Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 143-148

  Roeters, Joost J M ^a   Frankenmolen, Frans ^a   Burgersdijk, Rob C W ^a   Peters, Tilly C R B ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SILICATE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PERIODONTICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSTHESIS; TIME;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOMERS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PROSTHESIS COLORING; SILICATES; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0032105241     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barr-Argholme M, Odén A, Dahllhöf G, et al. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 230-233.
2. Nelson GV, Osborne JW, Elliott N G, et al. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth. J Dent Child 1980; 47: 414-418.
3. Welbury RR, Walls AWG, Murray JJ, et al. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991;170:177-181.
4. Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The use of reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: A clinical trial. Br Dent J 1995;179:175-179.
5. Soltesz U. Ermüdungsverhalten von drei Glasiomerzementen unter zyklischer Wechselbelastung. Deuts Zahn Z 1994;49:929-932.
6. Reinhardt K-J. Ein Compomer als Amalgamersatz? Phillip J 1995; 12: 395-399.
7. Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53: 222-225.
8. Peters TCRB, Roeters JM, Frankenmolen FWA. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results. Am J Dent 1996;9:83-87.
9. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-358.
10. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding. A leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 1971;15:107-113.
11. Lugassy AA, Moffa JP. Laboratory model for the quantification of clinical occlusal wear. J Dent Res 1985;64:181 (Abstr 63).
12. Moffa JP, Lugassy AA. Calibration of evaluators utilizing the M-L occlusal loss scale. J Dent Res 1986;65:302 (Abstr 1197).
13. Kilpatrick N. Durability of restorations in primary molars. Review. J Dent 1993;21:67-73.
14. Walls AWG, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the primary dentition. Br Dent J 1988;165:13-17.
15. Tonn EM, Ryge G. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: A 4-year follow-up study. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 117: 603-606.
16. Gray GB, Paterson RC. Clinical assessment of glass ionomer/composite resin sealant restorations in permanent teeth: Results of a field trial after 1 year. Int J Paediatr Dent 1994;4:141-146.
17. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JWV, Stenberg R. Effect of cavity form on the durability of glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: A three-year clinical evaluation. J Dent Child 1995; 62: 197-200.
18. Strattmann AG, Donly KJ. Microleakage of Class II silver glass-ionomer/composite restorations. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 95-98.
19. Forsten L, Karjalainen S. Glass ionomers in proximal cavities of primary molars. Scand J Dental Res 1990; 98: 70-73.
20. Smales RJ, Gerke DC, White IL. Clinical evaluation of occlusal glass-ionomer, resin and amalgam restorations. J Dent 1990; 18: 243-249.
21. Hung TW, Richardson AS. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: One year results. J Can Dent Assoc 1990; 56: 239-240.
22. Östlund J, Möller K, Koch G. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars. A three year clinical evaluation. Swed Dent J 1992; 16: 81-86.
23. Croll TP. Lateral-access Class II restoration using-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement. Quint Int 1995;26:121-126.
24. Cortés O, García-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993;6:299-301.
25. Triana R, Prado C, Garro J, et al. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 252-254.
26. Forsten L, Karjalainen S. Glass ionomers in proximal cavities of primary molars. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 70-73.