Comparing Virtual Teams to Traditional Teams: An Identification of New Research Opportunities

Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management

Volumn 25, Issue , 2006, Pages 181-215

  Webster, Jane ^a   Staples, D Sandy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744968661     PISSN: 07427301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-7301(06)25005-9     Document Type: Review

References (147)

1. Acar, F. P. (2004). Diversity, conflict, and leadership in project teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
2. Ahuja M.K., and Carley K.M. Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization Science 10 (1999) 741-757
3. Ahuja M.K., Galletta D.F., and Carley K.M. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science 49 (1999) 21-38
4. Alge B., Ballinger G.A., and Green S.G. Remote control: Predictors of electronic monitoring intensity and secrecy. Personnel Psychology 57 (2004) 377-410
5. Anderson, W., & Hiltz, S. (2001). Culturally heterogeneous vs. culturally homogeneous groups in distributed group support systems: Effects on group process and consensus. In: R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HI, USA.
6. Armstrong D.J., and Cole P. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed work (2002), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 167-186
7. Balthazard, P. E., Potter, R. E., & Warren, J. (2002). The effects of extraversion and expertise on virtual team interaction and performance. In: R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HI, USA.
8. Bélanger F., Watson-Manheim M.B., and Jordan D.H. Aligning IS research and practice: A research agenda for virtual work. Information Resources Management Journal 15 (2002) 48-70
9. Beranek, P. (2000). The impacts of relational and trust development training on virtual teams: An exploratory investigation. In: R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii international conference on system science, HI, USA.
10. Berdahl J., and Craig K. Equality of participation and influences in groups: The effects of communication medium and sex composition. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4 (1996) 179-201
11. Bettenhausen K.L. Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management 17 (1991) 345-381
12. Beyerlein M., Johnson D., and Beyerlein S. Virtual teams (2001), Elsevier, Oxford, UK
13. Bhappu, A. D., & Giambatista, R. C. (2004). Using communication technology to enhance knowledge exchange and decision-making in diverse groups. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
14. Bordia P., DiFonzo N., and Chang A. Rumor as group problem solving: Development patterns in informal computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research 30 (1999) 8-28
15. Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., & Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In: D. Wixon (Ed.), Proceedings of CHI 2002, 4, Minneapolis, MN (pp. 135-140).
16. Boutellier R., Gassman O., Macho H., and Roux M. Management of dispersed product development teams. R&D Management 28 (1998) 13-25
17. Burke K., Aytes K., and Chidambaram L. Media effects on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups. Information Technology & People 14 (2001) 122-141
18. Burke K., Aytes K., Chidambaram L., and Johnson J. A study of partially distributed work groups: The impact of media, location, and time on perceptions and performance. Small Group Research 30 (1999) 453-490
19. Carte T., and Chidambaram L. A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (2004) 448-471
20. Cascio W.F. Managing a virtual workplace. The Academy of Management Executive 14 (2000) 81-90
21. Chidambaram L., and Jones B. Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quarterly 17 (1993) 465-491
22. Cohen S.G. Designing effective self-managing work teams. In: Beyerlein M.M., Johnson D.A., and Beyerlein S.T. (Eds). Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams. Series of self-managed work teams Vol. 1 (1994), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT
23. Cohen S.G., and Bailey D.E. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management 23 (1997) 239-290
24. Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (2003). Putting the team back in virtual teams. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the society for industrial/organizational psychology, Orlando, FL.
25. Colquitt J.A., Hollenbeck J.R., Ilgen D.R., LePine J.A., and Sheppard L. Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: The moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002) 402-410
26. Costa P.T., and McCrae R.R. From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (1988) 258-265
27. Cramton C.D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science 12 (2001) 346-371
28. Crisp, C. B. (2002). Control enactment in global virtual teams. Paper presented at the 2002 Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, CO.
29. Cummings J.N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science 50 (2004) 352-364
30. Cummings, J. N. (2006). Leading groups from a distance. In: S. Weisband (Ed.), Leadership at a distance: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (in press).
31. Daft R.L., and Lengel R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32 (1986) 554-571
32. Daly B.L. The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management, and Information Technology 3 (1993) 1-22
33. DeSanctis G., Wright M., and Jiang L. Building a global learning community. Communications of the ACM 44 (2001) 80-82
34. Dooley R.S., and Fryxell G.E. Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management Journal 42 (1999) 389-402
35. Dube L., and Pare G. The multi-faceted nature of virtual teams. In: Pauleen D. (Ed). Virtual teams: Projects, protocols and processes (2004), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA 1-39
36. El-Shinnawy M., and Vinze A.S. Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings. MIS Quarterly 22 (1998) 165-198
37. Espinosa A., Cadiz J., Rico-Guiterrez J., Kraut R., Scherlis W., and Lautenbacher G. Coming to the wrong decision quickly: Why awareness tools must be matched with appropriate tasks. CHI Letters 2 1 (2000) 392-399
38. Espinosa J.A., Cummings J.N., Wilson J.M., and Pearce B.M. Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (2003) 157-190
39. Finholt T.A., Sproull L., and Kiesler S. Outsiders on the inside: Sharing know-how across space and time. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed work (2002), MIT Press, London, UK
40. Fiol, C. M., & O'Connor, E. J. (2002). Identification in virtual teams: From imported to homegrown we-ness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.
