Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: One-year results

Quintessence International

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 630-636

  Luo, Y ^a   Lo, Edward C M ^a,b   Fang, Daniel T S ^a   Wei, Stephen H Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluation; Compomer; Polyacid modified resin composite; Wear

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND; SILICATE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPOMERS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL PULP DISEASES; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYVINYLS; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RECURRENCE; SILICATES; SILOXANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0034302202     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Peters MCRB, Roeters FJM, Frankenmolen FWA. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars. Am J Dent 1996; 9:83-88.
2. Hse KMY, Wei SHY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128: 1088-1096.
3. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:203-209.
4. Peutzfeldt A, Garcia-Godoy F, Asmussen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent 1997;10:15-17.
5. Yap AU, Teoh SH, Hastings GW, Lu CS. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:574-580.
6. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physicomechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-894.
7. Dyract AP technical manual. Konstanz, Germany: Dentsply DeTrey, 1997.
8. De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. Wear performance of polyacid modified resin composites [abstract 486]. J Dent Res 1997;76:74.
9. Latta MA, Randall CJ. Physical properties of compomer restorative materials [abstract 412]. J Dent Res 1999;78:157.
10. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
11. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding. A leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 1971;15: 107-113.
12. Van Dijken JWV, Horstedt P. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:185-190.
13. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:306-335.
14. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 1998;26:609-616.
15. Van Dijken JWV. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9:195-198.
16. Roeters JM, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk CW, Peters TCRB. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1998;11:143-148.
17. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998;23:77-80.
18. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. Int Dent J 1998;48:3-16.
19. Hse KMY, Leung SK, Wei SHY. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: A review. Aust Dent J 1999;44:1-11.
20. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime&Bond NT. Am J Dent 1999;12:77-83.
21. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63: 1396-1399.
22. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The polymerization shrinkage of composite resin. Dent Mater 1989;5:41-44.
23. Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:222-225.
24. Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip HK, Shu M. In vitro fluoride release from aesthetic restorative materials following recharging with APF gel. Aust Dent J (in press).