A study of partially distributed work groups: The impact of media, location, and time on perceptions and performance

Small Group Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 453-490

  Burke, Kelly ^a   Aytes, Kregg ^b   Chidambaram, Laku ^b   Johnson, Jeffrey J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033169252     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649649903000404     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Burke, K., &Chidambaram, L. (1994). Development in electronically-supported groups: A preliminary longitudinal study of distributed and face-to-face meetings. In R. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh Hawaii international conference on system sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 101-113). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
2. Chidambaram, L., Bostrom, R. P., & Wynne, B. E. (1990-1991, Winter). A longitudinal study of the impact of group decision support systems on group development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 7-25.
3. Chidambaram, L., & Jones, B. (1993). Impact of communication medium and support on group perceptions and performance. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 465-491.
4. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
5. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355-366.
6. Dufner, D. K., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1994). Distributed group support: A preliminary analysis of the effects of voting tools and sequential procedures. In R. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh Hawaii international conference on system sciences (Vol 4., pp. 114-122). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
7. Gersick, C.J.G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
8. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences, Human Communication Research, 13(2), 225-252.
9. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10. Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. (1979). Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Kelly, J. R. (1988). Entrainment in individual and group behavior. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 89-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Kinney, S., & Dennis, A. (1994). Reevaluating media richness: Cues, feedback, and task. In R. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh Hawaii international conference on system sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 21-30). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
13. Kraut, R., Galegher, J., Fish, R., & Chalfonte, B. (1992). Task requirements and media choice in collaborative writing. Human Computer Interaction, 7(4), 375-407.
14. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP). A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147-174.
16. Mosier, J. N., & Tammaro, S. G. (1994). Video teleconference use among geographically dispersed work groups: A field investigation of usage patterns. Journal of Organizational Computing, 4(4), 343-365.
17. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storresten, M., & Carter, M. (1992). How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome. Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) (pp. 91-98). New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
18. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.
20. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 372(11), 1492-1512.
21. Trevino, L. K., Daft, R., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 71-94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 518-538). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Valacich, J. S., Mennecke, B. E., Wachter, R., & Wheeler, B. C. (1994). Extensions to media richness theory: A test of the task-media fit hypothesis. In R. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh Hawaii international conference on system sciences (Vol. 4, pp.11-20). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
24. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
25. Walther, J. B. (1995, March). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time in computer-mediated interaction. Organization Sciene, 6(2), 186-203.
26. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.