41. Furst S., Blackburn R., and Rosen B. Virtual team effectiveness: A proposed research agenda. Information Systems Journal 9 (1999) 249-269
42. Furst S.A., Reeves M., Rosen B., and Blackburn R.S. Managing the life cycle of virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive 18 (2004) 6-20
43. Gallupe R.B., and McKeen J.D. Enhancing computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face versus remote meetings. Information & Management 18 (1990) 1-13
44. Galvin, J. E., Ahuja, M. K., & Agarwal, R. (2000). Dispositional and situational influences on trust behaviour in virtual teams. Working Paper. Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
45. Galvin, J. E., McKnight, D. H., & Ahuja, M. K. (2001). Does experience counteract the effects of disposition - and institution-based trust on project team cooperation? A cross-disciplinary model. Working Paper. Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
46. Gibson, C., & Cohen, S. (2002). Is there anybody out there? The impact of virtuality on individual psychological states and team enabling conditions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.
47. Godar S., and Ferris P. Virtual & collaborative teams: Process, technologies, & practice (2004), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA
48. Graveline, A., Geisler, C., & Danchak, M. (2000). Teaming together apart: Emerging patterns of media use in collaboration at a distance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international professional communication conference, Cambridge, MA (pp. 381-393).
49. Griffith T.L., and Neale M.A. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. In: Sutton R.I., and Staw B.M. (Eds). Research in organizational behavior (2001), JAI Press, Stamford, CT
50. Griffith T.L., Sawyer J.E., and Neale M.A. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle in organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly 27 (2003) 265-287
51. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In: M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
52. Hambrick D.C., Canney Davison S., Snell S.A., and Snow C.C. When groups consist of multiple nationalities: Towards a new understanding of the implications. Organization Studies 19 (1998) 181-205
53. Hause M., Last M., Almstrum V., and Woodroffe M. Interaction factors in software development performance in distributed student teams in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 33 3 (2001) 69-72
54. Hertel G., Konradt U., and Orlikowski B. Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 13 (2004) 1-28
55. Hightower R.T., Sayeed L., Warkentin M.E., and McHaney R. Information exchange in virtual work groups. In: Igbaria M., and Tan M. (Eds). The virtual workplace (1998), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA 199-216
56. Hinds P.J., and Bailey D.E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science 14 (2003) 615-632
57. Hinds P., and Kiesler S. Distributed work (2002), MIT Press, London, UK
58. Hofman, D. A., & Jones. L. M. (2003). Leadership, normative behavior and performance: The role of collective personality. Working Paper. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
59. Hofner Saphiere D.M. Productive behaviors of global business teams. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 20 2 (1996) 227-259
60. Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (1991), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
61. Hofstede G., and Bond M.H. Confucius & economic growth: New trends in culture's consequences. Organizational Dynamics 16 (1988) 4-21
62. Holland S., Gaston K., and Gomes J. Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development. International Journal of Management Reviews 2 (2000) 231-259
63. Hollingshead A., McGrath J., and O'Connor K. Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research 24 (1993) 307-333
64. Iacono, S., & Weisband, S. (1997). Developing trust in virtual teams. In: R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HI, USA.
65. Ishaya T., and Macaulay L. The role of trust in virtual teams. Electronic Journal of Virtualness 1 (1999) 140-157
66. Jang C., Steinfield C., and Pfaff B. Virtual team awareness and groupware support: An evaluation of the team SCOPE system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56 (2001) 109-126
67. Jarvenpaa S.L., and Leidner D.E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science 10 (1999) 791-815
68. Jarvenpaa S.L., Knoll K., and Leidner D.E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (1998) 29-64
69. Jarvenpaa S.L., Shaw T.R., and Staples D.S. Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research 15 (2004) 250-267
70. Jehn K.A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995) 256-282
71. Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., and Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1999) 741-763
72. Jehn K.A., and Mannix E.A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal 44 (2001) 238-251
73. Kayworth T., and Leidner D. Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (2001/2002) 7-40
74. Kim Y., Hiltz S.R., and Turoff M. Coordination structures and system restrictiveness in distributed group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation 11 (2002) 379-404
75. Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2004). On the genesis, nature and role of virtuality in work teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
76. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C., Telsuk, P., & McPherson, S. (2002). Seven challenges to virtual team performance: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON.
