Disabled People, Health Professionals and the Social Model of Disability: Can there be a research relationship?

Disability and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 781-793

  Bricher, Gillian ^a  

^a WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346629890     PISSN: 09687599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713662004     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. ANDERSON, J.M. (1991) Reflexivity in fieldwork: toward a feminist epistemology, IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(2), pp. 115-118.
2. AVERY, D. (1999) Talking 'tragedy': identity issues in the parental story of disability, in: M. CORKER & S. FRENCH (Eds) Disability Discourse, pp. 116-126 (Buckingham, Open University Press).
3. BARNES, C. (1992) Qualitative research: valuable or irrelevant, Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), pp. 115-124.
4. BARNES, C. (1995) Review of disability is not measles, Disability & Society, 10(3), pp. 378-381.
5. BARNES, C. (1996) Disability and the myth of the independent researcher, Disability & Society, 11(1), pp. 107-110.
6. BARTON, L. (1994) Disability, difference and the politics of definition, Australian Disability Review, 3, pp. 8-22.
7. BOCHEL, C. & BOCHEL, H. (1994) Researching disability: insights from and on the social model, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 17, pp. 82-86.
8. BRICHER, G.R. (1999) A voice for people with disabilities in the parenatal screening debate, Nursing Inquiry, 6, pp. 65-67.
9. BURY, M. (1996) Disability and the myth of the independent researcher: a reply, Disability & Society, 11(1), pp. 111-113.
10. CHINN, P.L. & KRAMER, M.K. (1991) Theory and Nursing, a Systematic Approach (St Louis, MO, Mosby).
11. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (1992) Disability Discrimination Act (Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia).
12. CORKER, M. (1999) Discriminatory language, talking disability, and the quiet revolution in language change, in Annual Conference of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, 17th Sept, University of Edinburgh.
13. CRADDOCK, J. (1996a) Responses of the occupational therapy profession to the perspective of the disability movement, part 1, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(1), pp. 17-22.
14. CRADDOCK, J. (1996b) Responses of the occupational therapy profession to the perspective of the disability movement, part 2, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(2), pp. 73-78.
15. DAVIS, K. (1993) The Crafting of Good Clients, in: J. SWAIN, V. FINKELSTEIN, S. FRENCH & M. OLIVER (Eds) Disabling Barriers - Enabling Environments (London, Sage).
16. DENZIN, N.K. (1994) The art and politics of interpretation, in: N.K. DENZIN & Y.S. LINCOLN (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 500-515 (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
17. DRAKE, R.F. (1997) What am I doing here? 'Non-disabled' people and the disability movement, Disability & Society, 12(4), pp. 643-645.
18. FELSKE, A.W. (1994) Knowing about knowing: margin notes on disability research, in: M.M. RIOUX & M. BACH (Eds) Disability is Not Measles, New Research Paradigms in Disability, pp. 181-199 (Toronto, Ont. L'Institut Roeher).
19. FINE, M. & ASCH A. (1988) Disability beyond stigma: social interaction, discrimination and activism,' Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), pp. 3-21.
20. FRENCH, S. (1993) 'Can you see the rainbow?' The roots of denial, in: J. SWAIN, V. FINKELSTEIN, S. FRENCH & M. OLIVER (Eds) Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments, pp. 69-77 (London, Sage).
21. FRENCH, S. (1994a) Disabled people and professional practice, in: S. FRENCH (Ed.) On Equal Terms - working with disabled people, pp. 103-118 (Oxford, Butterworth Heinneman).
22. FRENCH, S. (1994b) The disabled role, in: S. FRENCH (Ed.) On Equal Terms - working with disabled people (Oxford, Butterworth Heinneman).
23. FRENCH, S. (1994c) Researching disability, in: S. FRENCH (Ed) On Equal Terms - working with disabled people, pp. 136-147 (Oxford, Buttenvorth Heinneman).
24. FRENCH, S. & SWAIN, J. (1997) Changing disability research: participatory and emancipatory research with disabled people, Physiotherapy, 83(1), pp. 26-32.
25. GLEESON, B.J. (1997) Disability studies: a historical materialistic view, Disability & Society, 12(2), pp. 179-202.
26. GOODALL, C.J. (1995) Is disability any business of nurse education? Nurse Education Today, 15, pp. 323-327.
27. KEARNEY, P. (1999) Disability studies and nurse education - building understanding, Society for Disability Studies "Disability Across the Disciplines", 12th Annual Meeting 27-30 May, Washington, D.C.
28. LIGGETT, H. (1988) Stars are not born: an interpretive approach to the politics of disability, Disability, Handicap and Society, 3(3), pp. 263-275.
29. LINTON, S. (1998) Claiming Disability, Knowledge and Identity (New York, New York University Press).
