Dentin/enamel adhesives in pediatric dentistry

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 462-464

  García Godoy, Franklin ^a   Donly, Kevin J ^b  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Acid etch; Adhesives; Pediatric restorative dentistry

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN;

CHILD; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTISTRY; DENTITION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CHILD; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DENTITION, PRIMARY; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HUMANS; PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY; SOCIETIES, DENTAL;

EID: 0036717572     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Manhart J, García-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior composite restorations: Clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin N Am. 2002;46:303-339.
2. García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite in Class II restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Acta Odontol Pediatr. 1984;5:9-11.
3. Östlund, Möller K, Koch G. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical evaluation. Swed Dent J. 1992;16:81-86.
4. Kreulen Cm, van Amerongen WE, Akerboom HBM, Borgmeijer PJ. Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations. J Dent Child. 1995;62:395-400.
5. Leifler E, Varpio M. Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a 2-year follow-up. J Dent Child. 1981;48:411-416.
6. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA. 1997;128:1088-1096.
7. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of a hybrid composite and a polyacid-modified composite resin in Class-II restorations in deciduous molars. Clin Oral Investig. 1998;2:115-119.
8. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Monting JS. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent. 2001;14:148-152.
9. Puppin-Rontani RM, GarcÌa-Godoy F, Voelzke CE, De Goes MF. Clinical evaluation of total-etch composite restorations in primary molars [abstract 523]. J Dent Res. 1998;77:697.
10. Barr-Agholme M, Oden A, Dahllof G, Modeer T. A 2-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Dent Mater. 1991; 7:230-233.
11. Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RC, Peters TC. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent. 1998;11:143-148.
12. Fagan TR, Crall JT, Jensen ME, et al. A comparison of two dentin bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1986;8:144-146.
13. Bordin-Avkroyd S, Sefton J, Davies EH. In vivo bond strengths of 3 current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dental Mater. 1992;8:74-78.
14. Araujo FB, García-Godoy F, Issao M. A comparison of 3 resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19:253-257.
15. Malferrari S, Finger WJ, García-Godoy F. Resin bonding efficacy of Gluma 2000 to primary dentine. Int J Paediatr Dent. 19955:73-80.
16. Salama FS. Gluma bond strength to the dentin of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994;19:35-40.
17. Elkins CJ, McCourt JW. Bond strength of dentinal adhesives in primary teeth. Quint Int. 1993;24:271-273.
18. MacLean S, McCourt JW, Chan DCN. Shear bond strengths of dentinal adhesives to primary dentin [abstract 2270]. J Dent Res. 1993;72:387.
19. Salama, FS, Tao L. Gluma bond strength to primary versus permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:163-166.
20. El-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of compomers in primary and permanent teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1998;8:103-114.
21. Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1396-1403.
22. García-Godoy F, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of acid solution and gel in occlusal fissures. JADA. 1987;114:809-810.
23. Brown MR, Foreman FJ, Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Penetration of gel and solution etchants in occlusal fissures. ASDC J Dent Child. 1988;55:265-268.
24. Gwinnett AJ, García-Godoy F. Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel. Am J Dent. 1992;5:237-239.
25. Hosoya Y. Resin adhesion to the primary enamel: influence of light-irradiation times. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1995;19:185-190.
26. Summitt JB, Chan DC, Dutton FB, Burgess JO. Effect of rinse time on microleakage between composite and etched enamel. Oper Dent. 1993;18:37-40.
27. García-Godoy F, Rodríguez M, Barbería E. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent. 1996;9:80-82.
28. El-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Fracture strength of adhesively restored pulpotomized primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child. 1999;66:238-242.
29. García-Godoy F, Hosoya Y. Bonding mechanism of Compoglass to dentin in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998;22:217-220.
30. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, García-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent. 1999;12:77-83.
31. García-Godoy F, Nicholson JW, McLean JW. Glass ionomer cements: Clinical applications. In: Malone WFP, Koth DL, eds. Tylman's Theory and Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics. St. Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1989:393-406.
32. Boksman L, Carson B. Two-year retention and caries rates of UltraSeal XT and FluoroShield light-cured pit and fissure sealants. Gen Dent. 1998;46:184-187.
33. García-Godoy F, Cooley RL, Ranly DM, Burger KM. Effect of dentin adhesives on sealant bond strength. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1991;15:241-243.
34. Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent. 1992;14:41-46.
35. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. JADA. 1993;124:68-72.