Five hierarchical levels of sequence-structure correlation in proteins

Applied Bioinformatics

Volumn 3, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 97-104

  Bystroff, Christopher ^a   Shao, Yu ^a   Yuan, Xin ^a  

^a Research Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY HOMOLOGY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; POLYMERIZATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 20444505351     PISSN: 11755636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00822942-200403020-00004     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Riddle DS, Grantcharova VP, Santiago JV, et al. Experiment and theory highlight role of native state topology in SH3 folding. Nat Struct Biol 1999; 6 (11): 1016-24
2. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Ruczinski I, et al. Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. Biochemistry 2000; 39 (37): 11177-83
3. Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Birney E, et al. Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26 (1): 320-2
4. Gough J, Chothia C. SUPERFAMILY: HMMs representing all proteins of known structure: SCOP sequence searches, alignments and genome assignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30 (1): 268-72
5. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998; 14 (10): 846-56
6. Bystroff C, Baker D. Blind predictions of local protein structure in CASP2 targets using the I-sites library. Proteins 1997; Suppl. 1: 167-71
7. Bystroff C, Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 1998; 281 (3): 565-77
8. Bystroff C, Thorsson V, Baker D. HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. J Mol Biol 2000; 301 (1): 173-90
9. Bystroff C, Shao Y. Fully automated ab initio protein structure prediction using I-SITES, HMMSTR and ROSETTA. Bioinformatics 2002; 18 Suppl. 1: S54-61
10. Shao Y, Bystroff C. Predicting interresidue contacts using templates and pathways. Proteins 2003; 53 Suppl. 6: 497-502
11. Levinthal C. How to fold graciously. In: DeBrunner P, Tsibris J, Munck E, editors. Mossbauer spectroscopy in biological systems. Monticello (IL): University of Illinois Press, 1969
12. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973; 181 (96): 223-30
13. Baldwin RL. The nature of protein folding pathways: the classical versus the new view. J Biomol NMR 1995; 5: 103-9
14. Colon W, Roder H. Kinetic intermediates in the formation of the cytochrome c molten globule. Nat Struct Biol 1996; 3 (12): 1019-25
15. Oliveberg M, Tan YJ, Silow M, et al. The changing nature of the protein folding transition state: implications for the shape of the free-energy profile for folding. J Mol Biol 1998; 277 (4): 933-43
16. Pande VS, Grosberg A, Tanaka T, et al. Pathways for protein folding: is a new view needed? Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998; 8 (1): 68-79
17. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Insights into protein folding from NMR. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1996; 47: 369-95
18. Gillespie JR, Shortle D. Characterization of long-range structure in the denatured state of staphylococcal nuclease: II. Distance restraints from paramagnetic relaxation and calculation of an ensemble of structures. J Mol Biol 1997; 268 (1): 170-84
19. Mok YK, Kay CM, Kay LE, et al. NOE data demonstrating a compact unfolded state for an SH3 domain under non-denaturing conditions. J Mol Biol 1999; 289 (3): 619-38
20. Eaton WA, Thompson PA, Chan CK, et al. Fast events in protein folding. Structure 1996; 4 (10): 1133-9
21. Houry WA, Rothwarf DM, Scheraga HA. Circular dichroism evidence for the presence of burst-phase intermediates on the conformational folding pathway of ribonuclease A. Biochemistry 1996; 35 (31): 10125-33
22. Gulotta M, Gilmanshin R, Buscher TC, et al. Core formation in apomyoglobin: probing the upper reaches of the folding energy landscape. Biochemistry 2001; 40 (17): 5137-43
23. Fersht AR, Matouschek A, Serrano L. The folding of an enzyme: I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1992; 224 (3): 771-82
24. Nolting B, Golbik R, Neira JL, et al. The folding pathway of a protein at high resolution from microseconds to seconds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94 (3): 826-30
25. Mateu MG, Sanchez Del Pino MM, Fersht AR. Mechanism of folding and assembly of a small tetrameric protein domain from tumor suppressor p53. Nat Struct Biol 1999; 6 (2): 191-8
