The study of G-protein coupled receptor oligomerization with computational modeling and bioinformatics

FEBS Journal

Volumn 272, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2926-2938

  Filizola, Marta ^a   Weinstein, Harel ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; GPCRs; Interface; Molecular modeling; Oligomerization

Indexed keywords

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; RHODOPSIN;

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; MEMBRANE MODEL; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SHORT SURVEY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DIMERIZATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; RHODOPSIN;

EID: 21344467203     PISSN: 1742464X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04730.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (89)

1. Breitwieser GE (2004) G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization: implications for G protein activation and cell signaling. Circ Res 94, 17-27.
2. Bai M (2004) Dimerization of G-protein-coupled receptors: roles in signal transduction. Cell Signal 16, 175-186.
3. Terrillon S & Bouvier M (2004) Roles of G-protein-coupled receptor dimerization. EMBO Report 5, 30-34.
4. Milligan G (2004) G protein-coupled receptor dimerization: function and ligand pharmacology. Mol Pharmacol 66, 1-7.
5. Cvejic S & Devi LA (1997) Dimerization of the delta opioid receptor: implication for a role in receptor internalization. J Biol Chem 272, 26959-26964.
6. AbdAlla S, Zaki E, Lother H & Quitterer U (1999) Involvement of the amino terminus of the B (2) receptor in agonist-induced receptor dimerization. J Biol Chem 274, 26079-26084.
7. Carrillo JJ, Pediani J & Milligan G (2003) Dimers of class A G protein-coupled receptors function via agonist-mediated trans-activation of associated G proteins. J Biol Chem 278, 42578-42587.
8. Carrillo JJ, Lopez-Gimenez JF & Milligan G (2004) Multiple interactions between transmembrane helices generate the oligomeric {alpha} 1b-adrenoceptor. Mol Pharmacol 66, 1123-1137.
9. Guo W, Shi L & Javitch JA (2003) The fourth transmembrane segment forms the interface of the dopamine D2 receptor homodimer. J Biol Chem 278, 4385-4388.
10. Fotiadis D, Liang Y, Filipek S, Saperstein DA, Engel A & Palczewski K (2003) Atomic-force microscopy: Rhodopsin dimers in native disc membranes. Nature 421, 127-128.
11. Liang Y, Fotiadis D, Filipek S, Saperstein DA, Palczewski K & Engel A (2003) Organization of the G protein-coupled receptors rhodopsin and opsin in native membranes. J Biol Chem 278, 21655-21662.
12. Fotiadis D, Liang Y, Filipek S, Saperstein DA, Engel A & Palczewski K (2004) The G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin in the native membrane. FEBS Lett 564, 281-288.
13. Schulz A, Grosse R, Schultz G, Gudermann T & Schoneberg T (2000) Structural implication for receptor oligomerization from functional reconstitution studies of mutant V2 vasopressin receptors. J Biol Chem 275, 2381-2389.
14. Gouldson PR & Reynolds CA (1997) Simulations on dimeric peptides: evidence for domain swapping in G-protein-coupled receptors? Biochem Soc Trans 25, 1066-1071.
15. Gouldson PR. Snell CR & Reynolds CA (1997) A new approach to docking in the beta 2-adrenergic receptor that exploits the domain structure of G-protein-coupled receptors. J Med Chem 40, 3871-3886.
16. Gouldson PR, Snell CR, Bywater RP, Higgs C & Reynolds CA (1998) Domain swapping in G-protein coupled receptor dimers. Prot Eng 11, 1181-1193.
17. Gouldson PR, Higgs C, Smith RE, Dean MK, Gkoutos GV & Reynolds CA (2000) Dimerization and domain swapping in G-protein-coupled receptors: a computational study. Neuropsychopharmacology 23, S60-S77.
18. Lee SP, O'Dowd BF, Ng GY, Varghese G, Akil H, Mansour A, Nguyen T & George SR (2000) Inhibition of cell surface expression by mutant receptors demonstrates that D2 dopamine receptors exist as oligomers in the cell. Mol Pharmacol 58, 120-128.
19. Hamdan FF, Ward SD, Siddiqui NA, Bloodworth LM & Wess J (2002) Use of an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy to map proximities between amino acid residues in transmembrane domains 1 and VII of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry 41, 7647-7658.
