Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 37-43

  El Kalla, Ibrahim H ^a  

^a Mansoura University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOGLASS; COMPOMER; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; HYTAC; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILICATE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; SILICATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0033071483     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Rosen M, Melman GE, Cohen J. Changes in a light-cured composite resin material used to restore primary anterior teeth: An eighteen month in vivo study. J Dent Assoc S Africa 1990; 45: 251-255.
2. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 305-311.
3. Kilpatrick NM. Durability of restorations in primary molars. J Dent 1993; 21: 67-73.
4. Papathanasiou AG, Curzon MEJ, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16: 282-288.
5. Croll TP. Glass ionomers and esthetic dentistry: What the new properties mean to dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 51-54.
6. Croll TP, Killian CM, Helpin ML. A restorative dentistry renaissance for children: Light-hardened glass ionomer/resin cement. J Dent Child 1993; 60: 89-94.
7. Aguilar GDPC, Rosa OPS, Taga EM, et al. In vitro fluoride release and antimicrobial activity of restorative compomers. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 242 (Abstr 1089).
8. Xu X, Burgess, JO. Fluoride release and compressive strength of fluoride releasing materials J Dent Res 1998: 77: 242 (Abstr 1091).
9. Dyract. Light cured compomer restorative system. Dyract, Direction for use, Caulk, Dentsply 1996; 1-4.
10. Hytac Aplitip. light-cured compomer restorative. Introducing the Hytac Aplitip. ESPE America, 1997; 1-4.
11. Compoglass. Instructions for use. Vivadent Ets 1995; 1-5.
12. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976; 4; 199-206.
13. Shortall AC. Microleakage, marginal adaptation and composite resin restorations. Br Dent J 1982; 153: 223-227.
14. Youngson CC, Grey NJA, Glyn Jones J. In vitro marginal microleakage: Examination of measurements used in assessment. J Dent 1990; 18: 142-146.
15. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
16. Wieczkowski GJr, Xin YY, Davis EL, et al. Microleakage in various dentin bonding agent/composite resin systems. Oper Dent (Suppl) 1992; 5: 62-67.
17. Xin YY, Davis EL, Joynt RB, et al. Origination and progression of microleakage in a restoration with a smear layer-mediated dentinal bonding agent. Quint Int 1992; 23: 551-555.
18. Salama FS, Riad MI, Abdel Megid FY. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1995; 20: 31-36.
19. García-Godoy F, Finger WJ. Reliability of microleakage evaluation using dentin bonding agents. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 308 (Abstr 1636).
20. De Goes MF, Pachane GCF, García-Godoy F. Resin bond strength with different methods to remove excess water from the dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 298-301.
21. Wilson F, Heath JR, Watts DC. Finishing composite restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 79-87.
22. Northeast SE, Van Noort R. Surface characteristics of finished posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 278-288.
23. Stodard JW, Johnson GC. An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 491-495.
24. Harris RK, Phillips RW, Swartz ML. An evaluation of two resin systems for restoration of abraded areas. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:537-541.
25. Kidd EAM. Secondary caries. Dent Update 1981; 8: 253-260.
26. Eriksen HM, Pears G. In vitro caries related to marginal leakage around composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1978; 5: 15-20.
27. Brännström M. Communication between the oral environment and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984; 9: 57-68.
28. Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA. Dental composites/glass ionomer: The materials. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 44-49.
29. Roulet JF. Degradation of dental polymers. New York: Karger, 1987; 77-79.
30. Mazer RB, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM. Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 185-189.
31. Asmussen E, Jorgensen KD. A microscopic investigation of the adaptation of some plastic filling materials to dental cavity walls. Acta Odontol Scand 1972; 30: 3-21.
32. Cortés O, García-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993;6:299-301.
33. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, et al. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1530-1540.
34. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, et al. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quint Int 1993; 24: 618-631.
35. Pashley DH. Dentin: A dynamic substrate. A review. Scan Micros 1989; 3: 161-176.
36. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Polymeric adhesion to dentin. Contrasting substrates. Am J Dent 1990; 3:264-270.
37. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 241-246.
38. EL-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of compomers in primary and permanent teeth. Int J Pediatr Dent 1998;8:103-114.
39. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt MI, et al. Microleakage of Dyract restorative system in Class V applications. J Dent Res 1996; 77: 227 (Abstr 969).
40. Wells DL, Davis RD, Osborne PB. Effect of dentin treatment on the cervical marginal integrity of Class II composite restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 130 (Abstr 199).
41. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, et al. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1168-1178.
42. Hattab FN, Mok NYC, Agnew EC. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around restorative materials J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:193-197.
43. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silverstone LM. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer restorations. Quint Int 1986; 17: 527-532.
44. Serra MC, Cury JA. The in vitro effect of glass ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model. Quint Int 1992; 23: 143-147.