One-year clinical evaluation of two polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in posterior permanent teeth

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 157-162

  De Moura, Flávio Renato Reis ^a   Piva, Evandro ^b   Guerra Lund, Rafael ^c   Palha, Beatriz ^d   Fernando Demarco, Flávio ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^d Faculdade de Odontologia da UFPel ^*

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Compomer; Dyract AP; F2000

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPOMERS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 3142674287     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abdalla Al, Alhadainy Ha, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent 1997;10: 18-20.
2. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Monting JS. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001;14:148-152.
3. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Monting JS. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000;25:259-264.
4. Balogh AE, Bouter D, Fazekas A, Degrange M. Effect of water storage and intrapulpal pressure on microleakage of three restorative materials. Forgov Sz 2000;93:257-261.
5. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC, Gilner PP. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:1245-1253.
6. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992;8:305-309.
7. Breschi L, Gobbi P, Falconi M, Ciavarelli L, Teti G, Mazzotti G. Evaluation of the F2000 bonding procedure: a high resolution SEM study. J Dent 2001; 29:499-507.
8. Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E. Influence of Dentin Conditioning on Bond Strength of Light-cured lonomer Restorative Materials and Polyacid-modified Composite Resin. J Clin Dent 1996;7:81-84.
9. Burgess JO, Norling BK, Rawls HR, Ong JL. Directly Placed Esthetic Restorative Materials. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:731-746.
10. Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:465-479.
11. Carvalho AS, Cury JA, Fluoride release from some dental materials in different solutions. Oper Dent 1999;24:14-19.
12. Çehreli ZC, Altay N. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in minimally-invasive occlusal cavities. J Dent 2000;28: 117-122.
13. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KLV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8 years findings. J Dent 1998;26:311-317.
14. da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nor JE. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:315-320.
15. Demarco FF, Matos AB, Matson E, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection influence sound dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 1998;23:294-298.
16. Demirci M, Ucok M. Two-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities. Am J Dent 2002;15:312-316.
17. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000;25:382-387.
18. Eichmiller FC, Marjenhoff WA. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998;23:218-228.
19. Eliades G, Kakaboura A, Palaghias G. Acid-base reaction and fluoride release profiles in visible light-cured polyacid-modified composite restoratives (compomers). Dent Mat 1998;14:57-63.
20. El-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1999;24:2-8.
21. El-Kalla, I. H. Marginal adaptation of Compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars. Am J Dent 1999;12:37-42.
22. Escribano N, Del-Nero O, de la Macorra JC. Sealing and dentin bond strength of adhesives systems in selected areas of perfused teeth. Dent Mat 2001;17:149-155.
23. Estefan D, Pines MS, Erakin C, Fuerst PF. Microleakage of class V using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study. J Clin Dent 1999;10: 124-126.
24. Evancusky JW, Meiers JC. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:39-42.
25. Garcia-Godoy F, Donly KJ Dentin/enamel adhesives in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:462-464.
26. Garcia-Godoy F. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:541-570.
27. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of storage media on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of four polyacid-modified composite resin (compomers). Dent Mater 1999;15:196-201.
28. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995;23:329-338.
29. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of enamel pretreatments on bond strength of compomer. Dent Mater 2001;17:402-408.
30. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth:1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:1088-1096.
31. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM, Blake SM. Localized wear of compomer restorative materials. Am J Dent 2001;14:238-240.
32. Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. A reliability study of clinical tooth wear measurements. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:597-602.
33. Loguercio AD, Barbosa AN, Busato ALS, Barros A. Avaliação Clínica de um ionômero de vidro modificado por resina e de uma resina poliácido modificada em lesões cervicais: Acompanhamento de 3 anos. Rev Bras Odont 2000;57:26-30.
34. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior: one-year results. Quintessence Int 2000;31: 630-636.
35. Luo Y, Lo EC, Wei SH, Tay FR. Comparison of pulse activation vs conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique. Dent Mater 2002;18:36-48.
36. Luo Y, Tay FR, Lo EC, Wei SH. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods. J Dent 2000;28:495-500.
37. Lutz F, Krejci I. Resin Composites in the post-amalgam age. Compen Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1143-1148.
38. Manhart J, Hickel R. Esthetic compomer restorations in posterior teeth using a new all-in-one adhesive: case presentation. J Esthet Dent 1999;11: 250-258.
39. Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, Van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 1999;33:387-392.
40. Mclean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25: 587-589.
41. Mjör IA, Jokstad A, Qvist V. Longevity of posterior restorations. Int Dent J 1990;40:11-17.
42. Moodley D, Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Oberholzer TG, Patel N. In vitro evaluation of two adhesive systems used with compomer filling materials. Int Dent J 2000;50:400-406.
43. Mount GJ. Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Oper Dent 1999;24:115-124.
44. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavadia K. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Pediatr Dent 1999;21: 231-234.
45. Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip HK, Shu M. In vitro fluoride release from aesthetic restorative materials following recharging with APF gel. Aust Dent J 2000; 45:198-203.
46. Perry R, Kugel G, Kunzelmann KH, Flessa HP, Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1472-1477.
47. Perry RD, Kugel G. Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:1067-1076.
48. Peters MCRB, Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen FWA. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-years results. Am J Dent 1996;9:83-87.
49. Peutzfeldt A, García-Godoy F, Asmunssen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent 1997;10:15-17.
50. Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clin Oral Investig 2002;6:244-248.
51. Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen FWA, Burgerskijk RCW. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-years results. Am J Dent 1996;11:143-148.
52. Russo EM, de Carvalho RC, Matson E, dos Santos RS. Microleakage in class V cavities restored with esthetic materials, using different restorative techniques. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2001;15:145-150.
53. Salama FS, Al-Hammad NS. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:39-46.
54. Stoll R, Remes H, Kunzelmann KH, Stachniss V. Marginal characteristics of different filling materials and filling methods with standardized cavity preparation. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:129-138.
55. Turgut MD, Tekcicek MU, Attar N, Sargon MF. Microleakage of two polyacid-modified resin composites under different conditioning methods in primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68:311-315.
56. Van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9:195-198.
57. Wendt SL Jr, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1994;7:207-211.