20. Hadac EM, Ji Z, Pinon DI, Henne RM, Lybrand TP & Miller LJ (1999) A peptide agonist acts by occupation of a monomeric G protein-coupled receptor: dual sites of covalent attachment to domains near TM1 and TM7 of the same molecule make biologically significant domain-swapped dimerization unlikely. J Med Chem 42, 2105-2111.
21. Overton MC & Blumer KJ (2002) The extracellular N-terminal domain and transmembrane domains 1 and 2 mediate oligomerization of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor. J Biol Chem 277, 41463-41472.
22. Maggio R, Vogel Z & Wess J (1993) Coexpression studies with mutant muscarinic/adrenergic receptors provide evidence for intermolecular 'cross-talk' between G-protein-linked receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 3103-3107.
23. Ridge KD, Lee SS et al. (1996) Examining rhodopsin folding and assembly through expression of polypeptide fragments. J Biol Chem 271, 7860-7867.
24. Kobilka BK, Kobilka TS, Daniel K, Regan JW. Caron MG & Lefwoeits RJ (1988) Chimeric α2-, β2-adrenergic receptors: delineation of domains involved in effector coupling and ligand binding specificity, Science 240, 1310-1316.
25. Schoneberg T, Liu J & Wess J (1995) Plasma membrane localization and functional rescue of truncated forms of a G protein-coupled receptor. J Biol Chem 270, 18000-18006.
26. Schoneberg T, Yun J, Wenkert D & Wess J (1996) Functional rescue of mutant V2 vasopressin receptors causing nephrogenic diabetes insipidus by a co-expressed receptor polypeptide. EMBO J 15, 1283-1291.
27. Gudermann T, Schoneberg T & Schultz G (1997) Functional and structural complexity of signal transduction via G-protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci 20. 399-427.
28. Nielsen SM, Elling CE & Schwartz TW (1998) Split-receptors in the tachykinin neurokinin-1 system - mutational analysis of intracellular loop 3. Eur J Biochem 251, 217-226.
29. Bakker RA, Dees G, Carrillo JJ, Booth RG, Lopez-Gimenez JF, Milligan G, Strange PG & Leurs R (2004) Domain swapping in the human histamine hi receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 311, 131-138.
30. Filizola M, Visiers I, Skrabanek L, Campagne F & Weinstein H (2003) Functional mechanisms of GPCRs in a structural context. In Strategies in molecular neuropharmacology (Schousboe A & Brauner-Osborne H, eds), pp. 235-266. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
31. Filizola M, Guo W, Javitch JA & Weinstein H (2005) Oligomerization domains of G-protein coupled receptors: insights into the structural basis of GPCR association. In Contemporary Clinical Neuroscience: the G-protein Coupled Receptor Handbook (Devi LA, ed), pp. 243-265. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
32. Valencia A & Pazos F (2002) Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12, 368-373.
33. Smith GR & Sternberg MJ (2002) Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12, 28-35.
34. Dixon JS (1997) Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section. Proteins Supplement 1, 198-204.
35. Oliveira L, Paiva AC & Vriend G (2002) Correlated mutation analyses on very large sequence families. Chembiochem 3, 1010-1017.
36. Oliveira L, Paiva AC & Vriend G (1999) A low resolution model for the interaction of G proteins with G protein- coupled receptors. Protein Eng 12, 1087-1095.
37. Horn F, van der Wenden EM, Oliveira L, AP IJ & Vriend G (2000) Receptors coupling to G proteins: is there a signal behind the sequence? Proteins 41, 448-459.
38. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR & Cohen FE (1996) Evolutionarily conserved Galphabetagamma binding surfaces support a model of the G protein-receptor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 7507-7511.
39. Lichtarge O, Sowa ME & Philippi A (2002) Evolutionary traces of functional surfaces along G protein signaling pathway. Methods Enzymol 344, 536-556.
40. Dean MK, Higgs C, Smith RE, Bywater RP, Snell CR, Scott PD, Upton GJ, Howe TJ & Reynolds CA (2001) Dimerization of G-protein-coupled receptors. J Med Chem 44, 4595-4614.
