Models of natural mutations including site heterogeneity

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 289-295

  Koshi, Jeffrey M ^a,b   Goldstein, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Boltzmann statistics; Metropolis kinetics; Molecular evolution; Mutation matrices; Protein evolution

Indexed keywords

ENVELOPE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VIRUS ENVELOPE;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HIV-1; HIV-2; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; VIRAL ENVELOPE PROTEINS;

EID: 0032529584     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19980815)32:3<289::AID-PROT4>3.0.CO;2-D     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Pauling, L., Zuckerkandl, E. Chemical paleogenetics: Molecular "restoration studies" of extinct forms of life. Acta Chem. Scand. 17:S9-S16, 1963.
2. Jermann, T.M., Optiz, J.G., Stackhouse, J., Benner, S.A. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the artiodactyl ribonuclease superfamily. Nature (London) 374:57-59, 1995.
3. Koshi, J.M., Goldstein, R.A. Probabilistic reconstruction of ancestral protein sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 42:413-420, 1996.
4. Koshi, J.M., Goldstein, R.A. Mutation matrices and physical-chemical properties: Correlations and implications. Proteins 27:336-344, 1997.
5. Dayhoff, M.O., Eck, R.V. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: "Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure." Vol. 3. Dayhoff, M.O., Eck, R.V. (eds.). Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation, 1968:33-41.
6. Altschul, S.F. Amino acid substitution matrices from an information theoretic perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 219:555-565, 1991.
7. Henikoff, S., Henikoff, J.G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89:10915-10919, 1992.
8. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., Thornton, J.M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. CABIOS 8:275-282, 1992.
9. Luthy, R., McLachlan, A.D., Eisenberg, D. Secondary structure-based profiles: Use of structure conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins 10:229-239, 1991.
10. McLachlan, A.D. Tests for comparing related amino-acid sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 61:409-424, 1971.
11. Overington, J., Donnelly, D., Johnson, M.S. Šali, A., Blundell, T.L. Environment-specific amino-acid substitution tables: Tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci. 1:216-226, 1992.
12. Risler, J.L., Delorme, M.O., Delacroix, H., Henaut, A. Amino acid substitutions in structurally related proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 204:1019-1029, 1988.
13. Feng, D.F., Johnson, M.S., Doolittle, R.F. Aligning amino-acid sequences: A comparison of commonly used methods. J. Mol. Evol. 21:112-125, 1985.
14. Fitch, W.M. An improved method of testing for evolutionary homology. J. Mol. Biol. 16:9-16, 1966.
15. Grantham, R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185:862-864, 1974.
16. Miyata, T., Miyazawa, S., Yasunaga, T. Two types of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 12:219-236, 1979.
17. Miyazawa, S., Jernigan, R.L. A new substitution matrix for protein sequence searches based on contact frequencies in protein structures. Protein Eng. 6:267-278, 1993.
18. Rao, J.K.M. New scoring matrix for amino acid residue exchange based on residue characteristic physical parameters. Int. J. Pep. Prot. Res. 29:276-281, 1987.
19. Koshi, J.M., Goldstein, R.A. Context-dependent optimal substitution matrices derived using Bayesian statistics and phylogenetic trees. Protein Eng. 8:641-645, 1995.
20. Nakai, K., Kidera, A., Kanehisa, M. Cluster analysis of amino acid indices for prediction of protein structure and function. Protein Eng. 2:93-100, 1988.
21. Tomii, K., Kanehisa, M. Analysis of amino acid indices and mutation matrices for sequence comparison and structure prediction of proteins. Protein Eng. 9:27-36, 1996.
22. Ladunga, I., Smith, R.F. Amino acid substitutions preserve protein folding by conserving steric and hydrophobicity properties. Protein Eng. 10:187-196, 1997.
23. Kidera, A., Konishi, Y., Oka, M., Ooi, T., Scheraga, H.A. Statistical analysis of the physical properties of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids. J. Protein Chem. 4:23-55, 1985.
24. Pohl, F.M. Empirical protein energy maps. Nat. New Biol. 234:227-279, 1971.
25. Miller, S., Janin, J., Lesk, A.M., Chothia, C. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 196:641-656, 1987.
26. Finkelstein, A.V., Ptitsyn, O.B., Kozitsyn, S.A. Theory of protein molecule self-organization. II. A comparison of calculated thermodynamic parameters of local secondary structures with experiment. Biopolymers 16:497-524, 1977.
27. Serrano, L., Sancho, J., Hirshberg, M., Fersht, A.R. Alpha-helix stability in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 227:544-559, 1992.
28. MacArthur, M.W., Thornton, J.M. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 218:397-412, 1991.
29. Bryant, S.H., Lawrence, C.E. The frequence of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitatively related to electrostatic potential: A statistical model for nonbonded interactions. Proteins 9:108-119, 1991.
30. Rashin, A.A., Iofin, M., Honig, B. Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins. Biochem. 25:3619-3625, 1986.
31. Finkelstein, A.V., Gutin, A.M., Badretdinov, A.Y. Boltzmann-like statistics of protein architectures. Subcell Biochem. 24:1-26, 1995.
32. Gill, P.E., Hammarling, S.J., Murray, W., Saunders, M.A., Wright, M.H. User's guide for MPSOL (version 4.0). Stanford, CA: Department of Operations Research, Stanford University Report SOL 86-2, 1986.
33. Dayhoff, M.O., Schwartz, K.M., Orcutt, B.C. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: "Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure." Vol. 5, suppl. 3. Dayhoff, M.O. (ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Biomedical Research Foundation, 1978:345.
34. Taylor, W. The classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theor. Bio. 119:205-218, 1986.
35. Gribskov, M., McLachlan, A.D., Eisenberg, D. Profile analysis: Detection of distantly related proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:4355-4358, 1987.
36. Krogh, A., Brown, M., Mian, I.S., Sjölander, K., Haussler, D. Hidden markov models in computational biology. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1501-1531, 1994.
37. Tatusov, R.L., Altschul, S.F., Koonin, E.V. Detection of conserved segments in proteins: Iterative scanning of sequence databases with alignment blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91:12091-12095, 1994.
38. Yi, T.M., Lander, E.S. Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinement. Protein Sci. 3:1315-1328, 1994.