Two-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 312-316

  Demirci, Mustafa ^a   Üçok, Mete ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SILICATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH DISCOLORATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; DENTAL FISSURES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; SILICATES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH DISCOLORATION;

EID: 0036824120     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Morand J-M, Jonas P. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restoration of posterior teeth with proximal carious lesions. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 389-394.
2. Gray GB. An evaluation of sealent restorations after 2 years. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 569-575.
3. Lutz F. State of the art of tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 237-248.
4. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems: Three-year results. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 10-14.
5. Vaikuntam J. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs): Implications for use in pediatric dentistry. ASDC J Dent Child 1997; 64: 131-134.
6. Hammesfahr PD. Developments in resionomer systems. In: Hunt PR. Glass Ionomers: The next generation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Pennsylvania: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, 1994; 47-56.
7. Mitra S. Curing reactions of glass ionomer materials. In: Hunt PR. Glass Ionomers: The next generation.Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Pennsylvania: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, 1994; 13-22.
8. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 59-67.
9. Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3: 425-429.
10. Burgess J, Norling B, Summitt J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: Tthe new generation. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 207-215.
11. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et al. Comparative physicomechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 883-894.
12. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 587-589.
13. Berg JH. The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry. A review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent 1998; 20: 93-100.
14. García-Godoy F. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 541-570.
15. Dentsply Detrey. Dyract product information Version III GB, 1994: 7/94.
16. Croll TP. Light-hardened Class I glass-ionomer-resin cement restoration of a permanent molar. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 109-113.
17. Mount GJ. Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 99-107.
18. Marks LAM, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE, et al. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 1999; 33: 387-392.
19. Mass E, Gordon M, Fuks AB. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: A retrospective study in children. ASDC J Dent Child 1999; 66: 93-97.
20. Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RCW, et al. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars:3-year results. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 143-148.
21. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, Garcíia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 18-20.
22. Cadenero M, Di Lenarda R, Cernaz A. A 42-month clinical evaluation of Dyract glass ionomer . J Dent Res 1998; 77: 953 (Abstr 2572).
23. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998; 23: 77-80.
24. van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resinmodified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 195-198.
25. van Dijken JWV. Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in Class III cavities. Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107: 215-219.
26. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-358.
27. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, Kremers L, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 391-397.
28. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, et al. New direct restorative materials. Int Dent J 1998; 48: 3-16.
29. Aguilar GDPC, Rosa OPS, Taga EM, et al. In vitro fluoride release and antimicrobial activity of restorative compomers. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 242 (Abstr 1089).
30. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrecthts P, et al. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 607-614.
31. Xu X, Burgess JO. Fluoride release and compressive strength of fluoride releasing materials. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 242 (Abstr 1091).
32. Hytac Aplitip. Light-cured compomer restorative. Introducing the Hytac Aplitip. ESPE America, 1997; 1-4.
33. Compoglass. Instructions for use. Vivadent Ets 1995: 1-5.
34. Abate PF, Bertacchini SM, Polack MA, et al. Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 509-512.
35. El-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Compomers adaptation to Class I and V cavities in permanent teeth. J Dent Child 2000; 67: 29-36.
36. Miyazaki M, Fukuishi K, Onose H. Influence of light irradiation on the volumetric change of polyacid-modified resin composites. J Dent 1999; 27: 149-153.
37. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, et al. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 610-615.
38. Cortés O, García-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 299-301.
39. Desai M, Tyas MJ. Adhesion to enamel of light-cured poly-acid dental materials. Aust Dent J 1996; 41: 393-397.
40. Cortés O, García C, Pérez L, et al. A comparison of the bond strength to enamel and dentin of two compomers: An in vitro study. ASDC J Dent Child 1998; 65: 29-31.
41. El-Kalla IH. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 37-43.
42. Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick RO, et al. Microleakage of Class V compomer and light-cured glass ionomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 261-263.
43. Owens BM, Halter TK, Brown DM. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 356-361.
44. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J Dent 1998; 26: 355-359.
45. Yip H-K, Smales RJ. Fluoride release from a polyacid-modified resin composite and 3 resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 261-266.
46. Yip H-K, Lam WTC, Smales RJ. Fluoride release, weight loss and erosive wear of modern aesthetic restoratives. Br Dent 1999; 187: 265-270.
47. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, et al. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 81-86.
48. Çehreli ZC, Altay N. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in minimally-invasive occlusal cavities. J Dent 2000; 28: 117-122.