Esthetic compomer restorations in posterior teeth using a new all-in-one adhesive: Case presentation

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 250-258

  Manhart, Juergen ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; GLASS IONOMER; HYTAC; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH;

BICUSPID; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0033288056     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00406.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Attin T, Buchalla W. Mechanical and clinical evaluation of compomers [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998; 53:766–774.
2. Hickel R. Contemporary restorative materials [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1997; 52:572–585.
3. Höhnk HD, Hannig M. Dental materials with potential: compomers & co [in German]. Phillip J Restorative Zahnmed 1998; 15:264–269.
4. Powers JM, Farah JW, eds. Compomers. The Dental Advisor 1998; 15:1–5.
5. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. Int Dent J 1998; 48:3–16.
6. Li D, Manhart J, Fay RM, Hickel R, Powers JM. Color stability of composites, compomers, and ormocer by staining. Trans Acad Dent Materials 1998; 12:235.
7. Benz C, Stabel W, Mehl A, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of modified glass ionomers in Class II restorations. J Dent Res 1997; 76:165.
8. Huth K, Selbertinger S, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Compomer for Class I/II restorations: results after 6 months. J Dent Res 1999; 78:285.
9. Kontou E, Frankenberger R, Klinge S, Krämer N. Clinical performance of two compomer materials: six months follow-up. J Dent Res 1999; 78:391.
10. Hickel R, Kremers L, Haffner C. Compomers [in German]. Quintessenz 1996; 47:1581–1589.
11. Loher C, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical study on hybrid ionomers, compomers, and composites in Class V cavities [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1997; 52:525–529.
12. Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins. J Clin Dent 1996; 7:81–84.
13. Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E. Influence of enamel etching on bond strength of compomer filling materials [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1997; 52:463–466.
14. Cortes O, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993; 6:299–301.
15. Haller B, Moll K, Hofmann N, Klaiber B. Initial shear bond strength of glass ionomer-composite hybrid materials on conditioned and unconditioned enamel [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1997; 52:680–684.
16. Manhart J, Li D, Powers JM, Hickel R. Bonding of compomers to deep dentin under various surface conditions. J Dent Res 1998; 77:787.
17. Manhart J, Li D, Powers JM, Hickel R. Bond strength of VLC GICs, compomers, and composites. Trans Acad Dent Materials 1998; 12:236.
18. Moll KH, Haller B, Hofmann N, Klaiber B. Phosphoric acid etching and enamel bond of composite-glass ionomer hybrids. J Dent Res 1996; 75:171.
19. Roeder LB, Kim HB, Powers JM. Bond strength of bonding agents-compomers to dentin. J Dent Res 1998; 77:168.
20. Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Los SA. Bonding efficacy of a compomer using different conditioning procedures. J Dent Res 1995; 74:107.
21. Powers JM, Finger WJ, Xie J. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthodont 1995; 4:28–32.
22. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993; 9:295–299.
23. Breschi L, Perdigão J, Mazzotti G, Nunes MF, Gobbi P. Ultramorphology and shear bond strengths of self-etching adhesives on enamel. J Dent Res 1999; 78:475.
24. Issa MH, Watts DC. Shear strengths of a compomer adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent Res 1999; 78:446.
25. Li D, Powers JM. Bond strength of compomers with acidic primers to human enamel. J Dent Res 1999; 78:445.
26. Oberländer H, Friedl K-H, Schmalz G, Vasileva R, Hiller K-A. Bond strength of polyacid modified resins using a new one-step adhesive system. J Dent Res 1999; 78:446.
27. Peters MCRB, Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen FWA. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results. Am J Dent 1996; 9:83–87.
28. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:410–416.
29. Reeka A, Benz C, Loher C, Hickel R. Clinical study of the restoration of Class I and II cavities in the primary dentition with the compomer Dyract (in German). Annual Meeting of the German Association for Pediatric Dentistry, Leiptig, Germany, April 2122, 1995.
30. Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen FWA. Two-years’ clinical evaluation of Class I and II compomer restorations in deciduous molars. 15th Congress of the International Association of Pediatric Dentistry, Göteborg, Sweden, July 68, 1995.
31. Vulicevic ZR, Beloica D, Vulovic MA. A clinical trial of two compomer systems. J Dent Res 1997; 76:165.
32. Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RC, Peters TC. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1998; 11:143–148.
33. Hse KMY, Wei SHY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128:1088–1096.
34. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a poly-acid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998; 23:77–80.
35. Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, Van Dijken JW. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55:255–260.
36. Nunes MF, Perdigão J, Rosa BT. The effect of an experimental one-application self-conditioning adhesive on microleakage. J Dent Res 1999; 78:306.
37. Lopes M, Perdigão J, Ambrose WW. Ultramorphological study of dentin treated with a simplified adhesive. J Dent Res 1999; 78:475.
38. Manhart J, Li D, Powers JM, Hickel R. Time-dependence of bond strength of universal adhesives to enamel. J Dent Res 1998; 77:298.
39. Krejci I, Schüpbach P, Lutz F. Clinic of dentin adhesives: the concept of a differentiated application: total bonding and selective bonding and dentin sealing [in German]. Der Freie Zahnarzt 1994; 8:34–48.
40. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990; 6:167–171.
41. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of light intensity and configuration factor on polymerization stress. J Dent Res 1996; 75:294.
42. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1636–1639.