SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 315-320

  Da Silva Telles, Paloma Dias ^a   Moreira Machado, Maria Aparecida A ^a   Nör, Jacques Eduardo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; HYTAC; INORGANIC COMPOUND; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND; VITREMER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CARBON COMPOUNDS, INORGANIC; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0035406857     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ: The effect of dentin location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentin. J Dent 27:265-274, 1999.
2. Rueggeberg FA: Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 7:2-10, 1991.
3. Gwinnett AJ: Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 5:127-129, 1992.
4. Henderson M, Gallo J, Xu X, Burgess JO: Shear bond strength to wet and dry dentin. J Dent Res 79:443 (Abstr 2394), 2000.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ: A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 77:50-59, 1998.
6. Van Meerbeek, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G: Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quint Int 27:775-84, 1996.
7. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G: The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. II. Marginal qualities. Clin Oral Invest 1:19-26, 1997.
8. Haller B: Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 13:44-50, 2000.
9. Perdigao J, Lopez M: Dentin bonding - questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1:191-209, 1999.
10. Gwinnett AJ: Smear layer: morphological considerations. Oper Dent 3:3-12, 1984.
11. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Cobb CM, Chappell RP, Spencer P: The dentin surface: its influence on dentin adhesion. Part II. Quint Int 23:43-51, 1992.
12. Marshall GW: Dentin: microstructure and characterization. Quint Int 21:606-617, 1993.
13. Perdigao J, Lopez M: Dentin bonding - state of the art 1999. Comp Com Dent Educ 20:1151-1162, 1999.
14. Nunes MF, Perdigao J, Rosa BT: The effect of an experimental one-application self-conditioning adhesive on microleakage. J Dent Res 78:306 (Abstr. 1602), 1999.
15. Rosa BT, Perdigao J, Nunes MF: The effect of conditioner, adhesive, and restorative material on shear bond strengths. J Dent Res 78:392 (Abstr. 2294), 1999.
16. Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA: Dentin Bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res 75:1396-1403, 1996.
17. Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA: Dentin Bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 19:246-252, 1997.
18. Agreste MO, Feigal RJ, Bretz WA, Jacobson JJ, Nör JE: Dentin Bonding: SEM Evaluation of the Glass Ionomer- Dentin Interface. Lecta 12:103-108, 1997.
19. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E: The promotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16:265-273, 1982.
20. Erickson RL: Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent 17:81-94, 1992.
21. Causton BE: Improved bonding of composite restorative to dentin. Br Dent J 156:93-95, 1984.
22. Pashley DH: The effects of acid-etching on the pulpo-dentin complex. Oper Dent 17:229-242, 1992.
23. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G: Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater 14:294-306, 1998.
24. Morabato A, Defabianis P: The marginal seal of various restorative materials in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22:51-54, 1997.
25. Rodrigues JA, De Magalhaes CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Junior AL: In vitro microleakage of glass ionomer composite resin hybrid materials. Oper Dent 24:89-95, 1999.
26. Salama FS, Riad MI, Abdel-Megid FY: Microleakage and marginal gap of glass ionomer resin restorations. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20:31-36, 1995.