Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 128, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1088-1096

  Kitty, M Y ^a   Wei, Stephen H Y ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRISMA TPH RESIN COMPOSITE; RESIN; SILICATE;

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COLOR; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EVALUATION STUDIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; OBSERVER VARIATION; RECURRENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SILICATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0031203647     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0366     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Christensen GJ. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth. JADA 1996;127:106-8.
2. Williams P. Goodbye amalgam, hello alternatives? J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:139-44.
3. FDI World Dental Federation. Policy statement on mercury and amalgam in dentistry. FDI World 1992;1(2):14-7.
4. American Dental Association. American Dental Association statement on dental amalgam. Chicago: American Dental Association; December 1990.
5. United State Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Dental amalgam. A scientific review and recommended Public Health Service strategy for research, education, and regulation: final report of Subcommittee on Risk Management. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; January 1993.
6. FDI World Dental Federation and World Health Organization. Consensus statement on dental amalgam. FDI World 1995;4(4):9-10.
7. Widstrom E, Birn H, Haugejorden O, Sundberg H. Fear of amalgam: dentists' experiences in the Nordic countries. Int Dent J 1992;42:65-70.
8. FDI World Dental Federation. The amalgam story continues. FDI World 1994;3(4):13-6.
9. Tyas MJ. Dental amalgam - what are the alternatives? Int Dent J 1994;44:303-8.
10. McCabe JF. Resin-modified glass-ionomers (Abstract). 1st European Union Conference on Glass-ionomers. Warwick, England:University of Warwick; 1996:24-8.
11. Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA. Compomers - between glass-ionomer cements and composites (Abstract). 1st European Union Conference on Glass-ionomers. Warwick, England:University of Warwick; 1996:32.
12. Dentsply DeTrey. Dyract product profile. Konstanz, Germany: Dentsply DeTrey; 1994.
13. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:587-9.
14. Mount GJ. Glass ionomer cements and future research. Am J Dent 1994;7:286-92.
15. Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:222-5.
16. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass-ionomer materials: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995;8:59-67.
17. Krejci I, Gebauer L, Hausler T, Lutz F. Kompomere - Amalgamersatz fur Milchzahnkavitaten? [Composite polymers -an amalgam substitute for deciduous tooth cavities?] (English abstract). Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1994;104:724-30.
18. Peters MCRB, Roeters FJM. Clinical performance of a new compomer restorative in pediatric dentistry (Abstract no. 34). J Dent Res 1994;73:106.
19. Roeters FJM, Frankenmolen FWA. Two-years clinical evaluation of class I and II compomer restorations in deciduous molars (Abstract no. S8). Programme and Abstracts: 15th Congress International Association of Paediatric Dentistry. Sweden: International Association of Paediatric Dentistry; 1995;27.
20. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon PH, Kavadia K. Clinical evaluation of a compomer in class II restorations in deciduous teeth (Abstract no. 10). Abstracts: 3rd Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Belgium: European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry; 1996;33.
21. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-58.
22. Christensen GJ. Don't underestimate the class II resin. JADA 1992;123:103-4.
23. Summitt JB, Della Bona A, Burgess JO. The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design. Quintessence Int 1994;25:252-7.
24. Cortes O, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993;6:299-301.
25. Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Los SA. Bonding efficacy of a compomer using different conditioning procedures (Abstract no. 761). J Dent Res 1995;74:107.
26. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Shear bond strength, microleakage and gap formation with fourth generation dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1994;7:312-4.
27. Kanca J III, Gwinnett AJ. Successful marginal adaptation of a dentin-enamel bonding system in vitro and in vivo. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:286-94.
28. Triolo PT, Swift EJ, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1995;20:46-50.
29. Wendt SL Jr., Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1994;7:207-11.
30. Leinfelder KF. Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material. JADA 1991;122:65-70.
31. Wei SHY, Jensen M. Composite resin restoration. In: Wei SHY, ed. Paediatric dentistry: Total patient care. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988:199-223.
32. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL. Effect of finishing and degree of cure on composite wear (Abstract no. 145). J Dent Res 1990;69:127.
33. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder KF, Thomas J. Effect of finishing on the in-vivo wear rate of a posterior composite resin. JADA 1989;118:333-5.
34. Aboush YEY, Torabzadeh H. Bond strength of a compomer to enamel and dentin (Abstract no. 208). J Dent Res 1994;73:812.
35. Triana R, Prado C, Garro J, Garcia-Godoy F. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994;7:252-4.
36. Li Jianguo, von Beetzen M, Sundstrom F. Strength and setting behaviour of resinmodified glass ionomer cements. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:311-7.
37. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-9.