30. LLOYD, M., PRESTON-SHOOT, M., TEMPLE, B. & Wu, R. (1996) Whose project is it anyway? Sharing and shaping the research and development agenda, Disability & Society, 11(3), pp. 301-315.
31. MASTERSON, A. (1994) Disability, in: P. GOUGH (Ed.) Nursing and Social Policy, Care in Context, pp. 213-240 (Oxford, Butterworth Heinneman).
32. MOORE, M., BEAZLEY, S. & MAELZER, J. (1998) Researching Disability Issues (Buckingham, Open University Press).
33. MORRIS, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice (London, Women's Press).
34. MORRIS, J. (1992) Personal and political: a feminist perspective on researching and disability, Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), pp. 157-166.
35. MORRIS, J. (1997). Gone missing? Disabled children living away from their families, Disability & Society, 12(2), pp. 241-258.
36. NORTHWAY, R. (1997) Disability and oppression: some implications for nurses and nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, pp. 736-743.
37. OLIVER, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke, Macmillan).
38. OLIVER, M. (1992) Changing the social relations of research production, Disability, Handicap and Society 7(2), pp. 101-114.
39. OLIVER, M. (1993) Re-defining disability: a challenge to research, in: J. SWAIN, V. FINKELSTEIN, S. FRENCH & M. OLIVER (Eds) Disabling Barriers - Enabling Enabling Environments (London, Sage).
40. OLIVER, M. (1996) Defining impairment and disability, in: C. BARNES & G. MERCER (Eds) Exploring the Divide: illness and disability (Leeds, Disability Press).
41. OLIVER, M. (1997) Emancipatory research: realistic goal or impossible dream, in: C. BARNES & G. MERCER (Eds) Doing Disability Research (Leeds, Disability Press).
42. OLIVER, M. (1999) Final accounts and the parasite people, in: M. CORKER & S. FRENCH (Eds) Disability Discourse, pp. 183-191 (Buckingham, Open University Press).
43. PATTON, M.O. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Newbury Park, CA, Sage).
44. PRIESTLEY, M. (1998) Childhood disability and disabled childhoods, agendas for research, Childhood 5(2), pp. 207-223.
45. RAMCHARAN, P. & GRANT, G. (1994) Setting one agenda for empowering persons with a disadvantage within the research process, in: M.M. RIOUX & M. BACH (Eds) Disability is Not Measles, New Research Paradigms in Disability, pp. 227-244 (Toronto, Ont., L'Institut Roeher).
46. RICHARDSON, M. (1997) Addressing barriers: disabled rights and the implications for nursing of the social construct of disability, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, pp. 1269-1275.
47. RIOUX, M.H. (1994) New research direction and paradigms: disability is not measles, in: M.H. RIOUX & M. BACH (Eds) Disability is Not Measles, New Research Paradigms in Disability (Toronto, Ont., L'Institut Roeher).
48. RIOUX, M.H. & BACH, M. (1994) Forward to Disability is Not Measles, New Research Paradigms in Disability, pp. 1-7 (Toronto, Ont., L'Institut Roeher).
49. SCULLION, P.A. (1999) Conceptualizing disability in nursing:some evidence from students and their teachers, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(3), pp. 648-657.
50. SHAKESPEARE, T. (1993) Disabled people's self-organisation: a new social movement, Disability, Handicap and Society, 8(3), pp. 249-264.
51. SHAKESPEARE, T. (1996) Rules of engagement: doing disability research, Disability & Society, 11(1), pp. 115-119.
52. SHAKESPEARE, T. & WATSON, N. (1997) Defending the social model, Disability & Society, 12(2), pp. 293-300.
53. STONE, E. & PRIESTLEY, M. (1996) Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of the non-disabled researcher, British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), pp. 699-716.
54. UNION OF THE PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED AGAINST SEGREGATION (UPIAS) (1976) Fundamental Principles of Disability, (London, UPIAS).
55. WARD, L. & FLYNN, M. (1994) What matters most: disability research and empowerment, in: M.M. RIOUX & M. BACH (Eds) Disability is Not Measles, New Research Paradigms in Disability, pp. 29-48 (Toronto, Ont., L'Institut Roeher).
56. WOLFENSBERGER, W. (1991) Reflections on a lifetime in human services and mental retardation, Mental Retardation, 29(1), pp. 1-15.
57. WOODILL, G. (1994). The social semiotics of disability, in: M.M. RIOUX & M. BACH (Eds) Disability is Not Measles, New Research Paradigms in Disability, pp. 201-226 (Toronto, Ont., L'Institut Roeher).
58. WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (1980) International Classification of Impairment of Disabilities and Handicaps (Geneva, WHO).
59. ZARB, G. (1992) On the road to Damascus: first steps toward changing the relations of disability research production, Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), pp. 125-138.
60. ZARB, G. (1995) Modelling the social model of disability, Critical Public Health 6(2), pp. 21-29.
61. ZOLA, I.K. (1993) Self, identity and the naming question: reflections on the language of disability, Social Science and Medicine, 36(2), pp. 167-173.