41. Moller S, Vilo J & Croning MD (2001) Prediction of the coupling specificity of G protein coupled receptors to their G proteins. Bioinformatics 17, S174-S181.
42. Oliveira L, Paiva PB, Paiva AC & Vriend G (2003) Sequence analysis reveals how G protein-coupled receptors transduce the signal to the G protein. Proteins 52, 553-560.
43. Madabushi S, Gross AK, Philippi A, Meng EC, Wensel TG & Lichtarge O (2004) Evolutionary trace of G protein-coupled receptors reveals clusters of residues that determine global and class-specific functions. J Biol Chem 279, 8126-8132.
44. Suel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA & Ranganathan R (2003) Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 10, 59-69.
45. Gouldson PR, Dean MK, Snell CR, Bywater RP, Gkoutos G & Reynolds CA (2001) Lipid-facing correlated mutations and dimerization in G-protein coupled receptors. Prot Eng 14, 759-767.
46. Gkoutos GV, Higgs C, Bywater RP, Gouldson PR & Reynolds CA (1999) Evidence for dimerization in the 2-adrenergic receptor from the evolutionary trace method. Intl J Quantum Chem Biophys Q74, 371-379.
47. Filizola M, Olmea O & Weinstein H (2002) Prediction of heterodimerization interfaces of G-protein coupled receptors with a new subtractive correlated mutation method. Prot Eng 15, 881-885.
48. Filizola M & Weinstein H (2002) Structural models for dimerization of G-Protein coupled receptors: the opioid receptor homodimers. Biopolymers (Peptide Sci) 66, 317-325.
49. Hernanz-Falcon P, Rodriguez-Frade JM, Serrano A, Juan D, del Sol A, Soriano SF, Roncal F, Gomez L, Valencia A, Martinez AC & Mellado M (2004) Identification of amino acid residues crucial for chemokine receptor dimerization. Nat Immunol 5, 216-223.
50. Soyer OS, Dimmic MW, Neubig RR & Goldstein RA (2003) Dimerization in aminergic G-protein-coupled receptors: application of a hidden-site class model of evolution. Biochemistry 42, 14522-14531.
51. Ballesteros JA & Weinstein H (1995) Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci 25, 366-428.
52. Livingstone CD & Barton GJ (1993) Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation. Comput Appl Biosci 9, 745-756.
53. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR & Cohen FE (1996) An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 257, 342-358.
54. Lichtarge O, Yamamoto KR & Cohen FE (1997) Identification of functional surfaces of the zinc binding domains of intracellular receptors. J Mol Biol 274, 325-337.
55. Chothia C & Lesk AM (1986) The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. Embo J 5, 823-826.
56. Zvelebil MJ, Barton GJ, Taylor WR & Sternberg MJ (1987) Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J Mol Biol 195, 957-961.
57. Upton G & Fingleton B (1985) Spatial Data Analysis by Example. Wiley, Chichester.
58. Fraczkiewicz R & Braun W (1998) Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules. J Computational Chem 19, 319-333.
59. Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke CA, Motoshima H, Fox BA, LeTrong I, Teller DC, Okada T, Stenkamp RE et al. (2000) Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289, 739-745.
60. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R & Valencia A (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 18, 309-317.
61. Oliveira L, Paiva ACM & Vriend G (1993) A common motif in G-protein coupled seven transmembrane helix receptors. J Comp Aid Mol Des 7, 649-658.
62. Zhou W, Flanagan C, Ballesteros JA, Konvicka K, Davidson JS, Weinstein H, Millar RP & Sealfon SC (1994) A reciprocal mutation supports helix 2 and helix 7 proximity in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Mol Pharmacol 45, 165-170.
63. Sealfon SC, Chi L, Ebersole BJ, Rodic V, Zhang D, Ballesteros JA & Weinstein H (1995) Related contribution of specific helix 2 and 7 residues to conformational activation of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. J Biol Chem 210, 16683-16688.
64. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G & Valencia A (1997) Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 271, 511-523.
