From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited

Language

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 527-555

  Hay, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039435068     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2002.0159     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. ARONOFF, MARK. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. ARONOFF, MARK, and S. N. SRIDHAR. 1983. Morphological levels in English and Kannada, or atarizing Reagan. Papers from the parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology, and syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society 19.3-16.
3. BAAYEN, R. HARALD. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991.181-208.
4. BAAYEN, R. HARALD. 1994. Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3).447-69.
5. BAAYEN, R. HARALD, and ROCHELLE LIEBER. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus based study. Linguistics 29.801-53.
6. BAAYEN, R. HARALD; ROCHELLE LIEBER; and ROBERT SCHREUDER. 1997. The morphological complexity of simplex nouns. Linguistics 35.861-77.
7. BAAYEN, R. HARALD; RICHARD PIEPENBROCK; and LEON GULIKERS. 1995. The CELEX lexical database (release 2) CD-ROM. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
8. BALOTA, DAVID, and JAMES CHUMBLEY. 1984. Are lexical decisions good measures of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10.340-57.
9. BRENT, MICHAEL R., and TIMOTHY A. CARTWRIGHT. 1996. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition 61.93-125.
10. BURZIO, LUIGI. 1994. Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. BYBEE, JOAN. 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, ed. by Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan, 119-42. San Diego: Academic Press.
12. BYBEE, JOAN. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5).452-55.
13. CAIRNS, PAUL; RICHARD SHILLCOCK; NICK CHATER; and JOE LEVY. 1997. Bootstrapping word boundaries: A bottom-up corpus-based approach to speech segmentation. Cognitive Psychology 33.111-53.
14. CARAMAZZA, ALFONSO; ALESSANDRO LAUDANNA; and CRISTINA ROMANI. 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 28.297-332.
15. CHRISTIANSEN, MORTEN H.; JOSEPH ALLEN; and MARK S. SEIDENBERG. 1998. Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes 13.221-68.
16. COLE, P.; C. BEAUVILLAIN; C. SEGUI; and J. SEGUI. 1989. On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language 28.1-13.
17. CONNINE, CYNTHIA M.; DEBRA TITONE; and JIAN WANG. 1993. Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19(1).81-94.
18. DELL, GARY. 1990. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5(4).313-49.
19. FABB, NIGEL. 1988. English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6.527-39.
20. FRAUENFELDER, ULI H., and ROBERT SCHREUDER. 1992. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991.165-85.
21. GIEGERICH, HEINZ J. 1999. Lexical strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. GOLDSMITH, JOHN. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
23. GROSJEAN, FRANCOIS. 1980. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics 45.189-95.
24. GROSSBERG, S. 1986. The adaptive self-organization of serial order in behaviour: Speech, language, and motor control. Pattern recognition by humans and machines, vol 1.: Speech perception, ed. by Eileen C. Schwab and Howard C. Nusbaum, 187-294. New York: Academic Press.
25. HARWOOD, F., and ALISON M. WRIGHT. 1956. Statistical study of English word formation. Language 32(2).260-73.
26. HAY, JENNIFER. 2000. Causes and consequences of word structure. Chicago: Northwestern University dissertation.
27. HAY, JENNIFER. 2001. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39(6). 1041-70.
28. HAY, JENNIFER, and R. HARALD BAAYEN. 2002a. Probabilistic phonotactics and morphological productivity. Paper presented at the Seminar on Morphological Productivity, ESSE 6, Strasbourg.
29. HAY, JENNIFER, and R. HARALD BAAYEN. 2002b. Parsing and productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 2001, to appear.
30. HAY, JENNIFER; JANE FAUST WEST; JANET PIERREHUMBERT; and MARY BECKMAN. 1999. Lexical frequency effects in speech errors. Paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, January 1999.
