Affixal Homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language

Cognition

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2000, Pages

  Bertram, Raymond ^a   Laine, Matti ^a   Harald Baayen, R ^b   Schreuder, Robert ^b   Hyönä, Jukka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b Interfaculty Res U Lang Speech   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Affixal Homonymy; Full form storage; Morphologically rich languages

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FINLAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MORPHOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; VERBAL MEMORY;

COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; FINLAND; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 0033987056     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00068-2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bertram R., Laine M., Karvinen K. The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 28:1999;213-226.
2. Bertram R., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. in press.
3. Caramazza A., Laudanna A., Romani C. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition. 28:1988;297-332.
4. Clahsen H., Eisenbeiss S., Sonnenstuhl-Henning I. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics. 23:1997;201-249.
5. Frauenfelder U., Schreuder R. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Booij G., van Merle J. Yearbook of Morphology. 1992;165-183 Kluwer, Dordrecht.
6. Gottlob L.R., Goldinger S.D., Stone G.O., Van Orden G.C. Reading homographs: orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;561-574.
7. Hyönä J., Laine M., Niemi J. Effects of a word's morphological complexity on readers' eye fixation patterns. Findlay J.M., Kentridge R.W., Walker R. Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications. 1995;445-452 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
8. Karlsson F., Koskenniemi K. A process model of morphology and lexicon. Folia Linguistica. 29:1985;207-231.
9. Laine, M., and Virtanen, P. (1999). WordMill Lexical Search Program. Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku, Finland.
10. Laine M., Niemi J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen P., Hyönä J. Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 12:1995;457-502.
11. Laine M., Vainio S., Hyönä J. Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language. 40:1999;109-135.
12. Laudanna A., Badecker W., Caramazza A. Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language. 31:1992;331-348.
13. Pinker S. Rules of language. Science. 153:1991;530-535.
14. Raab D.H. Statistical facilitation of simple reaction time. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. 24:1962;574-590.
15. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Modelling morphological processing. Feldman L.B. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. 1995;131-154 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
16. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. How complex simplex words can be. Journal of memory and language. 36:1997;118-139.
17. Sereno J.A., Jongman A. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition. 25:1997;425-437.
18. Stemberger J.P., MacWhinney B. Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and cognition. 14:1986;17-26.
19. Taft M. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition. 7:1979;263-272.