77. Knoll K., and Jarvenpaa S.L. Working together in global virtual teams. In: Igbaria M., and Tan M. (Eds). The virtual workplace (1998), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA 2-23
78. Larsen K., and McInerney C. Preparing to work in the virtual organization. Information & Management 39 (2002) 445-456
79. Leonard D.A., Brands P.A., Edmondson A., and Fenwick I. Virtual teams: Using communications technology to manage geographically dispersed development groups. In: Bradley S.P., and Nolan R.L. (Eds). Sense and respond: Capturing value in the network era (1998), HBS Press, Boston, MD 285-298
80. Lu, M., Wynn, E., Chudoba, K. M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2003). Understanding virtuality in a global organization: Toward a virtuality index. Paper presented at the twenty-fourth international conference on information systems, Seattle, WA.
81. Lurey J., and Raisinghani M. An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management 38 (2001) 523-544
82. Majchrzak A., Rice R., Malhotra A., King N., and Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly 24 (2000) 569-600
83. Malhotra A., Majchrzak A., Carman R., and Lott V. Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS Quarterly 25 (2001) 229-249
84. Mark G. Conventions and commitments in distributed CSCW groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11 (2002) 349-387
85. Marks M.A., Mathieu J.E., and Zaccaro S.J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review 26 (2001) 276-356
86. Martins L.L., Gilson L.L., and Maynard M.T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here. Journal of Management 6 (2004) 805-835
87. Massey A.P., Montoya-Weiss M., and Hung C. Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (2003) 129-156
88. May A., and Carter C. A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27 (2001) 171-186
89. Maynard, M. T. (2004). Shared mental model development: The role of team virtualness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
90. McDonough E., Kahn K., and Barczak G. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and collocated new product development teams. Journal of Production Innovation Management 18 (2001) 110-120
91. McGrath J.E. Groups: Interaction and performance (1984), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
92. Milliken F.J., and Martins L.L. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21 (1996) 402-433
93. Morello, D. (2005). The human impact of business IT: How to avoid diminishing returns, Gartner, Inc. Research Report, ID Number G00125740, January 7.
94. Mortensen M., and Hinds P. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management 12 (2001) 212-238
95. Mortensen M., and Hinds P. Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed work (2002), MIT Press, London, UK 283-307
96. Nemiro J. The glue that binds creative virtual teams. In: Malhotra Y. (Ed). Knowledge management and virtual organizations (2000), Idea Group Publishing, London, UK 101-123
97. Nemiro J. Assessing the climate for creativity in virtual teams. In: Beyerlein M., Johnson D., and Beyerlein S. (Eds). Virtual teams (2001), Elsevier, Oxford, UK 59-81
98. Nemiro J. The creative process in virtual teams. Creativity Research Journal 14 (2002) 69-83
99. Nowak K.L. Sex categorization in computer mediated communication (CMC): Exploring the utopian promise. Media Psychology 5 (2003) 83-103
100. Ocker, R. (2001). The relationship between interaction, group development, and outcome: A study of virtual communication. In: R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HI, USA.
101. Okhuysen G.A., and Eisenhardt K.M. Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science 13 (2002) 370-386
102. O'Leary, M. C., & Cummings, J. N. (2002). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, CO.
103. Olson J., Olson G., and Meader D. Face-to-face group work compared to remote group work with and without video. In: Finn K., Sellen A., and Wilbur S. (Eds). Video-mediated communication (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 157-172
104. Olson, J., & Teasley, S. (1996). Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation. In: M. S. Ackerman (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
105. Pauleen D.J. Virtual teams: Projects, protocols and processes (2004), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA
106. Pauleen D.J., and Yoong P. Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 11 (2001) 190-202
107. Pawar K.S., and Sharifi S. Physical or virtual team collocation: Does it matter. International Journal of Production Economics 52 (1997) 283-290
108. Pearce C., Yoo Y., and Alavi M. Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical versus shared leadership in the nonprofit sector. In: Riggio R.E., and Smith Orr S. (Eds). Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations (2004), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 180-203
109. Pelled L.H. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science 76 (1996) 615-631
110. Piccoli G., and Ives B. Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly 27 (2003) 365-395
111. Piccoli G., Powell A., and Ives B. Virtual teams: Team control structure, internal processes, and team effectiveness. Information Technology and People 17 (2004) 359-379
112. Pinsonneault A., and Boisvert M. The impacts of telecommuting on organizations and individuals: A review of the literature. In: Johnson N.J. (Ed). Telecommuting and virtual offices: Issues & opportunities (2001), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA 163-185
113. Powell A., Piccoli G., and Ives B. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 35 (2004) 6-36
114. Ramesh, V., & Dennis, A. R. (2002). The object-oriented team: Lessons for virtual teams from global software development. In: R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HI, USA.
