; ENTROPY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; GENETICS; HEAT; HYDROGEN BOND; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DENATURATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ENTROPY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HOT TEMPERATURE; HYDROGEN BONDING; MICROFILAMENT PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 29244479220     PISSN: 14712105     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-301     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Valencia A: Protein refinement: a new challenge for CASP in its 10th anniversary. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:277.
2. Hao M, Scheraga H: Molecular mechanisms for cooperative folding of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 277:973-983.
3. Lazaridis T, Karplus M: Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 1999, 288:477-87.
4. Petrey D, Honig B: Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models. Protein Sci 2000, 9:2181-2191.
5. Fogolari F, Tosatto S: Application of MM/PBSA colony free energy to loop decoy discrimination: towards correlation between energy and root mean square deviation. Prot. Sci. 2005, 14:889-901.
6. Sippl M: Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7:473-501.
7. Samudrala R, Moult J: An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998, 275:895-916.
8. Lu H, Skolnick J: A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001, 44:223-232.
9. Zhou H, Zhou Y: Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 2002, 11:2714-2726.
10. Berrera M, Molinari H, Fogolari F: Amino acid empirical contact energy definitions for fold recognition in the space of contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:8.
11. Wang K, Fain B, Levitt M, Samudrala R: Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct. Biol. 2004, 4:8.
12. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, Zhou Y: An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci. 2004, 13:400-411.
13. Samudrala R, Levitt M: Decoys 'R' us: a database of incorrect protein conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci. 2000, 9:1399-1401.
14. Duan Y, Kollman P: Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998, 282:740-744.
15. Mori GD, Micheletti C, Colombo G: All-atom folding simulations of the Villin headpiece from stochastically-selected coarse-grained structures. J Phys Chem B 2004, 12267-12270:33.
16. Mori GD, Colombo G, Micheletti C: Study of the Villin headpiece folding dynamics by combining coarse-grained Monte Carlo evolution and all-atom molecular dynamics. Proteins 2005, 459-471:58.
17. Zagrovic B, Snow C, Shirts M, Pande V: Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. J Mol Biol 2002, 323:927-937.
18. Pande V, Baker I, Chapman J, Elmer S, Khaliq S, Rhee Y, Shirts M, Snow C, sorin E, Zagrovic B: Atomistic protein folding simulation on the submillisecond time scale using worldwide distributed computing. Biopolymers 2003, 68:91-109.
19. Ripoll D, Vila J, Scheraga, H: Folding of the villin headpiece subdomain from random structures. Analysis of the charge distribution as a function of pH. J Mol Biol 2004, 339:915-925.
20. Herges T, Wenzel W: Free energy landscape of the villin headpiece in an all-atom force field. Structure 2005, 13:661-668.
21. α RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and s15. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123:1040-1046.
22. Chiu T, Kubelka J, Herbst-Irmer R, Eaton W, Hofrichter J, Davies D: High-resolution X-Ray crystal structure of the villin headpiece subdomain, an ultrafast folding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005, 102:7517-7522.
23. Laskowski R, MacArthur M, Moss D, Thornton J: PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1993, 26:283-291.
24. Shortle D: Composites of local structure propensities: evidence for local encoding of long range structure. Protein Sci. 2002, 11:18-26.
25. Fang Q, Shortle D: A consistent set of statistical potentials for quantifying local side-chain and backbone interactions. Proteins 2005, 60:90-96.
26. Tosatto S: The Victor/FRST Function for Model Quality Estimation. J. Comput. Biol. 2005. [In press.].
27. Xiang Z, Soto SC, Honig B: Evaluating free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002, 99:7432-7437.
28. Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP: The missing term in effective pair potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91:6269-6271.
29. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L: Particle Mesh Ewald. An N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. Journal of Chemical Physics 1993, 98:10089-10092.
30. van Gunsteren WF, Daura X, Mark AE: GROMOS Force Field. Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry 1998, 2:1211-1216.
31. van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA, Hünenberger PH, Krüger P, Mark AE, Scott WRP, Tironi IG: Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide. vdf Hochschulverlag, ETH Zürich, Switzerland 1996.
32. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Di Nola A, Haak JR: Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81:3684.
33. Hess B, Bekker H, Fraaije JGEM, Berendsen HJC: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comp. Chem. 1997, 18:1463-1472.
34. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA: SETTLE: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithms for rigid water models. J. Comp. Chem. 1992, 13:952-962.
35. van der Spoel D, van Drunen R, Berendsen HJC: GRoningen MAchine for Chemical Simulations. Department of Biophysical Chemistry, BIOSON Research Institute, Nijenborgh 4 NL-9717 AG Groningen 1994. [E-mail to gromacsγhem.rug.nl].
36. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M: CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy Minimization and Dynamics Calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4:187-217.
37. MacKerell ADJ, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RLJ, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WEI, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M: All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics Studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102:3586-3616.
38. Qiu D, Shenkin P, Hollinger F, Still W: The GB/SA Continuum Model for Solvation. A Fast Analytical Method for the Calculation of Approximate Born Radii. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101:3005-3014.
39. Jones DT: GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 287:797-815.
40. Fogolari F, Moroni E, Wojciechowski M, Baginski M, Ragona L, Molinari H: MM/PBSA analysis of molecular dynamics simulations of bovine b-lactoglobulin: free energy gradients in conformational transitions? Proteins 2005, 59:91-103.
41. Fogolari F, Brigo A, Molinari H: The Poisson-Boltzmann equation for biomolecular electrostatics: a tool for structural biology. J. Mol. Recogn. 2002, 15:377-392.
42. Nicholls A, Sharp KA, Honig B: Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 1991, 11:281-296.
43. Fogolari F, Brigo A, Molinari H: Protocol for MM/PBSA molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Biophys. J. 2003, 85:159-166.
44. Sanner M, Spehner JC, Olson A: Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 1996, 38:305-320.
45. Madura JD, Davis ME, Gilson MK, Wade R, Luty BA, McCammon JA: Biological applications of electrostatics calculations and Brownian dynamics simulations. Rev. Comp. Chem. 1994, 5:229-267.
46. Madura JD, Briggs JM, Wade R, Davis ME, Luty BA, Ilin A, Antosiewicz JA, Gilson MK, Bagheri B, Ridgway Scott L, McCammon JA: Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution: simulations with the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics program. Comput. Commun. Phys. 1995, 91:57-95.
47. Fogolari F, Zuccato P, Esposito G, Viglino P: Biomolecular electrostatics with the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Biophys. J. 1999, 76:1-16.
48. Fogolari F, Esposito G, Viglino P, Molinari H: Molecular mechanics and dynamics of biomolecules using a solvent continuum model. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22:1830-1842.