Composite restoration wear analysis: Conventional methods vs. Three-dimensional laser digitizer

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 131, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1472-1477

  Perry, Ronald ^a   Kugel, Gerard ^a   Kunzelmann, Karl Heinz ^c   Flessa, Hans Peter ^c   Estafan, Denise ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RESIN;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; MIDDLE AGED; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0034295391     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0060     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 1995;8:173-9.
2. Mazer RB, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM. Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater 1992;8:185-9.
3. Dietschi D, Dietschi JM. Current developments in composite materials and techniques. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8(7):603-13.
4. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. JADA 1995;126:663-76.
5. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco: U.S. Public Health Service; 1971. U.S. Public Health Service publication 790:244.
6. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analyzing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 1989;5: 157-60.
7. Leinfelder KF, Taylor DF, Barkmeier WW, Goldberg AJ. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1986;2:198-201.
8. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Rekow E, Wilder AD, Heymann HO. Confirmation of Leinfelder clinical wear standards. Dent Mater 1994;10:11-8.
9. Bryant RW. Comparison of three standards for quantifying occlusal loss of composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990;6:60-2.
10. Winkler MM, Lautenschlager EP, Boghosian A, Greener EH. Visual versus mechanical wear measurement of dental composite resin. J Oral Rehab 1996;23:494-500.
11. Lugassy AA, Moffa JP. Laboratory model for the quantification of clinical occlusal wear (abstract 63). J Dent Res 1985;64:181.
12. Moffa JP, Lugassy AA. Calibration of evaluators utilizing the M-L occlusal loss scale (abstract 1197). J Dent Res 1986;65:302.
13. Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Vuylsteke M, Davidson CL. Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations: a new three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent 1984;12:252-67.
14. Hewlett ER, Orro ME, Clark GT. Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems. Dent Mater 1992;8:49-53.
15. McDowell GC, Bloem TJ, Lang BR, Asgar K. In vivo wear. Part I: the Michigan computer-graphic measuring system. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:112-20.
16. Chadwick RG, Mitchell HL, Cameron I, Hunter B, Tulky M. Development of a novel system for assessing tooth and restoration wear. J Dent 1997;25:41-7.
17. Bangerter V, Christensen R, Christensen G. Method for determination of in vivo wear (abstract 158). J Dent Res 1987;66:126.
18. Roulet JF, Reich TH, Lutz F. High precision occlusal mapping: a new method for measuring wear of posterior composites (abstract 457). J Dent Res 1983;62:220.
19. Roulet JF. Development of appropriate measuring devices. In: Degradation of dental polymers. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1987:220.
20. Kunzelmann KH, Obermeier TH, Mehl A, Hickel R. Finite element analysis of megafillers/inserts to optimize shape and material properties (abstract 1402). J Dent Res 1995;74:187.
21. Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Petschelt A, Hickel R. Highly accurate 3D-data acquisition with a light sectioning laser sensor (abstract 1926). J Dent Res 1993;72:344.
22. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997;76:1799-807.
23. Lang BR, Bloem TJ, Powers JM, Wang R-F. The in vivo wear resistance of 12 composite resins. J Prosthodont 1992;1:2-10.
24. Coren S, Girgus JS. Seeing is deceiving: the psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates; 1978:32.
25. Paulus D, Kunzelmann KH, Kuppers S, Niemann H, Wolf H. Automatic CNC program generation from range data. Presented at the Conference on Mechatronics '95, 1995; Istanbul, Turkey.
26. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 1997;76:1508-16.
27. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of analyzing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 1989;5:157-60.
28. Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Comparison of several groups. Br Dent J 1989;166:341-3.