Participation of children with dyslexia in compulsory education: Current public policy issues

Dyslexia

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 51-67

  Konur, Ozcan ^a  

^a NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Access to justice; Children with dyslexia; Disability Discrimination Act (1995); Education Act (1996); Educational negligence; Educational psychologists; Statement of special educational needs; The UK

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COURT; DYSLEXIA; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LAW; LEARNING DISORDER; LEGAL ASPECT; PARENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLICY; SCHOOL; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

CHILD; DYSLEXIA; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PUBLIC POLICY; TEACHING;

EID: 33344463637     PISSN: 10769242     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dys.299     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams v. Bracknell Forest Borough Council (2003). E.L.R. 409 (CA).
2. Adams v. Bracknell Forest Borough Council (2004). UKHL 29 (HL).
3. Anonymous (2003). Letter: Lesson for Archer, Guardian, 19 September 2003, 27.
4. Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., & Ustun, T. B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science and Medicine, 48(9), 1173-1187.
5. Bines, H. (2000). Inclusive Standards? Current developments in policy for special educational needs in England and Wales. Oxford Review of Education, 26(1), 21-33.
6. Black-Branch, J. L. (2000). Equality, non-discrimination and the right to special education: From international law to the Human Rights Act. European Human Rights Law Review, 3, 297-314.
7. Blair, A., & Lawson, A. (2003). Disability discrimination reforms in education: Could do better? Child and Family Law Quarterly, 15(1), 41-56.
8. Bricher, G. (2000). Disabled people, health professionals and the Social Model of Disability: Can there be a research relationship? Disability and Society, 15(5), 781-794.
9. Buck, D. (1998). The relationship between educational psychologists' assessments and the allocation of provision to children with special educational needs. Educational and Child Psychology, 15(4), 91-102.
10. Copeland, I. C. (1999). Normalisation: An analysis of aspects of special educational needs. Educational Studies, 25(1), 99-111.
11. Croll, P. (2001). Children with statements in mainstream key stage two classrooms: A survey in 46 primary schools. Educational Review, 53(2), 137-145.
12. Croll, P., & Moses, D. (1998). Pragmatism, ideology and educational change: The case of special educational needs. British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(1), 11-25.
13. Croll, P., & Moses, D. (2000). Continuity and change in special school provision: Some perspectives on local education authority policy-making. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 177-190.
14. v. Falkirk Council and Scottish Ministers (2003). S.L.T. 1323 (CS).
15. Department for Education and Employment (1997). Excellence for all children: Meeting special educational needs, Cm 3785. London: Stationery Office.
16. Disability Discrimination Act (1995). Chapter 50. London: Stationery Office.
17. Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill (2003). Edinburgh: Stationery Office.
18. Education (Northern Ireland) Order (1996). SI 1996/274 (NI.1). London: Stationery Office.
19. Education (Scotland) Act (1980). Chapter 44. London: Stationery Office.
20. Education (Special Educational Needs) (Wales) Regulations (2002). SI 2002/152. London: Stationery Office.
21. Education Act (1944). Chapter 31. London: Stationery Office.
22. Education Act (1981). Chapter 60. London: Stationery Office.
23. Education Act (1993). Chapter 35. London: Stationery Office.
24. Education Act (1996). Chapter 56. London: Stationery Office.
25. Education Act (2002). Chapter 42. London: Stationery Office.
26. Getty, D., & Gray, A. M. (2001). Special educational needs: The code of practice and local administration in Northern Ireland and Britain. Educational Management and Administration, 29(4), 411-424.
27. Greenwold, J. (2000). Lawyers in the classrooom: The new law of educational negligence. Education and the Law, 12(4), 245-258.
28. v. London Borough of Hounslow and SENDT (2004). EWCA Civ 770 (CA).
29. Human Rights Act (1998). Chapter 42. London: Stationery Office.
30. Hyde, M. (2000). From welfare to work? Social policy for disabled people of working age in the United Kingdom in the 1990s. Disability and Society, 15(2), 327-341.
31. v. Hampshire County Council (1985). 84 L.G.R. 547 (HC).
32. Janiga, S. J., & Costenbader, V. (2002). The transition from high school to postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A survey of college service coordinators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5), 462-468.
33. v. Bristol City Council and SENT (2003). EWHC 244 (HC).
34. Keating v. Bromley London Borough Council (1995). A.C. 633 (HL).
35. Keating v. Bromley London Borough Council (2003). E.L.R. 590 (HC).
36. Kenworthy, J., & Whittaker, J. (2000). Anything to declare? The struggle for inclusive education and children's rights. Disability and Society, 15(2), 219-231.
37. Konur, O. (2002a). Assessment of disabled students in higher education: Current public policy issues. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 131-152.
38. Konur, O. (2002b). Access to employment by disabled people in the UK: Is the Disability Discrimination Act working? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 5(4), 247-280.
39. Limitation Act (1980). London: Stationery Office.
40. v. Brighton and Hove City Council and SENDT (2003). E.L.R. 752 (HC).
41. Meyer, M. S. (2000). The ability-achievement discrepancy: Does it contribute to an understanding of learning disabilities? Educational Psychology Review, 12(3), 315-337.
42. North, D. C. (1991). Towards a theory of institutional change. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 31(1), 3-11.
43. Northern Ireland Audit Office (1998). Special Education in Northern Ireland, HC Paper No. 898 (Session 1997/98). London: Stationery Office.
44. Norwich, B. (2000). Educational psychology and special educational needs: How they relate and where is the relationship going? Educational and Child Psychology, 17(2), 5-15.
45. Oliver, M. (1992). Changing social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 101-114.
46. v. United Kingdom (1997). 28915/95, Eur. Comm. H. R.
47. Padget, S. Y. (1998). Lessons from research on dyslexia: Implications for a classification system for learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(2), 167-178.
48. Phelps v. Hillingdon London Borough Council (2001). 2 A.C. 619 (HL).
49. Riddell, S., Wilson, A., Adler, M., & Mordaunt, E. (2002). Parents, professionals and special educational needs policy frameworks in England and Scotland. Policy and Politics, 30(3), 411-426.
50. Rowe v. Kingston upon Hull City Council, Essex County Council (2003). EWCA Civ 1281 (CA).
51. Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (2001). Chapter 10. London: Stationery Office.
52. Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (2002). Special Educational Needs Tribunal Annual Report 2001/2002. London: Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal.
53. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 45(1), 2-40.
54. Vogel, S. A., & Adelman, P. B. (2001). Adults with learning disabilities 8-15 years after college. Learning Disabilities: Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 165-182.
55. v. Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council and SENT (2003). EWHC 2880 (Admin) (HC).
56. Welsh National Assembly (2003). Inclusive Education. Cardiff: Welsh National Assembly.
57. Welsh Office (1997). Special Needs Education - The BEST for Special Education, Cm 3792. London: Stationery Office.