115. Ratcheva, V. (2004). Exploring diversity in multidisciplinary teams. Paper presented at the fifth European conference on organizational knowledge, learning and capabilities, Innsbruck, Austria.
116. Ratcheva V., and Vyakarnam S. Exploring team formation processes in virtual partnerships. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 12 (2001) 512-523
117. Rennecker, J. A. (2002). The situated nature of virtual teamwork: Understanding the constitutive role of "place" in the enactment of virtual work configurations. Paper presented at Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, CO.
118. Rock, K. W., Pratt, M. G., & Northcraft, G. B. (2002). The effects of faultlines and communication media on identification in virtual teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, CO.
119. Rosen, B., & Tesluk, P. (2002). Understanding reactions to working in virtual team environments: Integrating team and technology factors. Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON.
120. Ruhleder K., and Jordan B. Co-constructing non-mutual realities: Delay-generated trouble in distributed interaction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 10 (2001) 113-138
121. Sarker S., Lau F., and Sahay S. Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 32 (2001) 38-56
122. Saunders C.S. Virtual teams: Piecing together the puzzle. In: Zmud R.W. (Ed). Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past (2000), Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, OH 29-50
123. Saunders, C. S., & Ahuja, M. K. (2000). A framework for understanding temporal issues of virtual teams. Working Paper. University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
124. Sessa V.I., Hansen M.C., Prestridge S., and Kossler M.E. Geographically dispersed teams: An annotated bibliography (1999), Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC
125. Staples D.S., and Cameron A.F. Creating positive attitudes in virtual team members. In: Godar S., and Ferris P. (Eds). Virtual & collaborative teams: Process, technologies & practice (2004), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA 76-98
126. Straus S.G. Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research 27 (1996) 115-142
127. Straus S.G. Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction 12 (1997) 227-266
128. Swann Jr. W.B., Polzer J.T., Seyle D.C., and Ko S.J. Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review 29 (2004) 9-27
129. Tan B.C.Y., Wei K.K., Sia C.L., and Raman K.S. A partial test of the task-medium fit proposition in a group support system environment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6 (1999) 47-66
130. Thompson, L. F., & Coovert, M. D. (2002). When intelligent agents join the team: Examining human-computer collaboration. Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON.
131. Townsend A.M., DeMarie S.M., and Hendrickson A.R. Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive 12 (1998) 17-29
132. Townsend A.M., DeMarie S.M., and Hendrickson A.R. Desktop video conferencing in virtual workgroups: Anticipation, system evaluation, and performance. Information Systems Journal 11 (2001) 213-223
133. Tullar W., and Kaiser P. The effect of process training on process and outcomes in virtual groups. The Journal of Business Communication 37 (2000) 408-427
134. Tyran K.L., Tyran C.K., and Shepherd M. Exploring emerging leadership in virtual teams. In: Gibson C.B., and Cohen S.G. (Eds). Virtual teams that work (2003), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 183-195
135. Van der Vegt G.S., Van de Vliert E., and Oosterhof A. Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal 46 (2003) 715-727
136. Walther J.B. Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research 20 (1994) 473-501
137. Walther J.B. Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research 23 (1997) 342-369
138. Warkentin M., and Beranek P. Training to improve virtual team effectiveness. Information Systems Journal 9 (1999) 271-289
139. Warkentin M., Sayeed L., and Hightower R. Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences 28 (1997) 975-996
140. Webster, J., & Wong, W. (2003). Group identity, trust, and communication in naturally occurring project teams. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
141. Weekes, S. (2005). Focus on virtual teams. Personnel Today, 11(January 25) (accessed May 1, 2006 at http://www.personneltoday.com/Articles/2005/01/25/27605/Focus+on+virtual+teams.htm#ArticleBody).
142. Weisband S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed work (2002), MIT Press, London, UK 311-333
143. Woerner, S. L., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2004). The media toolbox: Combining media in organizational communication. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
144. Yager, S. (1999). Using information technology in a virtual work world: Characteristics of collaborative workers. In: W. Nance (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on computer personnel research, New Orleans, LA (pp. 73-78).
145. Yammarino F.J., and Dubinsky A.J. Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. Personnel Psychology 47 (1994) 787-811
146. Yeatts C., and Hyten D.E. High-performing self-managed work teams: A comparison of theory to practice (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
147. Ziegert, J. C., Klein, K. J., & Xiao, Y. (2004). Virtual leaders: The impact of distance and leadership on teams. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.