26. Grantcharova VP, Riddle DS, Baker D. Long-range order in the src SH3 folding transition state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97 (13): 7084-9
27. Gromiha MM, Selvaraj S. Important amino acid properties for determining the transition state structures of two-state protein mutants. FEBS Lett 2002; 526 (1-3): 129-34
28. Heidary DK, Jennings PA. Three topologically equivalent core residues affect the transition state ensemble in a protein folding reaction. J Mol Biol 2002; 316 (3): 789-98
29. Garbuzynskiy SO, Finkelstein AV, Galzitskaya OV. Outlining folding nuclei in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2004; 336 (2): 509-25
30. Chan HS, Bromberg S, Dill KA. Models of cooperativity in protein folding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1995; 348 (1323): 61-70
31. Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1997; 48: 545-600
32. Nolting B, Andert K. Mechanism of protein folding. Proteins 2000; 41 (3): 288-98
33. Laurents DV, Baldwin RL. Protein folding: matching theory and experiment. Biophys J 1998; 75 (1): 428-34
34. Shoemaker BA, Wolynes PG. Exploring structures in protein folding funnels with free energy functionals: the denatured ensemble. J Mol Biol 1999; 287 (3): 657-74
35. Nymeyer H, Socci ND, Onuchic JN. Landscape approaches for determining the ensemble of folding transition states: success and failure hinge on the degree of frustration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97 (2): 634-9
36. Zwanzig R. Two-state models of protein folding kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94 (1): 148-50
37. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998; 277 (4): 985-94
38. Miller EJ, Fischer KF, Margusee S. Experimental evaluation of topological param-eters determining protein-folding rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99 (16): 10359-63
39. Ivankov DN, Garbuzynskiy SO, Alm E, et al. Contact order revisited: influence of protein size on the folding rate. Protein Sci 2003; 12 (9): 2057-62
40. Rooman MJ, Rodriguez J, Wodak SJ. Automatic definition of recurrent local structure motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol 1990; 213 (2): 327-36
41. Efimov AV. Standard structures in proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1993; 60 (3): 201-39
42. Baldwin RL, Rose GD. Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. Trends Biochem Sci 1999; 24: 26-33
43. Han KF, Baker D. Recurring local sequence motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol 1995; 251 (1): 176-87
44. Bystroff C, Simons KT, Han KF, et al. Local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1996; 7 (4): 417-21
45. Han KF, Baker D. Global properties of the mapping between local amino acid sequence and local structure in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93 (12): 5814-8
46. Han KF, Bystroff C, Baker D. Three-dimensional structures and contexts associat-ed with recurrent amino acid sequence patterns. Protein Sci 1997; 6 (7): 1587-90
47. Jacchieri SG. Mining combinatorial data in protein sequences and structures. Mol Divers 2000; 5 (3): 145-52
48. Mendes J, Guerois R, Serrano L. Energy estimation in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12 (4): 441-6
49. Northey JGB, Maxwell KL, Davidson AR. Protein folding kinetics beyond the Phi value: using multiple amino acid substitutions to investigate the structure of the SH3 domain folding transition state. J Mol Biol 2002; 320 (2): 389-402
50. Skolnick J, Kolinski A. A unified approach to the prediction of protein structure and function. Comput Methods Protein Folding 2002; 120: 131-92
51. Steward RE, Thornton JM. Prediction of strand pairing in antiparallel and parallel beta-sheets using information theory. Proteins 2002; 48 (2): 178-91
52. Blanco FJ, Rivas G, Serrano L. A short linear peptide that folds into a native stable beta-hairpin in aqueous solution. Nat Struct Biol 1994; 1: 584-90
53. Munoz V, Blanco FJ, Serrano L. The hydrophobic-staple motif and a role for loop-residues in alpha-helix stability and protein folding. Nat Struct Biol 1995; 2 (5): 380-5
54. Viguera AR, Serrano L. Experimental analysis of the Schellman motif. J Mol Biol 1995; 251 (1): 150-60
55. Yi Q, Bystroff C, Rajagopal P, et al. Prediction and structural characterization of an independently folding substructure in the src SH3 domain. J Mol Biol 1998; 283 (1): 293-300