31. HAY, JENNIFER; JANET PIERREHUMBERT; and MARY BECKMAN. 2002. Speech perception, wellformedness, and the statistics of the lexicon. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6, ed. by John Local, Richard Ogden, and Rosalind Temple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, to appear.
32. KIPARSKY, PAUL. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the morning calm, ed. by I. S. Yang, 1-91. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
33. KIPARSKY, PAUL. 1983. Word formation and the lexicon. Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistic Conference, ed. by Frances Ingemann, 3-22. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
34. LEVELT, WILLEM. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14.41-104.
35. LUCE, PAUL A., and DAVID PISONI. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19.1-36.
36. MARSLEN-WILSON, WILLIAM; LORRAINE KOMISARJEVSKY TYLER; RACHELLE WAKSLER; and LIANNE OLDER. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101.3-33.
37. MATTYS, SVEN L.; PETER W. JUSCZYK; PAUL A. LUCE; and JAMES L. MORGAN. 1999. Word segmentation in infants: How phonotactics and prosody combine. Cognitive Psychology 38.465-94.
38. MCCLELLAND, JAMES, and JEFFREY ELMAN. 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18.1-86.
39. MCQUEEN, JAMES M. 1998. Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language 39.21-46.
40. MCQUEEN, JAMES M.; DENNIS NORRIS; and ANNE CUTLER. 1994. Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20.621-38.
41. MODOR, CAROL. 1992. Productivity and categorization in morphological classes. Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo dissertation.
42. MOHANAN, KARUVANNUR P. 1986. The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
43. NORRIS, DENNIS. 1994. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52.189-234.
44. NORRIS, DENNIS; JAMES M. MCQUEEN; and ANNE CUTLER. 1995. Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21.1209-28.
45. NORRIS, DENNIS; JAMES M. MCQUEEN; and ANNE CUTLER. 2000. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(3).299-325.
46. PESETSKY, DAVID. 1985. Morphology and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 16.193-246.
47. PITT, MARK A., and JAMES M. MCQUEEN. 1998. Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory and Language 39.347-70.
48. PLAG, INGO. 1996. Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisted: A reply to Fabb (1988). Linguistics 34(4).769-98.
49. FLAG, INGO. 1999. Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
50. PLAG, INGO. 2002. The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. Yearbook of Morphology 2001, to appear.
51. RAFFELSIEFEN, RENATE. 1999. Phonological constraints on English word formation. Yearbook of Morphology 1998.225-87.
52. SAFFRAN, JENNY R.; RICHARD N. ASLIN; and ELISSA L. NEWPORT. 1996a. Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science 274.1926-28.
53. SAFFRAN, JENNY R.; ELISSA L. NEWPORT; and RICHARD N. ASLIN. 1996b. Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language 35.606-21.
54. SELKIRK, ELISABETH O. 1982. The syntax of words. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Series, 7) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. SIEGEL, DOROTHY. 1979. Topics in English morphology. New York: Garland.
56. SPENCER, ANDREW. 1991. Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
57. SPROAT, RICHARD. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
58. STRAUSS, S. 1982. On 'relatedness paradoxes' and related paradoxes. Linguistic Inquiry 13.695-700.
59. SZPYRA, JOLANTA. 1989. The phonology-morphology interface: Cycles, levels and words. London: Routledge.
60. VAN DER LUGT, ARIE. 1999. From speech to words. Nijmegen: Catholic University dissertation.
61. VITEVITCH, MICHAEL, and PAUL LUCE. 1998. When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science 9(4).325-29.
62. WHALEN, DOUG. 1991. Infrequent words are longer in duration than frequent words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90.2311 (abstract).
63. WILLIAMS, EDWIN. 1981. On the notions 'lexically related' and 'head of a word'. Linguistic Inquiry 12.245-74.
64. WRIGHT, RICHARD. 1997. Lexical competition and reduction in speech: A preliminary report. Research on Spoken Language Processing. Progress Report 21.471-483. Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
65. WURM, LEE. 1997. Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory and Language 37.438-61.