Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 495-500

  Luo, Y ^a   Tay, F R ^a   Lo, E C M ^a   Wei, S H Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Conditioning; In vitro test; Marginal adaptation; Polyacid modified composite resin

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND; RESIN; SILICATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH FRACTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; REPLICA TECHNIQUES; SILICATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 0034268545     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00033-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hse KMY, Wei SHY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth; 1-year results. Journal of American Dental Association 1997;128:1088-96.
2. Roeters FJM, Frankenmolen FWA, Burgersdijk CW, et al. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars. American Journal of Dentistry 1998;11:143-8.
3. Bausch JR, De Lange K, Davidson CL, et al. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1982;48:59-67.
4. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dentineal composite. Journal of Dental Research 1984;63:146-8.
5. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The polymerization shrinkage of composite resin. Dental Materials 1989;5:41-44.
6. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et al. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Journal of Dental Research 1997;76:883-94.
7. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, et al. New direct restorative materials. International Dental Journal 1998;48:3-16.
8. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Gendusa NJ. Dentine adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dental Materials 1992;8:259-64.
9. Hansen EK. Effect of postponed polishing on marginal adaptation of resin used with dentine bonding agent. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1988;96:260-4.
10. Van Dijken JWV, Horstedt P. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Clinical Oral Investigation 1997;1:185-90.
11. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, et al. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:609-16.
12. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, et al. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime&Bond NT. American Journal of Dentistry 1999;12:77-83.
13. Attin T, Buchalla W, Hellwig E. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1996;76:29-33.
14. Cortes O, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. American Journal of Dentistry 1993;6:299-301.
15. Tay FR, Moulding KM, Pashley DH. Distribution of nanofillers from a simplified-step adhesive in acid-conditioned dentine. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 1999;1(2):103-17.
16. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. Pediatric Dentistry 1998;20:259-62.
17. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R. Marginal morphology of Class V composite restorations. American Journal of Dentistry 1997;10: 231-6.
18. Verslius A, Douglas WH, Cross M, et al. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? Journal of Dental Research 1996;75:871-8.
19. Jedrychowski JR, Bleier RG, Caputo AA. Shrinkage stresses associated with incremental composite filling technique. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1998;65:111-5.
20. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson AJ. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. Journal of Dental Research 1987;66:1636-9.
21. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentine bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. Journal of Dental Research 1984;63:1396-9.
22. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz N. Measurement of water sorption in dental composites. Biomaterials 1998;19:77-83.
23. Attin T, Buchalla W, Kielbassa AM, et al. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dental Materials 1995;11:359-62.
24. Irie M, Nakai H. Marginal sealability of resin-modified glass ionomers for base/liner: effect of hygroscopic expansion and bond strength. Dental Material Journal 1996;15:193-200.