65. Vriend G (1990) WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graph 8 (52-6), 29.
66. Olmea O & Valencia A (1997) Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des 2, S25-S32.
67. Pazos F & Valencia A (2002) In silica two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins 47, 219-227.
68. Klco JM, Lassere TB & Baranski TJ (2003) C5a receptor oligomerization. I. Disulfide trapping reveals oligomers and potential contact surfaces in a G protein-coupled receptor. J Biol Chem 278, 35345-35353.
69. del Sol Mesa A, Pazos F & Valencia A (2003) Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. J Mol Biol 326, 1289-1302.
70. Casari G, Sander C & Valencia A (1995) A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2, 171-178.
71. Dorit RL & Ayala FJ (1995) ADH evolution and the phylogenetic footprint. J Mol Evol 40, 658-662.
72. Andrade MA, Casari G, Sander C & Valencia A (1997) Classification of protein families and detection of the determinant residues with an improved self-organizing map. Biol Cybern 76, 441-450.
73. Zhang B, Rychlewski L, Pawlowski K, Fetrow JS, Skolnick J & Godzik A (1999) From fold predictions to function predictions: automation of functional site conservation analysis for functional genome predictions. Protein Sci 8, 1104-1115.
74. Goh CS, Bogan AA, Joachimiak M, Walther D & Cohen FE (2000) Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J Mol Biol 299, 283-293.
75. Landgraf R, Xenarios I & Eisenberg D (2001) Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J Mol Biol 307, 1487-1502.
76. Armon A, Graur D & Ben-Tal N (2001) ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J Mol Biol 307, 447-463.
77. Madabushi S, Yao H, Marsh M, Kristensen DM, Philippi A, Sowa ME & Lichtarge O (2002) Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins. J Mol Biol 316, 139-154.
78. Lichtarge O & Sowa ME (2002) Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12, 21-27.
79. Pupko T, Bell RE, Mayrose I, Glaser F & Ben-Tal N (2002) Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl. 1), S71-S77.
80. Shannon C & Weaver W (1963) Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois press, Champaign, IL.
81. Pazos F, Sanchez-Pulido L, Garcia-Ranea JA, Andrade MA, Atrian S & Valencia A (1997) Comparative analysis of different methods for the detection of specific regions in protein families. In Biocomputing and Emergent Computation (Lundh, D, Olsson. B & Narayanan, A, eds), pp. 132-145. World Scientific, Singapore.
82. Vakser IA & Jiang S (2002) Strategies for modeling the interactions of transmembrane helices of G protein-coupled receptors by geometric complementarity using the GRAMM computer algorithm. Methods Enzymol 343, 313-328.
83. Koshi JM & Goldstein RA (1995) Context-dependent optimal substitution matrices. Protein Eng 8, 641-645.
84. Koshi JM & Goldstein RA (1998) Models of natural mutations including site heterogeneity. Proteins 32, 289-295.
85. Koshi JM, Mindell DP & Goldstein RA (1999) Using physical-chemistry- based substitution models in phylogenetic analyses of HIV-1 subtypes. Mol Biol Evol 16, 173-179.
86. Ballesteros JA, Shi L & Javitch JA (2001) Structural mimicry in G Protein-coupled receptors. Implications of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin for structure-function analysis of rhodopsin-like receptors. Mol Pharmacol 60, 1-19.
87. Shapiro DA, Kristiansen K, Kroeze WK & Roth BL (2000) Differential modes of agonist binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine (2A) serotonin receptors revealed by mutation and molecular modeling of conserved residues in transmembrane region 5. Mol Pharmacol 58, 877-886.
88. Hebert TE, Moffett S, Morello JP, Loisel TP, Bichet DG, Barret C & Bouvier M (1996) A peptide derived from a beta2-adrenergic receptor transmembrane domain inhibits both receptor dimerization and activation. J Biol Chem 271, 16384-16392.
89. Visiers I, Ballesteros JA & Weinstein H (2002) Three-dimensional representations of G protein-coupled receptor structures and mechanisms. Methods Enzymol 343, 329-371.