56. Krueger BP, Kollman PA. Molecular dynamics simulations of a highly charged peptide from an SH3 domain: possible sequence-function relationship. Proteins 2001; 45 (1): 4-15
57. Gnanakaran S, Garcia AE. Folding of a highly conserved diverging turn motif from the SH3 domain. Biophys J 2003; 84 (3): 1548-62
58. Bystroff C, Garde S. Helix propensities of short peptides: molecular dynamics versus bioinformatics. Proteins 2003; 50 (4): 552-62
59. Mok YK, Elisseeva EL, Davidson AR, et al. Dramatic stabilization of an SH3 domain by a single substitution: roles of the folded and unfolded states. J Mol Biol 2001; 307 (3): 913-28
60. Rost B. Review: protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J Struct Biol 2001; 134 (2-3): 204-18
61. Zaki MJ, Shan J, Bystroff C. Mining residue contacts in proteins using local structure predictions. IEEE International Symposium on Bio-Informatics and Biomedical Engineering; 2000 Nov 8-10; Washington, DC. Arlington (VA): IEEE, 2000
62. Brunger AT, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, et al. Three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986; 83: 3801-5
63. Crippen GM, Havel TF. Distance geometry and molecular conformation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988
64. Aszodi A, Munro RE, Taylor WR. Distance geometry-based comparative modelling. Fold Des 1997; 2: S3-6
65. Vendruscolo M, Kussell E, Domany E. Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold Des 1997; 2 (5): 295-306
66. Wintjens R, Wodak SJ, Rooman M. Typical interaction patterns in alphabeta and betaalpha turn motifs. Protein Eng 1998; 11 (7): 505-22
67. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Long- and short-range interactions in native protein structures are consistent/minimally frustrated in sequence space. Proteins 2003; 50 (1): 35-43
68. Selvaraj S, Gromiha MM. Role of hydrophobic clusters and long-range contact networks in the folding of (alpha/beta)8 barrel proteins. Biophys J 2003; 84 (3): 1919-25
69. Fariselli P, Casadio R. A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng 1999; 12 (1): 15-21
70. Pollastri G, Baldi P. Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 2002; 18 Suppl. 1: S62-70
71. Olmea O, Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des 1997; 2 (3): S25-32
72. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Fold assembly of small proteins using Monte Carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence align-ments. J Mol Biol 1998; 277 (2): 419-48
73. Singer MS, Vriend G, Bywater RP. Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix. Protein Eng 2002; 15 (9): 721-5
74. Hu J, Shen X, Shao Y, et al. Mining protein contact maps. 2nd BIOKDD Workshop on Data Mining in Bioinformatics; 2002 Jul 23; Edmonton (AB). Edmonton: BIOKDD, 2002
75. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, et al. Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins 2001; 45 Suppl. 5: 157-62
76. Jones DT, McGuffin LJ, et al. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999; 287 (4): 797-815
77. Skolnick J, Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, et al. TOUCHSTONE: a unified approach to protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003; 53 Suppl. 6: 469-79
78. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, et al. CATH: a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997; 5 (8): 1093-108
79. Rabiner LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 1989; 77 (2): 257-86
80. CASP5. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques from Protein Structure Prediction. 1-5 Dec 2002, Asilamar, CA, USA. Proteins 2003; 53 Suppl. 6: 333-595
81. Murzin AG, Finkelstein AV. General architecture of the alpha-helical globule. J Mol Biol 1988; 204 (3): 749-69
82. Efimov AV. Favoured structural motifs in globular proteins. Structure 1994; 2 (11): 999-1002
83. Murzin AG, Lesk AM, Chothia C. Principles determining the structure of beta-sheet barrels in proteins: II. The observed structures. J Mol Biol 1994; 236 (5): 1382-400
84. Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Bonneau R, et al. Distributions of beta sheets in proteins with application to structure prediction. Proteins 2002; 48 (1): 85-97
85. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 1994; 372 (6507): 631-4
86. Russell RB, Sasieni PD, Sternberg MJ. Supersites within superfolds: binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J Mol Biol 1998; 282 (4): 903-18
87. Zhang C, DeLisi C. Estimating the number of protein folds. J Mol Biol 1998; 284 (5): 1301-5